For as long as I've been following baseball, these are always the managerial decisions that get the most scrutinized. I've always thought people are too critical of them too. To me, people too often take it as a straight if it works, it's a great decision, if it doesn't work, it isn't. I don't think that's fair. We all know if Schanaman gets into trouble, then people ask why we started the 9th with him when Gomes is our closer. Just because something doesn't work doesn't mean it was the wrong decision. If coming in the 9th is your closer's role, then I say do it.
And I will not acknowledge that the complete lack of offense for 5 innings is irrelevant. I'm not laying the loss on the offense, but to just brush it off as completely irrelevant I don't think is fair either. 5 runs is nice, but it's nowhere near big enough to just cruise and think your offense can just lay off the rest of the game. The offense wasn't just cold, it was completely non-existent. That can never be brushed off as OK. If you got a 10 run lead, then maybe you can just say it wasn't a big deal. But we didn't have that big of a lead.