ADVERTISEMENT

No more screens; horizontal passes

I would hope that is the lesson of the game for the offense. Obviously, a terrible INT by Raiola in crunch time. He's not ready quite yet for these moments, but 3rd & 18 is tough. Satt is putting his true frosh QB in that position. Why not more pick plays for the WR? Banks got an OPI but go back to the 1 on 1 down the field. Fidone in the middle. Anything works better than these screens and flare-outs to the RB. They can't block in space. Please Satt figure this out.

Defense came to play. Love the focus on taking away the run. Something we can hang our hat on the rest of the season. GBR

I have a theory about Coach Cignetti and his 6 other James Madison Coaches...

This guy comes off as the cockiest mothereffer in the history of coaching. Barry Switzer was cocky, but Barry Switzer was also competing for National Championships before he was 40 years-old. Cignetti wasn't even an FBS head coach until his late 50s.

I believe his current Indiana team is VERY similar in talent, depth, and experience compared to his last 3 teams at James Madison. Those teams finished 12-1, 8-3, and 11-2.

If you were take the last 3 James Madison teams and even the current James Madison team coached by his former DC, I believe all 4 of those teams would be 6-0 vs. this schedule:

FIU
Western Illinois
@ UCLA team about go 1-11
Charlotte
Maryland team replacing 15 starters
@ Northwestern

The current James Madison team is 4-1, and I believe that team would be undefeated vs. this current schedule. Hell, they beat Charlotte 35-6.

IMO, Cignetti knew that if he kicked 30 terrible Indiana players to the curb and brought in 20 James Madison players and 10 other transfers that he would absolutely have a roster good enough to beat this Sister's of the Poor schedule.

I bring this up to let you all know that this Indiana team is very good. They are well coached, skilled, and don't make mistakes. Their passing game is exceptional. The timing, spacing, and route running is indicative of a Head Coach who's been coaching WRs, QBs, and Passing games for 30 years. But they LOOK like a high flying G5 team.

Nebraska has a LOT more talent than this team.


And I believe this is the type of game where Dylan Raiola has a chance to break out. They do have gaudy numbers, and their players don't make mistakes. But talent and cream rises to the top.

Expectations

We should all agree the Univ. is paying coaches enough to set reasonable and proper expectations or goals.
The “Chasing 3” goal that Rhule set is nothing close. “We just need those 3 points to win those close games and turn this thing around. Just make one more play.”
Well what would 3 pts really look like?

2023-2024: We ranked 120th with 18 points per game.
Additional 3 pts per game = 21 which would have ranked 102nd last year.

2024-2025: We currently rank 95th in points per game with 24, exceeding Rhule/Satt’s expectation at +5 pts per game.
"Chasing 3" additional points now = 27 which would only rank us at 77th.

Sound familiar?
Satt's admission of no goal or awareness of the very basic measure yards per play left him “guessing” numbers that would rank similarly.
He and Rhule seem ok with the very low standard or expectation.

This is frankly infuriating. Having a proper goal isn't rocket science.
Why were we not “chasing 11” pts per game to get us at least into the top 50 of scoring offenses? Or just imagine “chasing 14” pts per game to get us around the top 25. But we were good with taking slow baby steps to only make one more play or “chase 3.”

I’d pair this with what we pay coaches, and how we’ve recruited athletes ranked collectively between 15th and 39th the last 5 years.
Yet our results that exceed the coach’s own goal ranks us in the 90’s.

B1G has tough defenses, I get it, but our schedule has not been a crazy guantlet so far. Top 20 type of athletes and well paid coaches should at least get us into the top 50 for results before we start making excuses.

GBR

Power rank our remaining schedule

We have: Northern Iowa, Illinois, Purdue, Rutgers, Indiana, Ohio State, UCLA, USC, Wisconsin, Iowa.

I'm thinking of it mostly from who's going to be the toughest win:

1. Ohio St
2. USC (Not sold on Moss, but they've got a ton of talent)
3. Rutgers (Schiano just is able to work magic with these guys)
4. Illinois (playing well so far)
5. Indiana (Colorado of the B1G this year)
6. Iowa (That defense)
7. Wisconsin (Just barely better than Purdue)
8. Purdue (Last three are pretty interchangeable)
9. UCLA
10. Northern Iowa

Basketball Breaking down Nebraska basketball's roster with season-opener in sight

With Nebraska's final preseason action this Sunday with an exhibition against Grand Valley State University, the season-opener against Texas Rio Grande Valley on Nov. 4 is within sight.

Here's a quick look at Fred Hoiberg's new-look roster:

Positives from today…..

In no particular order:

1. FG kicking. If I woke up tomorrow with my head sewn to the carpet, I wouldn't be more surprised than I am right now.

2. Defense, especially vs the run. The line realty did control the line of scrimmage.

3. Raiola’s legs. Definitely added an element to our offense we haven’t seen since Colorado. Hope he keeps it up (and doesn’t get hurt, of course)

All in all, much improved from last Saturday and hopefully a tone setting game for the rest of the season.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT