I'm just curious, did you also recalculate for the teams 1-38 to account for their losses as well?Nebraska's rivals ranking for the 2017 class now drops to 39th...
I did not, simply removing the point totals from those 3 recruits and subtracting it from our totalI'm just curious, did you also recalculate for the teams 1-38 to account for their losses as well?
1 to 1.5 IMO. We're above average for sure on this class already, I won't debate that. But as I looked through the top few '17 classes a few days ago, I saw at least one school that will also likely be without 3 of their signees, so we're not in a highly abnormal territory, either. Not to mention, the KJJ situation is a little different then Blades and Watts. He did technically... make it on campus.I think 3 is far above average compared to most schools. My guess for the BIG schools would be somewhere between 0.5 and 1 per year. I suspect our precamp attrition rate for this class is ~ 3x higher than the norm. When you consider that 2 of 3 lost were among our highest rated recruits my guess is that if you recalculated the ratings based on every schools attrition to this point it would be ranked well below 20.
maybe my assumptions above are wrong but losing 1 recruit every year to every other year seems about right
1 to 1.5 IMO. We're above average for sure on this class already, I won't debate that. But as I looked through the top few '17 classes a few days ago, I saw at least one school that will also likely be without 3 of their signees, so we're not in a highly abnormal territory, either. Not to mention, the KJJ situation is a little different then Blades and Watts. He did technically... make it on campus.
the thing with Wisconsin is their AD runs that program. Regardless of what coach is there, there won't be any big change in identity or formula.. this also means they have a lot of coaching turnover.I believe there's a decent chance Keyshawn Jr comes back next year IMHO. With this being Riley's 3rd year, I think he has more of the type of players fit for his system than the first 2 seasons. We're about to find out if our coaching staff can turn these recruiting classes into something. If Wisconsin can do it with 3 different head coaches and have generally below average recruiting classes, with Riley's new hires (especially on defense) I think Nebraska can do the same.
We will be lucky to get 5 wins this year without those guys.How many wins does losing these three recruits cost Nebraska in 2017?
I don't care about 2018-2021, that isn't what I asked.
I'm just curious, did you also recalculate for the teams 1-38 to account for their losses as well?
Yeah? How did you figure that one out, when not all the schools have reported enrollee numbers?We would have been 42nd. I think 38th figuring in your question. Top 40 class.
So...Nebraska's rivals ranking for the 2017 class now drops to 39th...
I'm just curious, did you also recalculate for the teams 1-38 to account for their losses as well?
anyone know the last time Nebraska lost 3 recruits before camp?
I believe everyone made it to fall camp last year
Did you recalculate Bo's stellar 2013 class after Ernest Suttles, Drake Martinez, Trevell Dixon, Dimara Mixon, Dwayne Johnson, Johnny Stanton, Kevin Gladney,Greg Hart, Courtney Love all didn't make it or transferred??We would have been 42nd. I think 38th figuring in your question. Top 40 class.
2011 ..Peat, Pirman, Aaron Green, Sterup, Starling, Harrison, Klachko and Tyler Moore bailed?? This is a fun game..go to work finatic and Roberson...crunch those Bo numbers boys, let me know where those classes come out.
Sad..really, they both circle jerk around their Bo poster nightly. All that's missing is a pivot man. Keep looking boys, there is a few idiots still around.Let these boys have some slack. They've been waiting for some bad news on Riley. Now, that they've got it they have to wave it in somebody's face. Won't you please think of Bo!
So in other words, your recalculation is completely worthless and meaningless and was done solely to make Riley look bad. Where is your recalculation for all of Bo's classes? Oh-but you won't do that because it doesn't fit your agenda. Your "recalculation" is nothing but a worthless piece of agenda crap. Fake news extraordinaire.I did not, simply removing the point totals from those 3 recruits and subtracting it from our total
Isn't that the truth!Keep looking boys, there is a few idiots still around.
Callahans recruits. Get back to your pivotal role as pivot man.How was bo able to pump 9 wins yearly with such bad recruiting? Mike will have had one in four years when he "retires"
Bo Pelini sucked. He was a bastard. If people want to continue to get on their knees for him, then that shows me what type of people they are.
I hate that I'm going back to the Bo argument circle jerk but I'm just gonna say that it's not like those were solid 9 wins. Several times it was barely. Remember when Ameer and to save us from McNeese freaking state? If he doesnt have that Heisman esque run after the catch we become the biggest upset since App Stare depantsed Michigan on opening weekend.How was bo able to pump 9 wins yearly with such bad recruiting? Mike will have had one in four years when he "retires"
How was bo able to pump 9 wins yearly with such bad recruiting? Mike will have had one in four years when he "retires"
Here we go again. You can't criticize anything regarding the current staff and still be supportive overall. Any criticism means you are a fan of Bo. Just like in the initial years any criticism of Bo meant you wanted Callahan back.
It doesn't have to be all or none. For instance on whole I really disliked Bo, however what he did or partnered with the university to do for the Hoffman family was amazing.
I think it is fair to have some questions about how the 2017 class has trended since signing day. Doesn't mean it was horrible and doesn't mean you automatically think Bo did a better job
Ultimately Coach Riley will be judged on his wins and losses. Almost all would agree that regardless of how things turn out he is a better representative of the program.
GBR
Where in the hell did this "trending from signing day" metric come from? As far as I know, it has not been applied to no other coach in the moment, except now when people want to point out how fairly normal this is.
The general talking point around recruiting classes is you are going to lose half your class to some reason or another, legal, medical, dud on the field, whatever. There's literally zero reason to judge now "how the class is trending" other than to find nits to pick in a coach who is otherwise doing a good job. There's no magic toothfairy that promises all Husker fans it'll only take the 3* at positions that are well stocked will be the ones who drop.
Hell we hated Bill Callahan, and we at least did him the service of evaluating his recruiting like every other coach in the business, a bunch of folks sat around in 2010 and wrote an article on how his 2005 class ended up.
We aren't even in fall camp folks, and people want to track how the 2017 class recruiting ranking should be revised. Wake up folks, the recruits, the staff, they know that BS doesn't mean anything for 2017 now, its all about what happens the next few years.
If one wants to fight about recruiting ranking....its 2018 now guys.
Where in the hell did this "trending from signing day" metric come from?
Likely that KJJ would have muddled along for a year or so and then got his act together after a RS. His dad wants more than that.I agree. This is not something to fault Riley for. He took chances on a few this class. I would not consider KJJ on Riley at all. Just a young man who wasn't keeping focused on his reason for being here. All this means is that adjustments have to be made and others have to step up. In fact, we can take a few more in the upcoming class that was supposed to be so small. Like I said earlier in the week, Riley is laying a great foundation. Piling on Riley this early in the game is whimsical. Shows your agenda.