Don't forget Greg Sunburned.
I had high praise for TA before the start of last season. He is fiercely competitive and has a cannon for an arm. I thought in year two under Langs he would finally show his true potential. I was wrong. He just lacked accuracy as a passer, lacked touch on the short throws, and locked in on his primary receiver all the time. He would not be in my top ten.
The question is kind of pointless but I was just debating with my dad who the better QB was, Armstrong or TMart? My dad says Armstrong. I say TMart. My sister chimed in and said they were equally frustrating in their hot/cold inconsistency.
Thoughts?
Here are mine:From what I've seen in my lifetime I go...
1. Turner Gill
2. Tommie Frazier
3. Eric Crouch
4. Steve Taylor
5. Jerry Tagge
6. Scott Frost
7. Zac Taylor
8. David Humm
9. Gerry Gdowski
10. Vince Ferragamo
I watched Steve Taylor get happy feet in pretty much every big game, and remember reading stories about OL having to tell him to calm down in the huddle. Nebraska has three qbs primarily responsible for NCs, a Heisman qb beyond that, and Turner Gill, just for starters. Taylor in a top 5 is, in my opinion, ridiculous.Here are mine:
Eric crouch
Tommie Frazier
Turner Gill
Scott Frost
Steve Taylor
Jerry Tagge
Dennis Claridge
Gerry Gdowski
David Humm
Vince Ferragamo
Zac Taylor
Joe Ganz
I stand by my assessment. I think he was a great QBI watched Steve Taylor get happy feet in pretty much every big game, and remember reading stories about OL having to tell him to calm down in the huddle. Nebraska has three qbs primarily responsible for NCs, a Heisman qb beyond that, and Turner Gill, just for starters. Taylor in a top 5 is, in my opinion, ridiculous.
While I know he was blessed with tremendous talent, in more ways than one (I remember the white Honda he drove with its dark windows and gold plating, ahem), and I respect your opinions here, winning big games is a big deal; not his forte, it just didn't often happen.I stand by my assessment. I think he was a great QB
I agree but not to the degree you say. Berlinger could have plausibly been a two-time NC winner.Tommie Frazier is number one period. The rest of the list can be debated but Nebraska does not get to the championship in 93 and win it in 94/95 without him. Yes he played along with some great talent but he was a difference maker.
Tommie Frazier was our Michael Jordan. He was a cold hearted assassin on the football field. He demanded respect from every single player on the field. He didn't have problems getting in the faces of the upperclassmen when he was a freshman and telling them to get in line because it was now his team. How soon we forget that many experts believed he should have won the Heisman Trophy after his performance in the Fiesta Bowl against Florida.
Many experts believe he was one of the best if not the best quarterback in the history of college football.
With all due respect to some posters in this thread...to have Tommie Frazier ranked lower than the #1 quarterback at the University of Nebraska is simply ludicrous.
Bleacher Report... #2 Quarterback of All Time
Bleacher Report...#20 College Football Player of All Time
NBC Sports Top Five... #1 Quarterback All Time
Fansided Top 10 Option Quarterbacks #2 All Time
I agree but not to the degree you say. Berlinger could have plausibly been a two-time NC winner.
But Tommie changed the culture. Nobody else is close. It is not a reasonable argument to say anyone else is the"best qb" in Nebraska history. A pure "best-talent" argument could be made - but winning games has to be part of even that - but Tommie is the best qb in Nebraska history. Might be, ever.
I thought the question was Martinez or Armstrong.
In terms of raw talent and suitability for the offense he ran, I would rate Crouch as the most talented QB in Husker history. You put him on those 94-95 teams and I would wager he would have put up truly huge numbers in the option game. His throwing was as accurate as Frazier's, he was faster than Frazier, he had more shake and bake than Frazier in the open field, he was just as good as Frazier in running the option, he held onto the ball as well as Frazier, he was more durable (perhaps) than Frazier, and he had just as high a football IQ as Frazier.
Good points. And don't get me wrong ... I loved Frazier. It is also hard for me to ignore Gill. Put Gill on that 95 team and see what he could do. And that is what is so hard about assessing Frazier. He was obviously a truly great talent. But he was surrounded by the greatest collection of talent in Husker history. What would Gill or Crouch have done in 95? Or even McCant? Conversely, how would Frazier have done surrounded by the talent Crouch had in 1999-2001?
I think it is best just to say that players like Frazier, Frost, Gill and Crouch were all great and comparing them is almost impossible.
Crouch wouldn't have had as many carries for that 95 team as he did when he played. If he did he would be in the slot quickly.
Frazier would have pitched the ball in 99-01
Gerry good too.Mark doesn't hold a candle to Jimmy Godowski.
Turner Gill not top 10?In my years..
1. Tommy Frazier
2. Jerry Tagge
3. Eric Crouch
4. Bob Churchich
5. Vince Ferragamo
6. David Humm
7. Dennis Claridge
8. Zack Taylor
9.Brook Berringer
10. Van Brownson
Too late to count but I forgot Steve Taylor who would belong in middle of this pack. Most forget Churchich but he was one of the biggest leaders ever for NU. Had them positioned twice for title. Held Sugar Bowl passing record for many years. ( Big 8 Batting Champ too )
Couldn't agree more. Crouch was a lone man standing against Miami in the championship game. He was a stud!In terms of raw talent and suitability for the offense he ran, I would rate Crouch as the most talented QB in Husker history. You put him on those 94-95 teams and I would wager he would have put up truly huge numbers in the option game. His throwing was as accurate as Frazier's, he was faster than Frazier, he had more shake and bake than Frazier in the open field, he was just as good as Frazier in running the option, he held onto the ball as well as Frazier, he was more durable (perhaps) than Frazier, and he had just as high a football IQ as Frazier.
Couldn't agree more. Crouch was a lone man standing against Miami in the championship game. He was a stud!
I watched Steve Taylor get happy feet in pretty much every big game, and remember reading stories about OL having to tell him to calm down in the huddle. Nebraska has three qbs primarily responsible for NCs, a Heisman qb beyond that, and Turner Gill, just for starters. Taylor in a top 5 is, in my opinion, ridiculous.
I stand by my assessment. I think he was a great QB
Penny, I don't normally disagree with you that much, but I agree with mel mains Steve Taylor was over rated and if Gerry Godwski had a chance to play more than one year he would easily been one of the top 5 Husker QB's.
Frazier and Gill top 2,Eric Crouch, Jerry Tagge, Scott Frost and Vince Ferragamo round out my best.
I think you pointed out TF's greatest asset, LEADERSHIP. I do believe Nebraska has had better QB by definition, but not a better leader.Tommie Frazier is number one period. The rest of the list can be debated but Nebraska does not get to the championship in 93 and win it in 94/95 without him. Yes he played along with some great talent but he was the difference maker. The fortunes of the Nebraska Football Program changed when he signed with the Huskers and the change to the 4-3 in 1993.
Tommie Frazier was our Michael Jordan. He was a cold hearted assassin on the football field. He demanded respect from every single player on the field. He didn't have problems getting in the faces of the upperclassmen when he was a freshman and telling them to get in line because it was now his team. How soon we forget that many experts believed he should have won the Heisman Trophy after his performance in the Fiesta Bowl against Florida.
Many experts believe he was one of the best if not the best quarterback in the history of college football but some debate his status at Nebraska?
With all due respect to some posters in this thread...to have Tommie Frazier ranked lower than the #1 quarterback at the University of Nebraska is simply ludicrous.
Bleacher Report... #2 Quarterback of All Time
Bleacher Report...#20 College Football Player of All Time
NBC Sports Top Five... #1 Quarterback All Time
Fansided Top 10 Option Quarterbacks #2 All Time
Top College Football Players in the 1990's...#1 in the 1990's
12 Best Players in College Football History to not win the Heisman...Frazier #5
College Football Hall of Fame...Frazier Inducted in 2013
Taylor had 8 wins over AP top 12 teams in his career. So he won plenty of big games just maybe not the big OU games (though you can't really the '86 game on him).I watched Steve Taylor get happy feet in pretty much every big game, and remember reading stories about OL having to tell him to calm down in the huddle. Nebraska has three qbs primarily responsible for NCs, a Heisman qb beyond that, and Turner Gill, just for starters. Taylor in a top 5 is, in my opinion, ridiculous.
I agree 100%. I put Gill at number 1 because of overall skill set. Much better passer than Tommie or Crouch. But the intagables and leadership is what made Tommie special. Let's not forget Crouch led a totally average team in 2001 to the National Championship game (whether deserved of not). That team had no business going 11-2 and probably wouldn't have won 8 or 9 without Crouch. Whether not he was a great option QB is debatable, but he certainly was one of the most explosive playmakers we've ever seen at Nebraska.I think you pointed out TF's greatest asset, LEADERSHIP. I do believe Nebraska has had better QB by definition, but not a better leader.
Wow.I stand by my assessment. I think he was a great QB
Wow. You surmised all that because I rate Taylor 5th?Wow.
Either you dont know qbs or you dont respect Nebraskas history.
wait wait wait....Wow. You surmised all that because I rate Taylor 5th?
Step back from the cliff... lol
Asking who's better between TMart and Tommy Armstrong is like asking which turd smells better
That's like comparing gonorrhea and syphilis. I wouldn't care for either of them.