Goodness, gracious. Do you think anyone outside of Nebraska is saying, "Yep, Nebraska might not win because they have a couple new coaches" while Oregon has a whole new staff? Seriously?Took your advice and checked the ratings. Guess what? Oregon's average of 22 over 5 years is better than Nebraska's average of 25 over 5 years. How many points is home field advantage good for?
Now I definitely see why we should have no trouble with Oregon next year in their back yard. Never mind the fact that we went from 6-7 to 9-4 in one year... no way Oregon could go from 4-8 to a respectable season with a win over Nebraska.
Tom, you really ought to quit... you're gonna lose this one because you're argument has too many holes. The argument is that a win at Oregon isn't a given. But you are saying it absolutely should be. Based on the talent and home field advantage argument, and assuming the coaches can come in and capture the team buy-in from the start, Oregon could easily emerge from that game with a victory. Not to mention Nebraska is breaking in a new QB and a new defensive system with 3 new coaches on defense as well... Why is it so hard to admit that this is a possibility, and maybe a strong one at that?
I guess we're moving goal posts, huh tom? It must be hard not to be able to use the same idioms when you were tom, now that you're masquerading as Tom's wife...
Do you think anyone outside of Nebraska who looks at the recruiting rankings thinks, "Oregon is a way more talented team than the Huskers"?
Do you think anyone outside of Nebraska who looks at Oregon thinks, "A freshman qb at Oregon who started a handful of games last year and went 2-5 ought to be way better than a highly rated qb starting at Nebraska"?
Have you been spending a lot of time "enjoying" Colorado recently?