ADVERTISEMENT

Under the 4 team format, Ohio State wouldn't have qualified


Don’t need 16 teams with 3 losses teams getting in not winning their CCG.
12 is perfect just need the 4 top rated teams get byes.
I would rather see 8 no byes. But if 12 is it . I like the CC getting the byes because ND cannot be rewarded for not playing in a conference and no risk of an 13th game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigboxes
OK if it is no matter what, so then which conferences "count" for the automatic bids? Again the team that won the 12 team tournament didn't even qualify for their conference title game. So with OSU getting a berth, does that really eliminate the b-b-bbut a 2 loss Big Ten/SEC etc team is probably better on paper argument? There is already a bias for those power league teams should there be a limit on the number of teams per league that can qualify for the CFP?
each conference, just like this year. then the remaining teams should be subject to judgment based on their body of work.

the heart of your issue is that you're specifically upset Ohio State won it all without winning their conference.

you don't seem mad that Texas, Indiana, Penn St, and Tennessee (all teams that Ohio State beat) had that same opportunity.
 
Can we all at least agree that there is zero chance of the field being made smaller at this point? Ain't happening. I'm hoping for some changes to how the field is seeded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jteten and c3o
Ohio State winning the championship was the best example of why a 12 team playoff needed to happen years ago.
Agreed. And going back further, the NC game matchup would have been Oregon vs Georgia. Neither team survived their first playoff game. Both were beaten badly too.
A playoff has been needed for a long time. We just need to get rid of the conf championship games and fix the seedings.
 
Agreed. And going back further, the NC game matchup would have been Oregon vs Georgia. Neither team survived their first playoff game. Both were beaten badly too.
A playoff has been needed for a long time. We just need to get rid of the conf championship games and fix the seedings.
Conference championship games aren't going away. Too much money is made off them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mgbreis
It mattered everything. That team responded from that loss with a no lose attitude. Went on to dominate some really good teams. The playoffs were a huge success other than some seeding errors. Looking forward to Nebraska being relevant enough to put their name in the hat
OSU had the hardest path to a championship and won it in a dominant manner. Most people considered Tenn, Oregon, Texas, and ND all teams that stood a chance to win the playoff. Most people recognized Boise St, SMU, Clemson, and ASU had little chance and were likely to lose in the opening round. Props to OSU for leaving no doubt on the field.
 
Conference championship games aren't going away. Too much money is made off them.
Exactly. Like these conferences really care if the "best" team wins. They want to A) get more of their teams in, and B) make a shitload of money.
 
Conference championship games aren't going away. Too much money is made off them.
More money to be made by having more playoff teams and keeping teams fresher for the playoff. Georgia's QB was injured in what ended up a meaningless game. With no SEC teams in the final I guarantee that conference is thinking about ditching it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moralvictories
Can we all at least agree that there is zero chance of the field being made smaller at this point? Ain't happening. I'm hoping for some changes to how the field is seeded.
They need to seed the teams according to final ranking, not giving byes or 3/4 seed to the top team in the shitty conferences. Why should Boise get a 4 seed and bye.. their conference fvcking sucks.
They should change that and we will be fine.
Also, one small change would be to give rostered playoff players a share.. like baseball playoffs. So the ND and OSU players might get a $20k Bonus each player for making it to the final game. No sharing with the rest of the conference, just a bonus for the players on the team
 
Can we all at least agree that there is zero chance of the field being made smaller at this point? Ain't happening. I'm hoping for some changes to how the field is seeded.
As long it includes ND not receiving a bye. Only chance I see is a G5 (Boise ) champion should not receive a bye .
 
  • Like
Reactions: mgbreis
More money to be made by having more playoff teams and keeping teams fresher for the playoff. Georgia's QB was injured in what ended up a meaningless game. With no SEC teams in the final I guarantee that conference is thinking about ditching it.
For the SEC it isn't as big of a deal because they will get multiple teams in most years. For the Big 12 and the ACC, their CCG game might be their only shot at getting one team in. Yeah, they could just declare the team with the best record the champion but for the Big 12 with a 4 way tie, who would that be????
 
Conf championships are pointless. Just call the team with the best record conf champion. And yes, because of variances in schedule strength a two loss team might well be the best team.
While I think you're right, the sentimental part of me loves the conference championship.

Were we to sneak into the conference championship and upset someone like Ohio State/Oregon without winning the national championship, I would consider the season a sucesss.

Perhaps I'm in the minority but the conference championship, much like NY6 bowl games, leave a team something to hang their hat on.
 
While I think you're right, the sentimental part of me loves the conference championship.

Were we to sneak into the conference championship and upset someone like Ohio State/Oregon without winning the national championship, I would consider the season a sucesss.

Perhaps I'm in the minority but the conference championship, much like NY6 bowl games, leave a team something to hang their hat on.
Without the ACC conference championship game, Clemson doesn't get in the playoffs. Having a conference championship game benefitted the ACC.
 
Without the ACC conference championship game, Clemson doesn't get in the playoffs. Having a conference championship game benefitted the ACC.
100%

but i still feel like they deserved in, based on that alone.

i want there to be cinderella matchups. ASU/Texas was maybe the most entertaining game of the playoffs because of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moralvictories
each conference, just like this year. then the remaining teams should be subject to judgment based on their body of work.

the heart of your issue is that you're specifically upset Ohio State won it all without winning their conference.

you don't seem mad that Texas, Indiana, Penn St, and Tennessee (all teams that Ohio State beat) had that same opportunity.
Not at all, it has to do with the byes, who gets them, and how that affects the pairing in the first and second rounds.
 
100%

but i still feel like they deserved in, based on that alone.

i want there to be cinderella matchups. ASU/Texas was maybe the most entertaining game of the playoffs because of that.
So you don't really care about determining the best team then. That I guess is the basis for my argument. It appears you are fine with a 3 loss Clemson getting a berth over a 3 loss Alabama team, simply because their league was weak. The results of the CFP validated this Clemson 14 point losers to SEC runner up Texas, and it probably wasn't that close and SMU 28 point losers to Penn St arguably the 3rd best team in the Big Ten.

This is also my rationale for not needing more than 8 teams in the CFP. IF your last 4 to get in are losing an average of 17 points in the CFP, why is this even a discussion?
 
So you don't really care about determining the best team then. That I guess is the basis for my argument. It appears you are fine with a 3 loss Clemson getting a berth over a 3 loss Alabama team, simply because their league was weak. The results of the CFP validated this Clemson 14 point losers to SEC runner up Texas, and it probably wasn't that close and SMU 28 point losers to Penn St arguably the 3rd best team in the Big Ten.

This is also my rationale for not needing more than 8 teams in the CFP. IF your last 4 to get in are losing an average of 17 points in the CFP, why is this even a discussion?
It's better to be arguing over two and three loss teams getting left out rather than an undefeated team getting left out.
 
Not a fan of the 12 team playoff but it's here and we'll have to live with it for now.

That being said, the 12 "perceived" best teams should be in. No automatic bids, four top ranked teams get the byes. Reseed after each round so the highest remaining seed always plays the lowest remaining seed. No set bracket BS.

It's not rocket science but the powers that be make it harder than it has to be.
 
Not a fan of the 12 team playoff but it's here and we'll have to live with it for now.

That being said, the 12 "perceived" best teams should be in. No automatic bids, four top ranked teams get the byes. Reseed after each round so the highest remaining seed always plays the lowest remaining seed. No set bracket BS.

It's not rocket science but the powers that be make it harder than it has to be.
Agree with everything but the reseed. If you are the 12 seed and beat the 5 especially on their home field, you should play the 4 in then next round. That is a reward for winning that game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeliniTheCrutch
except the team who won it all. Losing to Michigan didn't matter at all let alone immensely.

They weren't better than Michigan on the day they played, they needed a redo against Oregon.
OSU takes games off and it has cost them in the past. It almost cost them this year.
 
My take is the number of teams was so that the conference winners of the Big 12 and ACC would at least be included, plus the more minor conferences winners might be included as well. An 8 team playoff with no inclusion for conference winners would have been a B1G, SEC and ND affair.
 
You would actually have to try to not like the new playoffs and it will only be better with 16 teams.

Right now if you don't "like it" it is only because you have been conditioned to like a 4 team format, which was stupid. It is like people that still with there was the old BCS system, it is just what you were used to liking.

The only real changes now

1. 16 teams with either two 8 team brackets or 4 four team brackets.
2. First and second round games held on campuses
3. Championship game played on a Saturday evening.
 
You would actually have to try to not like the new playoffs and it will only be better with 16 teams.

Right now if you don't "like it" it is only because you have been conditioned to like a 4 team format, which was stupid. It is like people that still with there was the old BCS system, it is just what you were used to liking.

The only real changes now

1. 16 teams with either two 8 team brackets or 4 four team brackets.
2. First and second round games held on campuses
3. Championship game played on a Saturday evening.
Bull Shit the New years6 isn’t going away, take that motion out of your head.
Kids also love playing in these major bowls and it’s a reward.
Who gives a flying Fvck when the championship game is played.

#1 blows chow.
 
You would actually have to try to not like the new playoffs and it will only be better with 16 teams.

Right now if you don't "like it" it is only because you have been conditioned to like a 4 team format, which was stupid. It is like people that still with there was the old BCS system, it is just what you were used to liking.

The only real changes now

1. 16 teams with either two 8 team brackets or 4 four team brackets.
2. First and second round games held on campuses
3. Championship game played on a Saturday evening.
I agree with 2-3 , play it in a Saturday a normal CFB day . But then again I think the final 4 BB should be a Thursday-Saturday.
 
Bull Shit the New years6 isn’t going away, take that motion out of your head.
Kids also love playing in these major bowls and it’s a reward.
Who gives a flying Fvck when the championship game is played.

#1 blows chow.
I don't even know what the "New Years 6" is...which means it is probably on the way out.

Major bowls are no longer a thing. In 10 years no player will even know what a "major" bowl is, they will just know this

1. We made the playoffs
2. We are playing in some kind of bowl game
3. We could not win 6 games.

Then again, you might be right, I am wrong A LOT.
 
I agree with 2-3 , play it in a Saturday a normal CFB day . But then again I think the final 4 BB should be a Thursday-Saturday.
That would be SICK!

There is this weird idea that Fri/Sat or not "TV nights" and I get that idea but "TV" has changed and it is no longer Murder, She Wrote and JAG.

Sporting events on a Fri/Sat evening would do just fine.
 
I don't even know what the "New Years 6" is...which means it is probably on the way out.

Major bowls are no longer a thing. In 10 years no player will even know what a "major" bowl is, they will just know this

1. We made the playoffs
2. We are playing in some kind of bowl game
3. We could not win 6 games.

Then again, you might be right, I am wrong A LOT.
Man you shouldn’t even express your opinion if you don’t know that..

Orange
Rose
Sugar
Cotton
Fiesta
Peach
These are the New Years6.
 
Man you shouldn’t even express your opinion if you don’t know that..

Orange
Rose
Sugar
Cotton
Fiesta
Peach
These are the New Years6.
Wait, are those bowl games that hosted playoff games this year?

because if that is the case, they are already gone.

And of course my opinion should not be expressed or counted! This is a post board, this is not "real life"
 
Last edited:
Wait, are those bowl games that hosted playoff games this year?

because if that is the case, they are already gone.

And of course my opinion should not be expressed or counted! This is a post board, this is not "real life"
Are you really this stupid.. You shouldn’t be allowed to post here.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT