According to the OWH, he will be making $800,000 per year. Doesn't seem like much of a surprise to me.
Next year?
It will be interesting IF Dana H. joins as an analyst whenever the coaching carousel settles down and if he does come on board as an analyst what he would be making.According to the OWH, he will be making $800,000 per year. Doesn't seem like much of a surprise to me.
I'd probably take that...going from 9/14 to 10/18 with a tougher schedule and the 4 teams added to the conference were all in the top 5 of the Pac12 for total offense last year.Next year?
I’d be curious to see what this board expects from the offense in terms of scoring and efficiency in 2024.
My guess is we’ll be somewhere around 10th in the conference
It would represent a first step in an upward trajectoryI'd probably take that...going from 9/14 to 10/18 with a tougher schedule and the 4 teams added were all in the top 5 of the Pac12 for total offense last year.
The most important numbers an offense can produce are:EDIT: my numbers are total offense and you said scoring + efficiency. my bad if there's that much difference.
It's a critical element that people don't always realize when sometimes they want certain "star" assistants. Star assistants are not helpful IF they don't fit in to the culture and can't get along with the rest of the coaches.
Wait, did you just attempt to educate me?The most important numbers an offense can produce are:
Yards per play
3rd down conversion %
Red zone TD %
That’s what I mean when I say efficiency, but it’s probably not fair for me to ask people here to think about more advanced metrics in context of our team and our league, so total offense and PPG will do just fine (although each can be a little noisy given a 12 game sample)
Maybe this guy talked to Trev.It will be interesting IF Dana H. joins as an analyst whenever the coaching carousel settles down and if he does come on board as an analyst what he would be making.
No. My football knowledge pales in comparison to yours.Wait, did you just attempt to educate me?
I would add turnovers/game to that but your suggested metrics allow for the more deliberate offense we’re running now.The most important numbers an offense can produce are:
Yards per play
3rd down conversion %
Red zone TD %
That’s what I mean when I say efficiency, but it’s probably not fair for me to ask people here to think about more advanced metrics in context of our team and our league, so total offense and PPG will do just fine (although each can be a little noisy given a 12 game sample)
Good one and agreedI would add turnovers/game to that but your suggested metrics allow for the more deliberate offense we’re running now.
That's an interesting article, thanks for the link. But I think the article makes an incorrect link between funding analyst positions and funding NIL. Analysts are paid by the school and the school cannot pay for NIL. Different funding sources. In Nebraska's case, the analysts would be paid out of the budget surplus of unspent funds. Those funds CANNOT used for NIL.
Cutting down on turnovers is huge and without any question woukd improve our scoring average immensely…I would add turnovers/game to that but your suggested metrics allow for the more deliberate offense we’re running now.
Love the energy and the drawl. One of the things that bugs me about Sat is that he sounds like he talks in slow motion, lacks some fire.
giveaways per game is the most important stat in a Satt lead offense.The most important numbers an offense can produce are:
Yards per play
3rd down conversion %
Red zone TD %
That’s what I mean when I say efficiency, but it’s probably not fair for me to ask people here to think about more advanced metrics in context of our team and our league, so total offense and PPG will do just fine (although each can be a little noisy given a 12 game sample)
O please satt has never once fumbled himself or specifically instructed his players to throw INTSIf for
giveaways per game is the most important stat in a Satt lead offense.