Tell me not to touch will yA
Going biblical. I believe a young David repelled evil by playing beautiful music.
It is used as antiparasitic. It doesn’t work for Covid.
N Engl J Med. 2022;386(18):1721. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
Control the media, control the message. It's a reason why quality has declined so much.Shapiro put out a short detailing all the people who tried to have that interview cancelled before it happened...inc a lot of our elected leaders.
Amazing when you pay people for doing the right thing
Control the media, control the message. It's a reason why quality has declined so much.
Pushing them for health issues, or death, down the line just to make sure they get their kickback from a drug company? Yeah... Ok.Amazing when you pay people for doing the right thing
J Infect. 2024 Apr; 88(4): None.Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of 266 studies
Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of 266 studiesc19ivm.org
Anecdotes from my own personal experience. And I’m not alone. It may be fine for you in your 40s sitting in cell Block D Taking furtive glances at your phone at Jo Bobs Twitter feed To believe whatever you want about Covid because you’re in a low risk group. But it is not OK for the millions of Americans, who are in high risk groups, the elderly, the overweight, the immunocompromised. Smokers, diabetics, etc. Joe Bob’s Twitter feed did not reflect the average physicians Experience, taking care of people who were really sick with Covid. And it was not what studies done by respected people, and published in respective journals showed in terms of the treatments you advocate, and the vaccinations that you choose to reject.Anecdotes for MSM that fit shameful talking points from the last 5 years by a fcktarded fake "health professional."
If you're a doctor and after the last 4+ years you haven't been able to reevaluate and acknowledge how poorly and incorrectly it was handled you're a shitty doctor who watches way too much of the 24 hr news channels.
It's honestly a shame we have people who were sick and had to seek help who even had the possiblity of ending up with a POS like you.
I bet you even put your pronouns in your emails.
The sad thing is you weren't alone. You went along with the crowd. Hope you felt good about being a little follower.
Yawn. I don’t really care. I do like telling the truth.if you're trying to convince people you're a complete loon, its working
Yawn. I don’t really care. I do like telling the truth.
Huh? You can’t take some phantom high road after you throw childish insults at other posters left and right.Yawn. I don’t really care. I do like telling the truth.
Pumping babies full of a fake vax for something they're at near zero risk for is not "doing the right thing" except to criminal frauds. Did you go to the Mengele school of medicine? You're worse than I imagined.Amazing when you pay people for doing the right thing
Truth = lying, gaslighting, fraud to you.Yawn. I don’t really care. I do like telling the truth.
J Infect. 2024 Apr; 88(4): None.
doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106130
PMCID: PMC10981761
PMID: 38431155
Ivermectin for COVID-19 in adults in the community (PRINCIPLE): An open, randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial of short- and longer-term outcomes
The primary analysis included 8811 SARS-CoV-2 positive participants (median symptom duration 5 days), randomised to ivermectin (n = 2157), usual care (n = 3256), and other treatments (n = 3398)
Interpretation
Ivermectin for COVID-19 is unlikely to provide clinically meaningful improvement in recovery, hospital admissions, or longer-term outcomes. Further trials of ivermectin for SARS-Cov-2 infection in vaccinated community populations appear unwarranted.
These dudes are for from Oxford, so what the F do they know?
@61 definitely called the Covid hotline to turn in his neighbors dinner party.Pumping babies full of a fake vax for something they're at near zero risk for is not "doing the right thing" except to criminal frauds. Did you go to the Mengele school of medicine? You're worse than I imagined.
J Infect. 2024 Apr; 88(4): None.
doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106130
PMCID: PMC10981761
PMID: 38431155
Ivermectin for COVID-19 in adults in the community (PRINCIPLE): An open, randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial of short- and longer-term outcomes
The primary analysis included 8811 SARS-CoV-2 positive participants (median symptom duration 5 days), randomised to ivermectin (n = 2157), usual care (n = 3256), and other treatments (n = 3398)
Interpretation
Ivermectin for COVID-19 is unlikely to provide clinically meaningful improvement in recovery, hospital admissions, or longer-term outcomes. Further trials of ivermectin for SARS-Cov-2 infection in vaccinated community populations appear unwarranted.
These dudes are for from Oxford, so what the F do they know?
He wishes he lived in Minnesota. The rest of us wish he'd move there.@61 definitely called the Covid hotline to turn in his neighbors dinner party.
I bet he would of been a huge fan of the hotline in 1930s Germany
They're so mad the platforms that matter are changing.Nah, you like bragging about how smart you think you sound, in reality, you sound like a loon and aren't changing a single mind about, anything. In fact, I'm now more convinced than ever you're full of shit and i'd never take anything you say serious.
It's probably Walz.@61 definitely called the Covid hotline to turn in his neighbors dinner party.
I bet he would of been a huge fan of the hotline in 1930s Germany
Commie POS.It's probably Walz.
Show me a sufficiently powered causal study that shows ivermectin providing a higher (or even the same) treatment effect than any of the standard treatments used during Covid and I will apologize for calling you a troglodyte, you troglodyte! You folks brains have been rotted out! It's 2024!Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 105 studies
105 ivermectin COVID-19 controlled studies. 85% improvement for prophylaxis, p < 0.0001. 61% improvement for early treatment, p < 0.0001. 40% improvement for late treatment, p < 0.0001. ivmmetac19ivm.org
Abstract
Statistically significant lower risk is seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant for higher quality studies.64 studiesfrom 58 independent teamsin 27 different countriesshow significant improvements.
I can show you people who died because of the vax.Show me a sufficiently powered causal study that shows ivermectin providing a higher (or even the same) treatment effect than any of the standard treatments used during Covid and I will apologize for calling you a troglodyte, you troglodyte! You folks brains have been rotted out! It's 2024!
So you can't show me any study? Apparently you have a lot to choose from in that "meta-analysis"... It shouldn't be hard, bud!I can show you people who died because of the vax.
I can't show you people who died of ivermectin prescription. Because it doesn't exist.
You're free to look through the 200+ studies and see how the meta-analysis arrived at their conclusion.
Jfc. You're just as dumb and illiterate as ever.So you can't show me any study? Apparently you have a lot to choose from in that "meta-analysis"... It shouldn't be hard, bud!
Just tell me one of the RCTs in the "meta analysis" that is properly powered and reflects a treatment effect equal to or greater than existing treatments used during Covid.Jfc. You're just as dumb and illiterate as ever.
The bystander's armbar needs some fine tuning, but it was kind of cool.