I don’t think there is anybody on here that isn’t excited or behind SF. This is a discussion board and it is for discussing differences in how people view the program. This idea that if someone somehow disagrees with you they are against you has completely taken over our society and it is ridiculous.
The
double standard as CheeseRunza wants to say
is actually an interesting discussion. It is always fun to see why people think the way they do, especially when they share a common interest. I think oldjar asked why it matters what the vocal minority thinks, that it is important because whether or not you want to admit it, they have a large impact on decisions. There are examples all over society. And if you look at random polls (yes unscientific) taken during and even after the season last year, many were still in favor of giving Riley more time. But there were also a very vocal bunch who basically threatened to stop supporting the program, which also had at least some impact on the decisions made. So what’s the point? I think it should also be completely fair to criticize SF if and when he does things wrong and he should also be judged the same as Riley after 2-3 years. If the program is stalled or slides, there is no reason the hire shouldn’t be questioned. I asked the question earlier, but what happens if he loses to NIU in 2019? Should everyone stop believing and then just go ahead and fire him then? That’s what happened with Riley...and there was still plenty of season left to play.
Scott Frost is a winner and I think he has everyone excited. That doesn’t mean he should somehow be given (imo) some extra arbitrary amount of time to get the program going. Riley was actually given a worse situation than Frost when he arrived. Players were so loyal to Pelini that the locker room was divided. Frost inherited an incredibly soft team who forgot how to win. They can be changed much easier because everyone wants to win. The Riley hire was strange, though, I agree. But just because he wasn’t what most wanted, that didn’t mean he didn’t deserve the time to get his program going, and I do actually think he was given enough time to prove it wasn’t going to happen. Moreso because he couldn’t control what was going on and was giving in and giving away to much control. But we can also make those same views of SF and all hope (for the entire program, fans, coaches, etc) that he leads us back to where we all want to go.
The main point is that just because some on here want to also hold SF to the same standards all other coaches have been held doesn’t mean we aren’t behind him. It just means he doesn’t get a pass because he is a Nebraskan.