If this was some grunt it’d be a non-story.In this case it seems to be what the company is worth since she is sueing MSU. Maybe she will sue Tucker as well.
She's a scumbag that was leading multiple married/rich men around by their balls while salivating over their dough.Cliff notes??
Like Mike Riley ???She seems to be a gold digger type woman who can find schools and men who aren’t very bright.
Like Mike Riley ???
Why don't people who call people mysogynists understand the definition?Much like the Lebron and Catlin Clark threads provided nice cozy places for the racists and misogynists to congregate this thread should likewise draw the misogynists like moths to a flame
If you cross reference both threads you see many are proud members of both groups
Mike Riley never met a populist virtue signal he didn't like.Like Mike Riley ???
The south and Eastern parts of Michigan are trash. Would not go without strong reason or live there.MSU is already paying for Nassar’s creepy shit too
I spend a fair amount of time in the state. Pockets of those areas are ok, but you are correct. The west side of the state is nice though. Lots of cool stuff if you are into the outdoors.The south and Eastern parts of Michigan are trash. Would not go without strong reason or live there.
It's like 2 different states in 1. North and West is totally different than the east and south.I spend a fair amount of time in the state. Pockets of those areas are ok, but you are correct. The west side of the state is nice though. Lots of cool stuff if you are into the outdoors.
Our entire society is based on the false premise: "women good men bad".So true. What a gold digging skank
You should post this in one of the dozens of girls basketball/volleyball threads on this siteOur entire society is based on the false premise: "women good men bad".
Where is posts doesn’t change the truth that for many, this is the thinking. Who sees his post shapes the responses not the truth of itYou should post this in one of the dozens of girls basketball/volleyball threads on this site
a person's perception is what shapes his post's "truth" or lack thereofWhere is posts doesn’t change the truth that for many, this is the thinking. Who sees his post shapes the responses not the truth of it
And the audience’s perception doesn’t make something more or less true, it makes the volume of people who are loud and wrong or loud and correct, simply more loud.a person's perception is what shapes his post's "truth" or lack thereof
nothing more, nothing less