A
anon_umk0ifu6vj6zi
Guest
Cool. Good talk.Fine, he's on your list. I don't really care to know the reasons why. But you shouldn't be surprised that people are questioning you since you listed a Heisman winner with no publicly known offenses. Especially since you're not willing to share your rationale when pressed on the issue.
Really wasn't trying to be on a high horse about Baldwin. I just thought the details of his situation deserved mentioning since they were so unusual and extreme. To throw him in with other "bad apples" didn't seem right, but certainly some ITT disagree.
Whatever your reasoning, I would still wager a guess that Alford deserves to be ahead of the four you mentioned. But to each their own.