Yeah I see that. They have hate in their hearts and that’s a them problem. And can’t stand to ever be wrong. Very common of beta male DNA.
Most Improved OL's
- Thread starter leodisflowers
- Start date
The topic is “most improved OL”
Yes, I’m blaming the OL coach for our poor OL play. No, that’s not controversial
Great - so you cherry picked one stat from one game. Iowa had more sacks. Great.
All while you completely ignore that Neb had more rushing and passing yards in the game. By a mile.
Seriously man. You’re not good at this stuff.
Poor OL play, sure. But he you both have gone to give him blame for the red zone, bad rushing, bad offense when there is way more than just an OL coach that goes into that. But anytime it gets brought up it’s “but Donnie, Donnie.” Many things are true at once, you want to deflect from the other truths.
What can you possibly hang your hat on as an enthusiastic uncle Donnie proponent?
What’s your argument that he’s good?
Statistically & developmentally he has produced jack shit despite boasting the longest tenure of any assistant we have
I'm starting to think his last name is Raiola too. Maybe he's one of the other many nepo hires with that name in our program.
This is what it sounds like after being intellectually dominated by me.
No bigger dipshit on this board than you. Congrats.
Some people just glom on to folks and I don’t get it.
We all should want the best for NU football at every position. Uncle Don sure as shit ain’t that and never will be.
Usually not great when recruits schedule more visits after meeting with their position coachOh crap - I’ve been doing the happy dance for a few days now.
And thanks to uncle don’s “recruiting prowess” we are in dire need for OL at every position
Ah, so we dominated them for the most part, but lost because of a couple key plays?
Love that you have to keep telling yourself this. Definitely not insecure over getting your shit pushed in 😆
You weren’t paying attention apparently. We absolutely dominated Iowa and lost on a couple key plays.
Seriously. Did you not watch the game?
Let’s be clear. Your ability to debate a topic couldn’t push through piss-wet toilet paper.
> we lost because of a couple key plays
> no you can’t say we lost because of that play that led to the game winning score
Can’t even keep your own argument straight, you silly bitch 😆
I know why you love considering yourself an expert at debate, you probably get stuck doing it in the mirror
Backs away from the LOS, chasing after defenders getting ready to crush the QB.
Brainlets like @HUSKERBILL have no problem with losing games like this.
Do you know the difference between “a couple” and and “one”?
You can lose the game on a couple plays. Usually in football it’s a game of inches as they say. And it isn’t one play that usually causes a loss. But a couple can.
You seem to have a hard time with processing details in a conversation.
I got paid to play football. Played for years. Now I coach. Been doing that for years. Had a dad with an NFL contract. Have a cousin that just led the NFL in a statistical category this season.
You probably played video games. I’d bet on it.
I'm glad we shit-canned the Special Teams coach who also played a part.
You could say we have "a couple" coaches that suck.
Didn't ask, don't care, don't believe, but definitely cringed.
