So this opinion you guys have that Paterno did something wrong. What is that based on?
1) The PA attorney general, Linda Kelly, praising Paterno for his appropriate actions.
2) The lead Sandusky prosecutor, Frank Fina, stating he found no evidence of a cover up
3) The former PA governor, Dick Thornburgh, who found Paterno acted appropriately.
4) The FBI expert on pedophilia, Jim Clemente, who found Paterno acted appropriately.
5) The recently released NCAA guidelines on dealing with suspected abuse that exactly mirror Paterno's actions.
or
6) The opinions of disgraced former FBI agent Louis Freeh, who didn't interview any of the key witnesses, who's opinion is based on 2 vague emails that Paterno didn't send or receive, who's report has been discredited by basically anyone who has ever read it, and has pretty much screwed up anything he has ever touched (FIFA, Deepwater Horizon, Richard Jewell, PSU, etc)
I'd really like to know, because Bob Costas doesn't think Paterno was actively involved in a cover up...and I am not smarter than him. All the above is fact and readily verified with a little help from google. I may be a crazy cult member, but I have an open mind if you can explain to me why Paterno is guilty despite all the facts presented above, I'd like to learn. I'd like to open it up to all PSU administrators... who haven't had their trial yet, and thus haven't been convicted of anything.
Seems that if you really cared about the victims you would do some research, because keeping the spotlight on the wrong people doesn't fix the problem. The CPW, CYS and TSM let Sandusky roam free for years, and have received zero scrutiny. They approved Jerry for multiple adoptions, they cleared Jerry in 1998, and ignored the report PSU made about Sandusky in 2001. So by blaming the wrong people, you are actually an enabler.