ADVERTISEMENT

If you think we can get at least 10 wins in the regular season...

image.png


This is what you get when Huskers fans are drinking way too much Husker Kool-Aid, they won't win 10 games this season, the Huskers will be lucky to win 5 games!!!!!

This is based on reading OWH Husker articles........

O6edYtb.jpg
 
It doesn't matter why there is a new coach, fired or took a new job, most of the time the following year sees the record go down here is how it has played out the last two years!
COACHING CHANGES IN 2013
Team 2012 record 2013 record 2014 record
Auburn 3-9 12-2 8-4
Arkansas 4-8 3-9 6-6
Tennessee 5-7 5--7 6-6
Kentucky 2-10 2-10 5-7
Wisconsin 8-6 9-4 11-3
Purdue 6-7 1-11 3-9
Syracuse 8-5 7-6 3-9
NC State 7-6 3-9 7-5
Boston College 2-10 7-6 7-5
Colorado 1-11 4-8 2-10
Oregon 12-1 11-2 11-2
Cal 3-9 1-11 5-7
Texas Tech 8-5 8-5 4-8
NON Power 5 team
Team 2012 record 2013 record 2014 record
Cincinnati 10-3 9-4 8-3
So. Florida 3-9 2-10 4-8
Utah St. 11-2 9-5 9-4
Nevada 7-6 4-8 7-5
San Jose St 11-2 6-6 3-9
NIU 12-2 12-2 10-2
W. Michigan 4-8 1-11 8-4
Kent St. 11-3 4-8 2-9
FIU 3-9 1-11 4-8
La Tech 9-3 4-8 8-4
So Miss 0-12 1-11 3-9
UTEP 3-9 2-10 7-5
Idaho 1-11 1-11 1-10

COACHING CHANGES IN 2014
Team 2013 record 2014 record
Penn State 7-5 7-6
Washington 9-4 8-6
Vanderbilt 9-4 3-9
Louisville 12-1 9-4
Texas 8-5 6-7
Wake Forest 4-8 3-9
USC 10-4 9-4
NON POWER 5
Bowling Green 10-4 8-6
Wyoming 5-7 4-8
Army 3-9 4-7
Ga. Southern 7-4 9-3
FAU 6-6 3-9
Boise St. 8-5 12-2
Miami OH 0-12 2-10
E. Michigan 2-10 2-10
UAB 2-10 6-6
UMass 1-11 3-9
UConn 3-9 2-10
W. Kentucky 8-4 8-5
Ark St 8-5 7-6

Tell me what you see! Of all of these team I would say situation-wise Nebraska would probably resemble either Washington or Texas of last year or NC State 2013.
What do I see? I see zero relevance to our situation but let's look at your numbers.

First thing I see is that non power 5 teams do not belong on any list even remotely relevant to us. Usually, they have erratic W/L records year over year and, specifically, they universally have no claim to high quality replacement coaches. Good luck using anything from their records to explain what will happen here.

Secondly, for 2013 you listed 13 power 5 replacement coaches and of those...
3 were +/- 0 wins over the prior year
6 were -14 cumulative wins (14 less wins) than the prior year
4 were +18 cumulative wins (18 more wins) than the prior year.

Seven of the 13 had equal or more wins than the prior year - more than half of the new hires sustained or improved the prior year's win count. And the whole 13 totaled four more wins than the prior coaches had.

2014 more closely matches your point (irrelevant though it is). Here, you've listed seven new power 5 coaches...
1 was +/- 0 wins over the prior year
6 were -14cumulative wins (14 less wins) than the prior year
0 were + any cumulative wins than the prior year.

All in all, 2013 was a plus for new coaches and 2014 was a minus. This tell us nothing as 2013 could just as easily be replicated this year as not. The fact that 2014 could also be repeated is irrelevant as is the whole exercise. The fact that seven of these 20 new hires succeeded in their first year is all it takes to know it can be done.

And also, in each of these cases, local issues ruled the day. Louisville lost Bridgewater, Texas faced a severe cultural change, etc, etc, etc.
 
I really don't know what to expect. It sure isn't much though with a new staff on board, more of a wait an see how things go approach.
 
I really don't know what to expect. It sure isn't much though with a new staff on board, more of a wait an see how things go approach.

Where have you been barney? Your handle is familiar from a poster years ago... same guy???
 
Were a Blue Blood original. Have you seen our stadium lately??? The Vatican doesn't have anything on us! We have such a special place that even Bo won a lot of games riding our coattails.

That is one of the most ridiculous comments I've read on this board in quite a while. You sound like an aggy.
 
That is one of the most ridiculous comments I've read on this board in quite a while. You sound like an aggy.

We invest top dollar in our product like a Blue Bloods can. Bad coaching has been our problem not an antiquated program.
 
Anyone who predicted 10 wins for any season under Riley knows nothing of football. I didn’t post in this thread but I’m sure I would have been pissed all over if I had for predicting a 6-6 season the first year but that is where I had them pegged.

All you had to do was base it on 20+ years of Riley’s coaching history. I can’t believe some of you thought a 62 year old tiger would change its stripes.
 
Did you see the records of all those '12 teams? That illustrates why those coaches were fired. . Mike Riley inherits a team which won 9 games including 10 players who have started games on defense and 8 players who have started games offensively.

Riley doesnt have a full rebuild. Secondly, all the c teams above improved because of experience. Nebraska has some inexperience depth at LB abd DE. But more than 70% of this roster has been in Lincoln at least 2 seasons.

This was also one of my favorite posts from this thread. Someone told me a couple weeks back that I was crazy for remembering the talk before Riley coached a game that it wasn't a full rebuild. Here's one such post (not calling you out Cornicator specifically, this was the consensue pre-BYU that whoever called me out on had selective amnesia).
 
This was also one of my favorite posts from this thread. Someone told me a couple weeks back that I was crazy for remembering the talk before Riley coached a game that it wasn't a full rebuild. Here's one such post (not calling you out Cornicator specifically, this was the consensue pre-BYU that whoever called me out on had selective amnesia).

Not sure your point. Riley didn't have a full rebuild. He fvcked it up on his own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mack In Motion
This was also one of my favorite posts from this thread. Someone told me a couple weeks back that I was crazy for remembering the talk before Riley coached a game that it wasn't a full rebuild. Here's one such post (not calling you out Cornicator specifically, this was the consensue pre-BYU that whoever called me out on had selective amnesia).
Sucks. I always kinda liked Cornicator’s posts.

Funny, it’s amazing to watch the ebb and flow of posters whom reflect the opinions of whatever faction supports the current coaching administration. 4 times now.

It’s almost as if Nebraska is trying to beat me into complete and total apathy.
 
Not sure your point. Riley didn't have a full rebuild. He fvcked it up on his own.

I agree wholeheartedly. Some other posters attacked me a couple weeks ago that it was a massive rebuild and that anyone claiming it wasn't a full rebuild was delusional. It was the consensus that it was not a full rebuild prior to BYU. So again, not calling you out at all.
 
Is the cult still going strong or can you finally admit that Riley and his staff sucked?

Also this thread is hilarious in retrospect.
The only thing funny is how bad our fans are. Digging this thread up is another example. When we are sitting at about 5-5 next year, please dig up this thread again.
 
This was also one of my favorite posts from this thread. Someone told me a couple weeks back that I was crazy for remembering the talk before Riley coached a game that it wasn't a full rebuild. Here's one such post (not calling you out Cornicator specifically, this was the consensue pre-BYU that whoever called me out on had selective amnesia).

What’s wrong with Cornicator’s post? It was dead on accurate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ridge22
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT