I didn’t make a moral victory argument.
You are kind of pathetic and your reading comprehension sucks. Baylor was in bad shape after the scandals under Briles. If you don’t understand that, you are an idiot. I can’t help you. Ask your dad to explain it to you.
Him going 11-3 in his third season there after the Briles scandals is impressive. Again, if you don’t understand that, you are an idiot.
Buddy, why are you getting so emotional over someone disagreeing? Don’t post if you’re gonna cry about a conflicting opinion. Calm downYou probably don’t understand this either, but quotation marks means you are claiming I directly said what is between them. I didn’t. Don’t be an idiot.
Who in your mind—that is realistic—is better than Rhule? And why?
Be a big boy and form a thought on your own.
I do not think Rhule is a bad coach. I think he has a clearly defined ceiling that is about the same as Pelini’s.
0-11 against teams that are ranked.
and so what on the scandals? are you thinking he recruits grads and elementary teachers? Baylor is in a hot bed of talent and offers the ability to start right away, just like UCF.
the quotations are in reference to a common argument for keeping Frost last year. I’m not attributing them to you, I’m making the comparison with how impressed you were that he lost to Oklahoma and Georgia, when we just got rid of the champion of moral victories in Scott Frost.
Leipold is a better choice because he took over a winless shithole, and will most likely amass more ranked wins by the end of the year than Rhule had over his entire tenure at Baylor.