Originally posted by shine003:
Originally posted by huskerbaseball13:
There was no discussion. It was one poster of their rocker. At the end of the day the Big East once again proves they don't belong in the same conversation as the other top leagues.
Posted from
Rivals Mobile
Look, I'm not a Big East fan or anything, but to say they're not in the same conversation with some of the other conferences simply because Villanova lost to NC State (who holds wins over Duke, Louisville, and UNC) is just wrong. Outside of Villanova, only Georgetown should have made the sweet 16 by seeding.
And before we jump the gun, the Big 10 could easily end up with only one sweet 16 team. The Big 12 is only going to get one or two. The SEC is only getting one. So trying to make sweeping generalizations about the conference based on sweet 16 teams is problematic. Was the Big East overrated by their BPI that claimed they were the second best conference? Yep. Sure was. But most of us already knew that. But it's still a good conference. It's just not the ACC.