I would like to order more of that.they ran the ball from 2014-2016 at west va
other than those 3 years, his offenses have ranked comfortably outside the top half in the country in rushing
they always score points, though. so that's a plus.
I would like to order more of that.they ran the ball from 2014-2016 at west va
other than those 3 years, his offenses have ranked comfortably outside the top half in the country in rushing
they always score points, though. so that's a plus.
Leach always said he would only recruit HS QB's that had a high completion % because "that is not really something you coach".this is true
Leach's quarterback coaching philosophy famously started and ended with:
"You, the guy with the ball. Throw it to the guy who's open".
or
"Well, just throw it to the guy who's fricking open!"
Hahaha! Just a camera crew following around Satt?!?!Do we get a Chasing 3 video showing the awkward vibe around the football offices this week? Has this EVER happened before?
He's in timeout over in the corner.Hahaha! Just a camera crew following around Satt?!?!
No way Tony White gets a head coaching offer. His defense this year has been feast or famine. No consistency at all.Looks as though Rhule may be lining up his OC for next year with a head start now. Even with Snow, maybe Rhule knows TW will be gone next yr for a HC coaching position.
This would be hilarious.Hahaha! Just a camera crew following around Satt?!?!
Yes please.They had a guy named Tavon Austin that was about the size of Barney that played both WR/RB and had 1,200 receiving and 600 rushing his senior year.
I'd rather have an Ahman Green type, line up under center and beat the defense to a pulp - but we need to run the ball somehow regardless.Y
Yes please.
Do we get a Chasing 3 video showing the awkward vibe around the football offices this week? Has this EVER happened before?
Agree on the feast or famine, but our defensive effort has been erratic at best. Not sure it's all scheme.No way Tony White gets a head coaching offer. His defense this year has been feast or famine. No consistency at all.
The Indianapolis Colts drafted Anthony Richardson. Amazing that an NFL franchise doesn’t even know this, but it’s true. You really can’t teach accuracyLeach always said he would only recruit HS QB's that had a high completion % because "that is not really something you coach".
That always seemed really simple and really obvious.
Richardson needed at least one or two more years in college — and NFL owners dumped NFL Europe (to save their precious cents), which would have been an option.The Indianapolis Colts drafted Anthony Richardson. Amazing that an NFL franchise doesn’t even know this, but it’s true. You really can’t teach accuracy
Agree on the feast or famine, but our defensive effort has been erratic at best. Not sure it's all scheme.
He's just not that good.I’m not even sure Raiola can compete with Jackson mahomes
You may be right, he didn't set the world on fire as a frosh. I would never write someone off after their freshman year but he appears to be a middle of the pack or lower BIG qb. Like it or not that's the reality so far. He can change that narrative and maybe it is all Satts fault. Maybe not.He's just not that good.
Every program in the conference would take Raiola with zero hesitation. He wouldn't step into a starting role instantly at all of them but his talent and potential is not in question.You may be right, he didn't set the world on fire as a frosh. I would never write someone off after their freshman year but he appears to be a middle of the pack or lower BIG qb. Like it or not that's the reality so far. He can change that narrative and maybe it is all Satts fault. Maybe not.
I didn't say they wouldn't. I didn't say I'm not glad to have him. I said as of today he is avg or below. That is a fact. I also said he can change that. Also a fact. If he has 4 years parallel with the one he is currently having it would be a major bust. If he shows upward trajectory and improves ( I suspect he will) then he changes the narrative on him.Every program in the conference would take Raiola with zero hesitation. He wouldn't step into a starting role instantly at all of them but his talent and potential is not in question.
I agree with everything you said about his performance so far. Personally I have no question whatsoever that it's Satt's fault and that Raiola has great days ahead of him here, assuming he doesn't bail to a competent program. I doubt someone like Dana Holgorsen would be signing on here if it weren't for the presence of QB talent like we currently have. I love HH but I don't think DH would see him as someone to build a coaching resume with.I didn't say they wouldn't. I didn't say I'm not glad to have him. I said as of today he is avg or below. That is a fact. I also said he can change that. Also a fact. If he has 4 years parallel with the one he is currently having it would be a major bust. If he shows upward trajectory and improves ( I suspect he will) then he changes the narrative on him.
Anyone who has watched him play know the potential is there. Thay also know he has made many mistakes and missed guys open, not taken chances when he should have and taken a few he shouldn't.
I also said maybe it's all Satts fault. Maybe another O coordinator schemes guys open better and makes the game easier.