ADVERTISEMENT

Grant Seagren and others to the portal as well

Well Huskers.com has him at 5-3. I don’t think they hate him or want to smear his record. The way you cherry pick stats to support your Haarberg savior delusion is akin to the way Iowa celebrates their fake accomplishments.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: arf_man
You realize you're gonna make this pretty easy for me.
You don’t even need to. He got called out on his 5-2 Haarberg delusion so he is moving the goalposts. King, you are trying to promote some sort of inane Haarberg Messiah project and you are flat out wrong. Yes, Haarberg did the best he could in a dumpster fire left by Frost. He was a subpar college quarterback that tried to shoulder a hell of an unfair load. He did admirably. But he still was not good. By eye test or stats. I don’t care if you admit it or not. He is a subpar quarterback. I hope he can be a good tight end.
 
You don’t even need to. He got called out on his 5-2 Haarberg delusion so he is moving the goalposts. King, you are trying to promote some sort of inane Haarberg Messiah project and you are flat out wrong. Yes, Haarberg did the best he could in a dumpster fire left by Frost. He was a subpar college quarterback that tried to shoulder a hell of an unfair load. He did admirably. But he still was not good. By eye test or stats. I don’t care if you admit it or not. He is a subpar quarterback. I hope he can be a good tight end.
Everyone, including HH, has moved on from this except for Kong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neb79
You don’t even need to. He got called out on his 5-2 Haarberg delusion so he is moving the goalposts. King, you are trying to promote some sort of inane Haarberg Messiah project and you are flat out wrong. Yes, Haarberg did the best he could in a dumpster fire left by Frost. He was a subpar college quarterback that tried to shoulder a hell of an unfair load. He did admirably. But he still was not good. By eye test or stats. I don’t care if you admit it or not. He is a subpar quarterback. I hope he can be a good tight end.
Thanks, I always need a newbie to explain things for me.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dinglefritz
So, we’re dependent on O linemen developed by other coaches?
Not really but playing time against elite defenses sure helps development. EVERY team in America is chasing O linemen developed by other programs. Apparently Okie St and Wisconsin like one of our back up walk on tackles to recruit him in the portal.
 
Thanks, I always need a newbie to explain things for me.
That wasn’t meant to you so much as Limp Dong King Kong. I know I shouldn’t humor him but I also can’t let him get away with spraying his bullshit on the wall of this site without at least calling out the blatant stuff. I guess I should just put him on ignore like many do.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: king_kong_
That wasn’t meant to you so much as Limp Dong King Kong. I know I shouldn’t humor him but I also can’t let him get away with spraying his bullshit on the wall of this site without at least calling out the blatant stuff. I guess I should just put him on ignore like many do.
Only guy I’ve got on ignore and now no longer on BP medication.

It’s the best!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neb79
You realize you're gonna make this pretty easy for me.
go for it.

please explain why a QB who left a game tied after 3 drives deserves to have any outcome of said game reflect on his record when it doesn't for a starting pitcher or a hockey goalie or any other team sport with individual win statistics.
 
5-3 or 5-2 his winning percentage still stands as the best in the Rhule Nebraska QB’s.
I wonder if @Neb79 will be able to read this through all his tears?

love it when people who have proven zero points and have only shown their ass say things like "called out"
 
go for it.

please explain why a QB who left a game tied after 3 drives deserves to have any outcome of said game reflect on his record.
3 drives with 2 interceptions (one called back by penalty), a sack and 1/5 completions. That QB? You think it was a great performance? You think he should be absolved of that to enhance his record? I see you are no longer bringing up the fact that he was quarterbacking the squad until 10 minutes and change left in the 2nd quarter. Are you finally acknowledging that he played well into the second quarter as I first asserted?
 
I wonder if @Neb79 will be able to read this through all his tears?

love it when people who have proven zero points and have only shown their ass say things like "called out"
What’s your point? You want Haarberg as our QB this year? I already acknowledged that he did ok with the hand he was dealt. We now have better options. Let’s enjoy them.
 
3 drives with 2 interceptions (one called back by penalty), a sack and 1/5 completions. That QB? You think it was a great performance? You think he should be absolved of that to enhance his record? I see you are no longer bringing up the fact that he was quarterbacking the squad until 10 minutes and change left in the 2nd quarter. Are you finally acknowledging that he played well into the second quarter as I first asserted?
wait - do interceptions called back by penalty count as INTs? or are you just "spraying bullshit"?

HH's last snap of the game was taken 1 minute and 16 seconds into the 2nd quarter

here's the tape to prove it, retard:

 
3 drives with 2 interceptions (one called back by penalty), a sack and 1/5 completions. That QB? You think it was a great performance? You think he should be absolved of that to enhance his record? I see you are no longer bringing up the fact that he was quarterbacking the squad until 10 minutes and change left in the 2nd quarter. Are you finally acknowledging that he played well into the second quarter as I first asserted?
wait - do interceptions called back by penalty count as INTs? or are you just "spraying bullshit"?

HH's last snap of the game was taken 1 minute and 13 seconds into the 2nd quarter

here's the tape to prove it, retard:

yeah, and Sims came in at 10.5 minutes. Because the defense played. Because defenses play in addition to offenses, ******. I know how football works. Haarberg is the quarterback until someone else comes in.
 
So you want Haarberg as QB? You changed the subject. Answer the question.
literally what the f*ck are you talking about?

we've all moved on, pal. it's 2025. I haven't posted about HH being the QB since he stopped being the QB. you're the one going off on some idiotic nonsensical diatribe in this thread.

you must be stuck at your trauma age. that happens to women like you sometimes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RBigredMax
literally what the f*ck are you talking about?

we've all moved on, pal. it's 2025. I haven't posted about HH being the QB since he stopped being the QB. you're the one going off on some idiotic nonsensical diatribe in this thread.

you must be stuck at your trauma age. that happens to women like you sometimes.
So you don’t want him as QB? Then why are you still glorifying him as the greatest qb in 7 game Nebraska history despite him playing in the 8th game and sucking horribly?
 
So you don’t want him as QB? Then why are you still glorifying him as the greatest qb in 7 game Nebraska history despite him playing in the 8th game and sucking horribly?
You know what? F off. You win. I’m blocking you. I don’t know if you are retarded, your mother didn’t love you, or if you were dropped on your head. You aren’t worth arguing over.
 
So you don’t want him as QB? Then why are you still glorifying him as the greatest qb in 7 game Nebraska history despite him playing in the 8th game and sucking horribly?
"glorifying". I accurately posted his record as the starter. we've had many QBs go 7-0 in stretches.

you have lost your mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InMotion
This is one of the oddest thread switches ever.
am I crazy?

what's wrong with this dude? he just blew a gasket for no reason whatsoever.

4peZ.gif
 
You guys crack me up..

Kong, smart people understand what you're saying. I can't believe this still going.
I don't even know what's happening here.

the guy is now replying to himself?

I think we just witnessed a full blown breakdown in real time.

Ts & Ps @Neb79. hope you get the help you need.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InMotion
"glorifying". I accurately posted his record as the starter. we've had many QBs go 7-0 in stretches.

you have lost your mind.
Did he start the Maryland game? If so he would have been 5-3 as a starter.

Northern Ill - W - 1-0
La Tech - W - 2-0
Michigan - L - 2-1
Illinois - W - 3-1
Northwestern - W - 4-1
Purdue - W - 5-1
Michigan St L - 5-2
Maryland - L - 5-3
 
  • Like
Reactions: timnsun
Did he start the Maryland game? If so he would have been 5-3 as a starter.

Northern Ill - W - 1-0
La Tech - W - 2-0
Michigan - L - 2-1
Illinois - W - 3-1
Northwestern - W - 4-1
Purdue - W - 5-1
Michigan St L - 5-2
Maryland - L - 5-3
So if he’d have played 1 single play, the same applies?

He left the game tied, the next QB took the ball with the game still tied

Makes much more sense to treat QBs like pitchers when it comes to W-L record

If you want to say the team went 5-3 in games HH started, that would be more accurate, but to say he was 5-3 is not.

Acknowledging this discussion is superfluous.
 
go for it.

please explain why a QB who left a game tied after 3 drives deserves to have any outcome of said game reflect on his record when it doesn't for a starting pitcher or a hockey goalie or any other team sport with individual win statistics.
Right or wrong that’s just the way football records its QBs .
 
  • Like
Reactions: king_kong_
Did he start the Maryland game? If so he would have been 5-3 as a starter.

Northern Ill - W - 1-0
La Tech - W - 2-0
Michigan - L - 2-1
Illinois - W - 3-1
Northwestern - W - 4-1
Purdue - W - 5-1
Michigan St L - 5-2
Maryland - L - 5-3
Nope, according to Kong, his 1/5 start with 2 interceptions in 1/3 of game play does not count. He only counts the games he played in that he won to suit his narrative of greatest 5-2 QB ever. Despite that he was moved off the position due to better talent.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: king_kong_
go for it.

please explain why a QB who left a game tied after 3 drives deserves to have any outcome of said game reflect on his record when it doesn't for a starting pitcher or a hockey goalie or any other team sport with individual win statistics.
How about if a pitcher starts the game, throws one pitch and hits the batter but has to then leave because he tore his fingernail?
So the runner becomes an earned run if he scores, (its irrelevant if its earned or not), but the reliever comes in and allows that run to score and the games ends up 1-0. The starter is charged with the run.

Who takes the loss? The starting pitcher who only faced one batter.

To win he has to throw 5 complete innings.

The rules are pretty clear kong.
 
How about if a pitcher starts the game, throws one pitch and hits the batter but has to then leave because he tore his fingernail?
So the runner becomes an earned run if he scores, (its irrelevant if its earned or not), but the reliever comes in and allows that run to score and the games ends up 1-0.

Who takes the loss? The starting pitcher who only faced one batter.

To win he has to throw 5 complete innings.

The rules are pretty clear kong.
Now do this for a pitcher who leaves a tie game, which is what we are discussing.

Believe you’re proving my point.
 
Now do this for a pitcher who leaves a tie game, which is what we are discussing.

Believe you’re proving my point.
What is being discussed is who the starting QB was in the game which became a loss.

When they do QB stats for career as a starting QB, they don't have exceptions for if a QB left the game early or the games was 4 overtimes. If he started the game, and his team lost, its a loss for that QB's record. Period.

They don't say QB A's record as a QB is X-X they say his record as a starting QB is......
 
Last edited:
Nope, according to Kong, his 1/5 start with 2 interceptions in 1/3 of game play does not count. He only counts the games he played in that he won to suit his narrative of greatest 5-2 QB ever. Despite that he was moved off the position due to better talent.
Seek help.

This sentence is so stupid and nonsensical it’s laugh out loud funny.
 
What is being discussed is who the starting QB was in the game which became a loss.

When they do QB stats for career as a starting QB, they don't have exceptions for if a QB left the game early or the games was 4 overtimes. If he started the game, and his team lost, it’s a loss for that QB's record. Period.
If your entire point is “that’s just how they do it”, I have to admit, I’d be a little underwhelmed.

I was expecting examples.

Fact is it makes more sense to apply the record to players who actually played and contributed to the outcome, just like your baseball example which further illustrated my point.

Maryland game is an L for Sims, who lost the game. Had purdy brought us back, it’d be a W on his ledger.
 
I think HH is going to impress and be a valuable asset at tight end. I appreciate the no win spot he was in when playing Qb. He was the bring the lunch pail to work kinda guy. Glad he is not Qb1 anymore but appreciate the difficult spot he was in and he just went out and played .
 
If your entire point is “that’s just how they do it”, I have to admit, I’d be a little underwhelmed.

I was expecting examples.

Fact is it makes more sense to apply the record to players who actually played and contributed to the outcome, just like your baseball example which further illustrated my point.

Maryland game is an L for Sims, who lost the game. Had purdy brought us back, it’d be a W on his ledger.
JFC are you that thick headed? That’s the way football lists the All W-L records of QBs they do it by games started . Sorry that you don’t agree.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT