Have to think hosting, say, NDSU for a few days during camp would be very beneficial for all parties involved
Why don’t college teams do this? Is it against the “rules”?
Why don’t college teams do this? Is it against the “rules”?
Money would be the biggest issue..Like any thing else..Have to think hosting, say, NDSU for a few days during camp would be very beneficial for all parties involved
Why don’t college teams do this? Is it against the “rules”?
Where’s the issue? It’s a few hour bus ride and a few nights’ stay in the dorms.Money would be the biggest issue..Like any thing else..
You used NDSU as a example.. We could host them because we would have room for a team of that size, but traveling to Fargo is around 6 hours and they wouldn’t have enough room in their facilities for let’s say 85 players..Where’s the issue? It’s a few hour bus ride and a few nights’ stay in the dorms.
Practically zero cost
We pay northern illinois millions to come play us during the season
Well, yea, we wouldn’t go there. Just like we don’t play @ TroyYou used NDSU as a example.. We could host them because we would have room for a team of that size, but traveling to Fargo is around 6 hours and they wouldn’t have enough room in their facilities for let’s say 85 players..
nfl rosters have at least the same percentage of rookies and first year players as college football teams if not higherI also think teams are getting their freshman up to speed knowing the play book and technique and schemes..
College football isn’t like the NFL where players have been established on the teams they‘ve been on..
I’m only against if small schools have to go Northwestern. If they do that to their own players - who knows what they would do to others.nfl rosters have at least the same percentage of rookies and first year players as college football teams if not higher
I have no idea why anyone would be against this idea which would obviously help everyone get ready for the season
Only thing I can think of as to why nobody does it is there must be a “rule” against it
It’s a maximum of 90 for the NFL…If you include walkons which in our case we have around 110-120..nfl rosters have at least the same percentage of rookies and first year players as college football teams if not higher
I have no idea why anyone would be against this idea which would obviously help everyone get ready for the season
Only thing I can think of as to why nobody does it is there must be a “rule” against it
The partner is irrelevantWouldn't k-state, kansas or iowa state be better matches for a joint practice?
I've decided to stop using examples. You simply can't ask a hypothetical on this site without someone one upping the hypothetical.The partner is irrelevant
The question is why don’t they happen?
And you just answered the question why they don’t do it . You have a hour and number limit on practice in the NCAA.It’s a maximum of 90 for the NFL…If you include walkons which in our case we have around 110-120..
How long can you have practice in a day in the NFL compared to how long you have practice in College.. I know the NCAA only allows so many hours a day..
I don’t understand why a time limit would get in the way of this
3 days:
Day 1 joint practice
Day 2 scrimmage
Day 3 scrimmage
Same time as when practicing alone
Not like nfl teams are on the field for 6 straight hours, either
believe you are only allowed so many scrimmages also And this would only work in the spring. It’s not necessary the time limit it’s the practice limit. This is an interesting idea ..I just don’t believe the current practice rules would allow it.I don’t understand why a time limit would get in the way of this
3 days:
Day 1 joint practice
Day 2 scrimmage
Day 3 scrimmage
Same time as when practicing alone
Not like nfl teams are on the field for 6 straight hours, either
Scrimmaging wouldn’t be beneficial to the team?There is a huge difference in talent, understanding the game, level of preparedness etc. between the NFL and CFB.. Doing Scrimmages won't be beneficial to the team. A college freshman v a NFL rookie are 2 entirely different people.. the NFL is a job, CFB is not
When you're limited to how many practices and you have multiple new guys, young guys, putting in a new system, etc.. Running a scrimmage against someone without your guys understanding what's going on would not be a benefit.. Again, NFL v CFB players are 2 different worlds. CFB players don't come in understanding the complexity of playbooks, schemes, etc. but I'm not going to sit here and argue with you because we all know you're never wrongScrimmaging wouldn’t be beneficial to the team?
Quite the opinion
When exactly do you think guys understand what’s going on?When you're limited to how many practices and you have multiple new guys, young guys, putting in a new system, etc.. Running a scrimmage against someone without your guys understanding what's going on would not be a benefit.. Again, NFL v CFB players are 2 different worlds. CFB players don't come in understanding the complexity of playbooks, schemes, etc. but I'm not going to sit here and argue with you because we all know you're never wrong
Depends on the team and coach I'd imagine.. It's not a one size fits all answerWhen exactly do you think guys understand what’s going on?
Your butt seems hurtDepends on the team and coach I'd imagine.. It's not a one size fits all answer. But again enjoy, you're again like always
Naw, you're just annoying as **** and seem to think whatever you say is gospelYour butt seems hurt
Get over it, adult man. It’s game day!
“Cfb isn’t a job”Naw, you're just annoying as **** and seem to think whatever you say is gospel
CFB isn't a job for players that's a fact.. And scrimmages in the fall based on the schedule you posted I don't think would be beneficial“Cfb isn’t a job”
“Scrimmaging doesn’t benefit the team”
Direct quotes from the gospel of stupid
So college football is a hobby for players?CFB isn't a job for players that's a fact.. And scrimmages in the fall based on the schedule you posted I don't think would be beneficial
Correct. The NCAA limits the number of "contests" that a football team can have, and "contest" is defined to include a joint practice.Based on what I can find I don't think it's allowed by the NCAA currently: https://footballscoop.com/news/new-proposal-would-allow-joint-practices-fall-camp-fbs
Sounds like it's definitely a topic of interest: https://www.wboy.com/goldandbluenation/could-joint-practices-be-part-of-the-future-of-college-football/#:~:text=Of those 25 teams, 10,rage at the next level.
Possibly because the corches would fear injuries?The partner is irrelevant
The question is why don’t they happen?
That article I posted the coach (Neal Brown) said they probably wouldn't want to scrimmages but do 7-on-7 etc type stuff. I know for sure that teams get sick of seeing the same damn faces for weeks on end.Possibly because the corches would fear injuries?
Yes, they happen all the time internally, but would think that higher level of engagement with more pi$$ and vinegar: make it prohibitive.
That said, I like the idea.
🌽
I figured some kind of “ncaa rule” was the reason they don’t take place todayBased on what I can find I don't think it's allowed by the NCAA currently: https://footballscoop.com/news/new-proposal-would-allow-joint-practices-fall-camp-fbs
Sounds like it's definitely a topic of interest: https://www.wboy.com/goldandbluenation/could-joint-practices-be-part-of-the-future-of-college-football/#:~:text=Of those 25 teams, 10,rage at the next level.
Can't wait until our 2nd team is better than ku, ksu and isu starters. Order restored and mute pointWouldn't k-state, kansas or iowa state be better matches for a joint practice?