It’s not ‘blaming it on the “vaccine”’, it’s the automatic and reflexive dismissal by the media/political establishment of just the QUESTION as ‘conspiracy’. I mean, it’s changed the immunity of the ‘vaccinated’, at the genetic level. There have been obvious and overt side effects, and the medical community who benefit from doing so (and 98% of ‘media’) simply dismiss the idea. It’s against science.
Don’t you dare question the science
nypost.com
Interesting. Sunscreen prevents sunburns but also has chemicals that can’t be good for you. Good may outweigh the bad for some but not alljust in:
sunscreen has zero effect on skin cancer reduction (obviously, duh)
it just makes you unhealthy and kills the coral reefs (also obviously, duh)
quit using it, get full spectrum exposure (no sunglasses), walk barefoot and enjoy your life
The large majority of sunscreens have toxic chemicals in them anyway. It's like basting a turkey with toxic butter.just in:
sunscreen has zero effect on skin cancer reduction (obviously, duh)
it just makes you unhealthy and kills the coral reefs (also obviously, duh)
quit using it, get full spectrum exposure (no sunglasses), walk barefoot and enjoy your life
I think it’s one of those does the good outweigh the bad? If I was Bronny James I would not wear sunscreen, but my white English/Irish ass it might be a good idea
diet (seed oils) and wearing shades impacts your propensity to burn significantly more than your genetic heritage
Well fvck. Probably why my golf game starts falling apart around hole 14. Gonna skip sunscreen next round
I completely reject this. Pharmaceutical companies have nothing but public health at the center of all their products and would never dream of marketing anything that would be detrimental to anyone.
