"The player where you look at his offer list and say "Wow, this kid is a player. We got a good one here."
Maybe its just me, but I feel like that now. I don't know, I value offer lists, but I don't overvalue them. Offers aren't given out under the same conditions, some coaches blanket, some coaches are choosy. It may not even be philosophy most years, it could be scholarship logistics and needs. And the politics of being the first to offer, lots of schools don't want to be that school.
UT offered Stoll. Stoll is a 3 star. Does that "count" in a fight for good talent? On our side of the fence, we're happy that we went up against a high profile school in UT and won. Despite geographic and other disadvantages. On their side of the fence, they are unhappy for the same reasons, they lost to a school that crapped its pants on national tv multiple times with no built in advantages.
You would argue that we both should be upset, because Stoll is a three star not worth fighting over for either school. Seemingly. And one could easily compare that situation to Snyder and Harbaugh last year.
If elite schools and coaches like UT/Strong, and UM/Harbaugh and NU/Riley are supposed to be fighting over 5.8 4 stars with 3 other SEC schools, then why are we fighting over Stoll and Snyder? Even if one says that NU doesn't really have a shot at higher rated TE's, if UT and UM don't, then no one does.
Maybe its just me, but I feel like that now. I don't know, I value offer lists, but I don't overvalue them. Offers aren't given out under the same conditions, some coaches blanket, some coaches are choosy. It may not even be philosophy most years, it could be scholarship logistics and needs. And the politics of being the first to offer, lots of schools don't want to be that school.
UT offered Stoll. Stoll is a 3 star. Does that "count" in a fight for good talent? On our side of the fence, we're happy that we went up against a high profile school in UT and won. Despite geographic and other disadvantages. On their side of the fence, they are unhappy for the same reasons, they lost to a school that crapped its pants on national tv multiple times with no built in advantages.
You would argue that we both should be upset, because Stoll is a three star not worth fighting over for either school. Seemingly. And one could easily compare that situation to Snyder and Harbaugh last year.
If elite schools and coaches like UT/Strong, and UM/Harbaugh and NU/Riley are supposed to be fighting over 5.8 4 stars with 3 other SEC schools, then why are we fighting over Stoll and Snyder? Even if one says that NU doesn't really have a shot at higher rated TE's, if UT and UM don't, then no one does.