Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Love it. Play only OOC games and then give us Iowa in the rose bowl when we are both 13-0. J/k, Iowa never goes undefeated.This conference has not been afraid to lead in the past.
I predict a mercenary, 14 game slate. No conference games. All OOC.
Objective: Get as many 9-10 win teams as possible to scoop up as much bowl revenue as possible. Might be lots of higher tier bowl slots available if other conferences opt out.
Yep, sensing that vibe as well. If the BIG10 decindes not to have a season they should leave it open to the individual schools and programs to be able to create their own schedule and play other teams who are willing. The whole league shouldn't be punished because some schools can't get their shit together (cough cough, looking and you Rutgers) .
This conference has not been afraid to lead in the past.
If both teams are quarantined, the winner will be determined by the two coaches playing Mattel classic handheld football game.
We could claim conference title and national championship like some doLove it. Play only OOC games and then give us Iowa in the rose bowl when we are both 13-0. J/k, Iowa never goes undefeated.
God forbid everyone continues to feel fine while a positive result dictates the livelihood of thousands.No schedule for now. Everything on hold due to the outbreak of the virus at Rutgers. But there will have to be some decision in days on if/when Fall Camps will be allowed. I'm guessing they will delay Fall Camps but not make a final decision on the season.
I wouldn't be coughing too much. Everyone in the South was cough, cough at NY in March and April....and now look at what's happening.Yep, sensing that vibe as well. If the BIG10 decindes not to have a season they should leave it open to the individual schools and programs to be able to create their own schedule and play other teams who are willing. The whole league shouldn't be punished because some schools can't get their shit together (cough cough, looking and you Rutgers) .
fun with arbitrary end dates!I wouldn't be coughing too much. Everyone in the South was cough, cough at NY in March and April....and now look at what's happening.
Cases in the last 7 days:
NJ- 2,802 in a state with 8.8 million people.
NE- 2,067 in a state with 1.9 million people.
We have nothing to run off at the mouth about.
"fun with arbitrary end dates!"fun with arbitrary end dates!
NJ has suffered 16k deaths out of 185k cases. the worst in the nation by a country mile, and they will not be caught.
just an astonishingly stupid and meaningless post. you're in charge of children's education, for god's sake. certainly you're better than this?
do you not understand the word arbitrary? comparing the last 7 days, whether it's the CDC or anyone else, is absolutely meaningless."fun with arbitrary end dates!"
My 7 day count of new cases was from the CDC....based on what was on their website last night. If you don't like the data, take it up with them.
"NJ has suffered 16k deaths out of 185k cases. the worst in the nation by a country mile, and they will not be caught."
Yep.....during the duration of the pandemic. No argument from me. But Nebraska's numbers over the past 7 days are worse that New Jersey's relative to the state populations of each.....again....based on info from the CDC last night. If you're doubting it, I suggest you contact them, as I do not work for the CDC....or go take a hike....it's up to you.
do you not understand the word arbitrary? comparing the last 7 days, whether it's the CDC or anyone else, is absolutely meaningless.
your choosing to post completely arbitrary data while editorializing makes it you, not them, I have an issue with. you're not passing along facts, you're trying to prove a point. don't pass the buck, defend your stance if you believe it's meaningful (it's not).
NJ has had 185k cases. NE has had 27k. at this rate, NE could keep their case count steady while NJ could report literally zero and it would take 80+ weeks (that's more than 18 months) to catch them.
context is important. 7-day stretches? not so much.
perhaps if he'd posted about % positives, this post would have merit.your current risk of covid exposure is based on current % positive rate - not historic numbers
a persons risk in New York vs Orlando in much different today versus back in March
which is why last 7 days is the more relevant statistic to assess current risk of traveling to an area
"do you not understand the word arbitrary? comparing the last 7 days, whether it's the CDC or anyone else, is absolutely meaningless."do you not understand the word arbitrary? comparing the last 7 days, whether it's the CDC or anyone else, is absolutely meaningless.
your choosing to post completely arbitrary data while editorializing makes it you, not them, I have an issue with. you're not passing along facts, you're trying to prove a point. don't pass the buck, defend your stance if you believe it's meaningful (it's not).
NJ has had 185k cases. NE has had 27k. at this rate, NE could keep their case count steady while NJ could report literally zero and it would take 80+ weeks (that's more than 18 months) to catch them.
context is important. 7-day stretches? not so much. surely you're not this big an idiot.
OK.....% of new tests that are positive over the past 7 days, as of 2 am CT on 8/5......perhaps if he'd posted about % positives, this post would have merit.
he didn't, so it doesn't.
thanks for playing.
does covid go away in that time? based on your previous posts, I would think not. which means all cases are dangerous."do you not understand the word arbitrary? comparing the last 7 days, whether it's the CDC or anyone else, is absolutely meaningless."
And the number of cases NJ had compared to NE in March and April is far more arbitrary to current conditions....which is what you seem to be arguing.
"NJ has had 185k cases. NE has had 27k. at this rate, NE could keep their case count steady while NJ could report literally zero and it would take 80+ weeks (that's more than 18 months) to catch them."
Again....not arguing that.
"context is important. 7-day stretches? not so much. surely you're not this big an idiot"
So, you don't think that recent case trends matter more than what happened 3 months ago? If Nebraska was having 2,000 new cases a week over the past 2-3 weeks, and New Jersey was having 30 new cases per week over that stretch, you'd think that is meaningless? That wouldn't be a problem? To me, that tells me that one state is having a spike while another seems to have it under control for the time being. That would tell me that my chances of contracting the virus are greater in Lincoln than in Trenton at this point in time.
Apparently I am an idiot, because I'm not understanding your train of thought on this. Don't tell me about total cases over the past 5-6 months; like I said, I'm not arguing that fact.
alright! useful math! way to go, big guy!OK.....% of new tests that are positive over the past 7 days, as of 2 am CT on 8/5......
New Jersey- 1.5%
Nebraska- 9%
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/testing/tracker/map/percent-positive
So maybe we shouldn't be scoffing (or "cough, cough") at anyone, since we have the 2nd highest rate of positive new tests over the past 7 days of the B1G states (Iowa...figures)....and higher than CA, WA, OR, or CO of the PAC-12.alright! useful math! way to go, big guy!
as it pertains to the general population, sure.So maybe we shouldn't be scoffing (or "cough, cough") at anyone, since we have the 2nd highest rate of positive new tests over the past 7 days of the B1G states (Iowa...figures)....and higher than CA, WA, OR, or CO of the PAC-12.
I'd agree...and I hope that continues....but I'm not going to poke at other programs, when things can change pretty quickly, even from a simple, innocent misstep (not that you were poking, per se).as it pertains to the general population, sure.
as it pertains to the B1G football teams? seems like NU's taking it pretty seriously.
let's just hope vedral is okay.I'd agree...and I hope that continues....but I'm not going to poke at other programs, when things can change pretty quickly, even from a simple, innocent misstep (not that you were poking, per se).
Not talking about a state. Talking about a football program.I wouldn't be coughing too much. Everyone in the South was cough, cough at NY in March and April....and now look at what's happening.
Cases in the last 7 days:
NJ- 2,802 in a state with 8.8 million people.
NE- 2,067 in a state with 1.9 million people.
We have nothing to run off at the mouth about.
Vedral should be the starter, hands down. He’s that good. He just didn’t get a fair shake here in Nebraska.let's just hope vedral is okay.
rutgers will need their backup qb available after seeing our new and improved pass rush.
And considering the rate of new positives in each state it isn't out of the realm that Nebraska (the program) gets hit at some point.Not talking about a state. Talking about a football program.