Oh sorry, I meant like the best nebraska HS Qb that actually has interest from other schools. You really don't lose much by offering the kid.A Neb QB as not panned out in 24 years ( Not counting the idiot Frost). Makes good sense to keep offering. The Neraska way. Worked out well so far.
I don't think I explained myself all that well.Why should they offer the best QB in the state every single year? Does it not even matter if they don't think he's good enough to play at the BIG level?
For the life of me I have never understood the that logic. Don't even evaluate him vs other QBs in that class just automatically offer the best in state QB every year.
So what happens when you have 3 QBs on your roster who can't play dead in a western movie and guys you didn't recruit BECAUSE you offered those local guys are excelling elsewhere? All the while your fan base is bitching because you have horrible QB play and wants you fired.
Whatever happened to evaluating and comparing them to the rest of the country and getting the best guy you can? FWIW I'm not and wasn't a fan of the baby Raiola offer either. I don't think he's the best they could've gotten either. Yet the same way some in this thread have no problem pointing that out they would be perfectly ok with the exact same situation if the kid was from Nebraska. That's crazy to me that we are "ok" with possibly taken a worse player because he's from Nebraska. Not only that but we openly have people endorsing taken 'the best" QB from the state basically REGARDLESS of how good he is. For the life of me I can't make this make sense...
Holla
I don't mean offer the best QB each year if the best QB is still a dud. I mean offer the best QB in the state if he is clearly a P5 player.