You're only pulling a 3rd year QB from the Dakotas if he thinks he has a realistic chance to be your starter. I'm not talking about keeping a starter on our roster. I'm talking about keeping a guy on our roster who IF you have a disaster with injuries can come in and competently finish a season for you. We might be able to keep an area kid around for 3 years who might then decide to transfer after he doesn't beat out a younger higher ranked guy on the depth chart to be the backup. I just think relying on the transfer portal to fill out your QB depth chart is not a good plan for us. Maybe it works for OSU or Bama but i don't think that's going to work for us. By all means, shoot for the stars for the top 2-3 on the depth chart but if we're keeping 5 there's going to have to be some less highly recruited guys who could be effective by virtue of knowing the offense and receivers inside and out. I want an athletic game manager or two filling out our depth chart and our best bet for that are probably going to be area kids with few or zero P4 offers. Edit/Add: Who knows, maybe he turns in to a 4th or 5th year senior starter.
I get it we just have completely different views on the matter and that's ok. To me it's like recruiting guys to be "backups". I'll never be ok with that. Regardless of the position I want to recruit the best guys I can. When and if it doesn't work out then I go and recruit the next best guy I can from HS/portal/JC or anywhere else
To me it's like special teams guys. You don't recruit guys to just play special teams . You recruit guys hoping they can be starters in your program. Some will some won't. Some end up on specialty teams until they can get game minutes or transfer out . But you aren't recruiting a "lesser" player PURPOSELY.
I feel like you are basically saying we recruit a "lessor" player (local at that) because he/she is more likely to stay around in case of an emergency and we get down to our 3rd or 4th QB . To me it's almost like giving up a scholarship. With the 105 limit I jREALLY just don't see a reason to do this.
I wouldn't do it in any era tbh. But if you are talking a walk on I guess I understand. But purposefully recruiting a lessor guy because you think he's more apt to stay and not transfer? I won't ever be ok with that. To me it's too much like hiring a lessor coach so nobody will come and offer more money to take him away from you lol..
Again we while I understand your premise we will likely always be on opposing sides when it comes to that. I'll always take the best player I can get. Then let the chips fall where they may.
Holla