our best years were dual style not statues. lots of programs looking for runners too.
Doesn't matter. New coach should be able to get it done in year 3. No excuses!!!Well it does bring up a pertinent point for the guys that Riley canned tonight and Frost to be here in the morning.....He would have a problem running his offense for a while as in maybe a couple of years.
He gets 27 games. No more no less.Well it does bring up a pertinent point for the guys that Riley canned tonight and Frost to be here in the morning.....He would have a problem running his offense for a while as in maybe a couple of years.
our best years were dual style not statues. lots of programs looking for runners too.
The OP waited almost 13 years to come up with this first post...
He's obviously much smarter than the rest of us.No kidding!
I really am impressed with that..
Doesn't matter. New coach should be able to get it done in year 3. No excuses!!!
He gets one game...win and go on...lose and leave. Every week it is that way.He gets 27 games. No more no less.
Sounds about like the "Nebraska Way"He gets one game...win and go on...lose and leave. Every week it is that way.
Sounds about like the "Nebraska Way"
Passing qbs and spread offenses aren't mutually exclusive. In terms that dingle will understand... a pro style qb can be very successful in a spread offense
How many spread quarterbacks have had success in the NFL?
cam - great qb, for one season
dak - no argument here, yet
mariota - Struggling right now
goff seems ok in year 2 - impressive so far, but too small a sample size to say he's turned it around
wilson (at nc st, wisky used some spread stuff with him) - Wilson is pro style all the way
taylor - average at best
dalton - seriously?
smith - took forever for him to develop into a decent QB, poster boy for spread QBs who take longer to develop than guys that played in pro-style offenses in college.
How many spread quarterbacks have had success in the NFL?
Doesn't matter. New coach should be able to get it done in year 3. No excuses!!!
Does it matter?
If you want to recruit elite quarterbacks, it does. If you want to recruit high school safeties and try to turn them into option quarterbacks then no.
The team should, at the very least, show progress. Even in a transition year. It shouldn't regress in basically all facets of the game.Doesn't matter. New coach should be able to get it done in year 3. No excuses!!!
Sounds about like the "Nebraska Way"
It shouldn't but if going into year 3 and we're not getting the results we want, no excuses and he's got to go.NU gets a REAL coach it shouldn't be a problem to turn this around in 3 years.
The OP waited almost 13 years to come up with this first post...
Precisely why suddenly converting back to a triple option attack will set the program back 3 more years.
Consider the guys recruiting the position immediately after Suh and you will find your answer as to why we didn’t recruit the position better...The Cornhuskers sure won a lot of games with safeties playing quarterback. I don't care how many quarterbacks Nebraska puts into the NFL. That doesn't put trophies in the case. Nebraska is a college program. What matters is winning games with the red "N" on the helmet.
Putting guys in the pros matters only because it helps recruiting, but even then I'm not so sure about that. Every DT recruit in the country said Suh was his favorite player, and still Nebraska struggled to recruit them after Suh was gone. So the impact of that may be minimal.
not a member of this board. just like to pull your chain.
Do colleges recruit hs QBs to play in college or play or the NFL? Plenty of successful college players that never sniff the NFL.
Not sure about that, but definitely the best qb in college.Lamar Jackson will never play QB in the NFL.
Wish we had him now.