Somewhere else I am in a discussion with SEC folks about the thread title. (They brought it up BTW) They brought up, of course, that our offense would not work because players now are bigger, faster, stronger; blah blah blah. And if was so great why does no one run it anymore? Here is part of my answer. I did not even get into the physicality factor of the game then vs. now, because it is not easy to justify. Does anyone have similar or contrary thoughts? Just for fun discussion. There is of course no end point to these things.
"Because the NFL doesn't run it. It is more and more a passing league. And its influence / salaries has grown larger. So it filters down to lower levels of college, h.s., and so on. Even back then, it was rare for anyone to run it. Players especially now do not grow up wanting to play or even see an option / Power I based game, and young coaches do not learn it or teach it. There is no real upward path to take with it.
Also, the common argument about players evolving does not really hold true. Players are not much different than 30 years ago. And even if they were, wouldn't that benefit the offense too? In fact, in this offense, which is based on assignments and eye discipline, I would argue it helps the offense more. If they were bigger and faster the D would get out of position faster and further before they corrected themselves. On the other hand the offense knows where it is going and would do execute it even better."
And they bring up Ladd McConkey. LMAO
"Because the NFL doesn't run it. It is more and more a passing league. And its influence / salaries has grown larger. So it filters down to lower levels of college, h.s., and so on. Even back then, it was rare for anyone to run it. Players especially now do not grow up wanting to play or even see an option / Power I based game, and young coaches do not learn it or teach it. There is no real upward path to take with it.
Also, the common argument about players evolving does not really hold true. Players are not much different than 30 years ago. And even if they were, wouldn't that benefit the offense too? In fact, in this offense, which is based on assignments and eye discipline, I would argue it helps the offense more. If they were bigger and faster the D would get out of position faster and further before they corrected themselves. On the other hand the offense knows where it is going and would do execute it even better."
And they bring up Ladd McConkey. LMAO