With the nebraska luck, we'd have gotten a block in the back or shanked the extra point, ifs and buts.It did look wide open on his right...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With the nebraska luck, we'd have gotten a block in the back or shanked the extra point, ifs and buts.It did look wide open on his right...
To be fair, one bounced off a facemask, the last when his protection broke down and the defender hit his arm. But the others, most certainly.Lee has to be better - 4 INTs in not acceptable
Watched the entire game, penalty numbers seem pretty accurate, there were at least two times when an Oregon blatantly false started that no flag was thrown, so they could have had a few more. Not to mention them totally bungling Tyjon Lindsey's (should have been) first down catch in the first half with the score 28-14 AND then creating a phantom false start to negate the 4th down play. Since you seem to think there was some sort of unfair discrepancy in the penalty calling, why don't you say where it was?Did you watch the game? Seriously? Start with looking at penalty numbers.
The first one should have been caught, plain and simple, not on Lee at all. Second one, either Lee threw it to the wrong spot or Stanley Morgan turned the wrong direction, not sure whose fault there. Third one wasn't as bad as some made it out to be. They showed the replay from behind Tanner Lee, and you can see from that view, while the guy he threw it to was covered, he appeared to have a step that the ball could be fit into. The Oregon defender simply made an excellent cut across the receiver and intercepted the ball. Not a great throw to make, no; but it's not like he threw it to someone who was draped in coverage with no chance to catch it. Final one, hit as he threw, not his fault.To be fair, one bounced off a facemask, the last when his protection broke down and the defender hit his arm. But the others, most certainly.