https://www.espn.com/college-sports...etic-directors-support-one-transfer-exemption.
Not a bad idea at face value but teams could rise and fall so quickly.
Not a bad idea at face value but teams could rise and fall so quickly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes I definitely can see that happeningHey JD Speilman, Dabo here. We need you down here in Clemson, now have us some real generous car dealers down here that have put together an outstanding package for you to look at.
We are talking commercials, radio spots, autograph sessions. We believe you'll like the dollars they are prepared to give you for your NIL.
Come on down and join a championship team, you're the only piece we're missing this fall due to Jimmy Joe hurting his knee and all.
I think the idea of transferring and being immediately eligible is a bad one. But at the present, immediate eligibility has been awarded to some high profile guys (Justin Fields got immediately eligible at Ohio State for hearing a racial slur in Georgia) while nearly everyone else has had to sit out. So maybe it would be more fair.https://www.espn.com/college-sports...etic-directors-support-one-transfer-exemption.
Not a bad idea at face value but teams could rise and fall so quickly.
Hey JD Speilman, Dabo here. We need you down here in Clemson, now have us some real generous car dealers down here that have put together an outstanding package for you to look at.
We are talking commercials, radio spots, autograph sessions. We believe you'll like the dollars they are prepared to give you for your NIL.
Come on down and join a championship team, you're the only piece we're missing this fall due to Jimmy Joe hurting his knee and all.
I agree, and if there is a limit per class/per year, how does one go about deciding if there is a surplus wanting to leave?So if this a new rule how many players can transfer out in one year if they are disgruntled with their playing time?
Had anyone thought about what kind of problem this would cause if you have a over abundance of players leaving.
The simple solution to me would be to allow each team a certain number of transfers who are eligible immediately, and the rest have to sit out a year. So say every team gets 2 transfers who can play immediately, the rest have to sit out a year. That would make it fair for everyone, without making it a complete free-agent free-for-all.
I think there should only be a couple reasons one should be allowed to transfer and not sit out. #1 If the HC is fired. Lets face it these kids commit to the coaches, not to the university or the fans. Many have had a relationship with the coaches since soph, juniors in highschool. If that is yanked away, they should have the right to find somewhere they are comfortable.https://www.espn.com/college-sports...etic-directors-support-one-transfer-exemption.
Not a bad idea at face value but teams could rise and fall so quickly.
I am all for people getting opportunities. I think it’s great for kids to be able to play immediately and not lose a year of eligibility. Also it keeps consistency without loopholes, exceptions/waivers. But seriously if a kid doesn’t feel valued go somewhere else. And like anything Nebraska will benefit from some and will hurt on othersI am probably the odd one here. I would keep the one year sit out rule and actually make it stronger, not weaker. Close the loop on all the exceptions.
If people think kids changing their minds before signing day is an issue, just wait for the mess if this gets done.
I am all for people getting opportunities. I think it’s great for kids to be able to play immediately and not lose a year of eligibility. Also it keeps consistency without loopholes, exceptions/waivers. But seriously if a kid doesn’t feel valued go somewhere else. And like anything Nebraska will benefit from some and will hurt on others
*privilegesHow do people who oppose the rule rationalize that 20 other college sports (Volleyball, Track/Field, Swimming, Golf, Tennis, LaCrosse, etc) allow for immediate transfer eligibility.
Why shouldn't Football and Basketball players (sports with a higher % of minorities), be afforded the same rights?
How do people who oppose the rule rationalize that 20 other college sports (Volleyball, Track/Field, Swimming, Golf, Tennis, LaCrosse, etc) allow for immediate transfer eligibility.
Why shouldn't Football and Basketball players (sports with a higher % of minorities), be afforded the same rights?
For F sake please tell me you are some how not turning this into a race thing. Might be because those 2 sports account for 90% of public interest and university revenue stream from sports. Having players jumping ship non stop would cause bigger issues and and problems with stability compared to other sports. Zero to do with race. lolHow do people who oppose the rule rationalize that 20 other college sports (Volleyball, Track/Field, Swimming, Golf, Tennis, LaCrosse, etc) allow for immediate transfer eligibility.
Why shouldn't Football and Basketball players (sports with a higher % of minorities), be afforded the same rights?
For F sake please tell me you are some how not turning this into a race thing. Might be because those 2 sports account for 90% of public interest and university revenue stream from sports. Having players jumping ship non stop would cause bigger issues and and problems with stability compared to other sports. Zero to do with race. lol
I agree that this is not a proposal motivated by race, but dude what are the bigger problems? The schools will benefit just as much as players. If a player isn’t happy or is a detriment to team coaches can weed them out and even assist them to transfer to another school. If it hurts anyone it’s the small schools that could lose star players to powerhouses. Idk about u but I’m ok with that.For F sake please tell me you are some how not turning this into a race thing. Might be because those 2 sports account for 90% of public interest and university revenue stream from sports. Having players jumping ship non stop would cause bigger issues and and problems with stability compared to other sports. Zero to do with race. lol
Who said anything about jumping ship non-stop? The rule is to allow each person one time.For F sake please tell me you are some how not turning this into a race thing. Might be because those 2 sports account for 90% of public interest and university revenue stream from sports. Having players jumping ship non stop would cause bigger issues and and problems with stability compared to other sports. Zero to do with race. lol
Just depends LSU wouldn’t release the girl that transferred to Nebraska she had to sit out a yearI didn’t realize you can transfer in Volleyball without sitting but I also can tell you all those other college sports(except Volleyball) are non revenue sports..
The game is on a real slippery slope. I'm not opposed to players getting a cut of the money they generate, but there is not going to be any equality in it.
Cheaters are going to cheat and the NCAA is a nut less sack with no way to put sanctions on anyone.
I truly believe this will destroy college athletics.
How would you work that out? A first come bases? Don’t see how that would work.
If you have an over abundance of players leaving, then you have bigger problemsSo if this a new rule how many players can transfer out in one year if they are disgruntled with their playing time?
Had anyone thought about what kind of problem this would cause if you have a over abundance of players leaving.
and redshirt at the first school to bootSo, what would stop Alabama from telling a kid, we dont have a scholarship for you this year, so if you want to play, go play at school x, but we have a "possible opening next year, hint hint wink wink".
Kid goes to a school for a year, knowing he is only there for a year before he moves on to his top choice who was out of room.
Of course, there is a gamble to that, but hey