1 Time Transfer Rule

Discussion in 'Husker Board' started by RedMyMind, Jan 31, 2020.

  1. John_J_Rambo

    John_J_Rambo Redshirt Freshman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2020
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    808
    I believe that's the point.

    lots of folks imagining some far out merry-go-round (see above) when in reality a very small percentage of players, especially impact players, end up transferring. sitting out 1 year likely isn't keeping would-be transfers from leaving, just like no limitation wouldn't all of a sudden spur on a sort of musical chairs between kids and programs.
     
    jeans15 likes this.
  2. Husker Red 182

    Husker Red 182 Walk On
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2019
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    90
    dude relax it just changes how teams acquire talent. In a lot of cases I bet the parting is mutual anyways and the kid that leaves is prob not going to fit in with program anyway. And secondly there are only so many starting spots regardless of where a kid goes. Finally if a kid doesn’t get it right the first time pressure is on to do it the second. I’m all for if a coach can move around at Will why cant a player
     
    John_J_Rambo likes this.
  3. Harry Caray

    Harry Caray Head Coach
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    12,615
    Likes Received:
    8,128
    Coaches have to pay a buyout if they leave, players have to sit out a year. There are consequences for both. Should scholarships come with a buyout clause instead?

    I think this new rule won't be a good thing for programs like Nebraska that get most of their players from out-of-state. A lot of freshmen who feel a little homesick and aren't playing much might not have as much patience to stick it out here.
     
    husker2612 likes this.
  4. Husker Red 182

    Husker Red 182 Walk On
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2019
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    90
    The programs that it hurts are the smaller schools who could lose higher level players to larger programs. Nebraska for most part will lose kids who were not going to contribute anyway
     
  5. jeans15

    jeans15 Head Coach
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2011
    Messages:
    12,615
    Likes Received:
    3,355
    Gotcha
     
  6. NikkiSixx

    NikkiSixx All-American
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2013
    Messages:
    4,980
    Likes Received:
    3,030
    the B1G is stupid.. it is like socialism for college football, but of course they don't ever win anything anymore either. Just a matter of time until those TV rights aren't so meaningful to bidders.
     
  7. John_J_Rambo

    John_J_Rambo Redshirt Freshman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2020
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    808
    controversial take at a time when the people running the biggest networks in the world are foaming at the mouth for more live sports rights.

    a quote from the CEO of Disney: "Nobody's ever overpaid for live sports."

    there will never, ever be a time when those TV rights are any less meaningful to bidders. sorry.
     
  8. NikkiSixx

    NikkiSixx All-American
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2013
    Messages:
    4,980
    Likes Received:
    3,030
    never is a long time..

    Stephen Burke a VP at Comcast, says that content creators (Youtube) are 'eating their lunch'. 'Their' meaning traditional cable networks, which may not survive in their current form.

    What happens when Live sports goes to the pay per view, ala cart model? No networks, just pay to watch the game. How much money will be lost in that disruption and removal of the middle man? how much belt tightening has ESPN had to do for years now?

    Again, the model is going to change, and never is a very very long time.
     
  9. John_J_Rambo

    John_J_Rambo Redshirt Freshman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2020
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    808
    live sports will go to game-by-game pay per view? I don't think so.

    ESPN may be tightening their belts in terms of no more magazine, etc., but they've never had more resources pointed directly at live sports. SEC network, monday night football and so on.

    the middle man won't disrupt live sports because they can't. the entire sport of football will die before networks desire airing it less.
     
  10. NikkiSixx

    NikkiSixx All-American
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2013
    Messages:
    4,980
    Likes Received:
    3,030
    the disruption is the removal of the middle man
     
  11. John_J_Rambo

    John_J_Rambo Redshirt Freshman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2020
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    808
    so, without a middle man we're all going to be watching live sports from someone's iphone stream who's at the game?

    sounds great
     
  12. mtvrdy

    mtvrdy Senior
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,827
    Likes Received:
    1,283
    Rich would get richer for sure. The best players would leave for a chance at a Clemson, Alabama, LSU, Ohio State etc. if they weren't eligible for the pro's.
     
  13. John_J_Rambo

    John_J_Rambo Redshirt Freshman
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2020
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    808
    How’s that different from what happens today?

    Pretty rare a kid with an offer from any of those 4 schools goes elsewhere. Same for a transfer.

    This is the laziest argument going.
     
  14. jlb321

    jlb321 Recruiting Coordinator
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2014
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    7,267
    The NCAA just can’t get out of its own way

     
    John_J_Rambo likes this.

Share This Page