ADVERTISEMENT

We played only 5 OL in 100plus heat index? .......discuss

regionsdoc

Senior
Feb 4, 2004
2,691
2,180
113
might have something to do with no push at the end of the game. foster,sterup....seriously, not good enough to play 1 or 2 series?
 
I agree with this. I though at times Utter was getting destroyed. Why not let Foster in for a series or 2. We rotated on defensive line all game long why not on O line.
 
Alex Lewis is hugely disappointing. For a guy who talks about "never touching our QB" , he was beaten like a rented mule many times on the day. And still gets bonehead, drive-killing penalties. Talks like Tarzan, often plays like Jane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: steelclaw
If they really only played five, then that is really dumb. When you have the advantage of playing with a bigger roster, you use it. Sub out both lines and let fresher guys max their effort in the exhausting heat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: huskerj12
might have something to do with no push at the end of the game. foster,sterup....seriously, not good enough to play 1 or 2 series?
Was this really true? I wasn't watching that closely but this cannot be true. There had to be some kind of rotation even if it was from series to series.
 
Gerald Foster and David Knevel are listed on the participation report.
 
I recall a statement from the staff that the "best 5" will play. Sometimes the best 5 changes as the game progresses, especially in the heat.
 
There was one play where a certain player was pushed straight back and fell on his behind...I couldn't believe it when it happened but after that, I had a feeling we may lose. I can't believe how their pass rush dominated our offensive line at least until their star defensive tackle got hurt.
 
Foster should be rotating in at guard L & R

Sterup should be getting some time

Thurston should be getting some time

IMO there should be at least an 8 man rotation on the OL minimum every game, but again maybe just me
 
Foster should be rotating in at guard L & R

Sterup should be getting some time

Thurston should be getting some time

IMO there should be at least an 8 man rotation on the OL minimum every game, but again maybe just me
Gerald Foster and David Knevel are listed on the participation report.


Foster was on punt team, never saw Knevel on the field, maybe I missed him. After 20 spring ball practices and 4 weeks of fall camp we only have 5 OL capable of playing, especially when the first unit was getting boned most of the game. Plus the fact that we ran maybe a package of 6-8 different rushing plays. The second unit doesn't know how to block those plays? That's hard to accept. How do expect to recruit top notch talent if they never see the field.
 
Did the OL seem like they were getting pusehd around OR just that they were more stuck in a stalemate? Getting pushed around would worry me about the SC program for the last 8 months. I guess I did not notice them getting pushed around that much.
 
I will say that our longest drive was less than five minutes...most were 2-3 minutes.We need better ball control but it wasn't like they were out there for 8 minute drives.

Still...come on...that may work at OSU because of talent differential and lack of heat. But not in Lincoln when it is 100 + on the field.
 
A young line needs to gel together as a unit. Thats long term thinking that the last staff didnt do. Probably one of the reason Bo's teams caved in November.
 
There was info in an a press release a couple weeks(?) back that the OLine would "not be rotating much". Now we know what "not be rotating much" actually means. Quote from article here on rivals:

"***Guard Dylan Utter said it really helped the offensive line not rotating much at all against BYU. In fact, he said the starting five played every snap of the game."
 
I always thought that you're always better off rotating players unless #1 there's a huge drop off to the backups or #2 the system is too complicated to teach more than one group. If a player is barely better than a backup, the starter should not be playing 100% of the plays.
 
There was info in an a press release a couple weeks(?) back that the OLine would "not be rotating much". Now we know what "not be rotating much" actually means. Quote from article here on rivals:

"***Guard Dylan Utter said it really helped the offensive line not rotating much at all against BYU. In fact, he said the starting five played every snap of the game."
Utter knows that this will ultimately make them a more cohesive unit. Its a long season.
 
So Utter is under the impression that playing five was helpful? Does he seriously think that the online performance was good? How bad does he think it would have been if we rotated? Good golly...he makes no sense.
 
Last edited:
Sure it is with the youth we have. These guys need to gel together more than anything. I'll go with Cavanagh here.

On a day like Saturday you have to have a little confidence in 2 or 3 linemen besides the starters is all's I'm saying even uncle Milty substituted more than that.
 
So Utter is under the kids impression that playing five was helpful? Does he seriously think that the online performance was good? How bad does he think it would have been if we rotated? Good golly...he makes no sense.
Sure he does. He knows there will be growing pains as the unit gels. I'm sure he and Cavanaugh get it more than an Oklahoma preacher does.
 
On a day like Saturday you have to have a little confidence in 2 or 3 linemen besides the starters is all's I'm saying even uncle Milty substituted more than that.
Uncle Milty never had play so much inexperience either. Cav is basically having to start from scratch.
 
I agree with this. I though at times Utter was getting destroyed. Why not let Foster in for a series or 2. We rotated on defensive line all game long why not on O line.
Wasnt it Foster protecting the punter when the punter got hurt?
 
It's sad we dont have 8-10 linemen who can play. Should have that every year
 
Sure it is with the youth we have. These guys need to gel together more than anything. I'll go with Cavanagh here.

Crazy, at the O-Line position you're bound to have guys get rolled up on throughout the year and go out injured. The chances of these 5 all being healthy at the end of the season are slim.
 
Crazy, at the O-Line position you're bound to have guys get rolled up on throughout the year and go out injured. The chances of these 5 all being healthy at the end of the season are slim.
Maybe so but i"m going to defer to Cavanaugh on this.
 
I couldn't believe Foster didn't play. Both guards really struggled.
 
I couldn't believe Foster didn't play. Both guards really struggled.
Utter was bad. Maybe, the one play where he got knocked completely on his ass in the backfield is clouding my view, but it's bad when your not big or athletic. Bleh
 
Knevel was on the field as a 6th OL (TE) on one of the late short yardage plays.

Was he the #80 I saw then?

I noticed 80, had no clue who it was, and spaced off looking it up until now. Went to the roster and see that we don't have an 80 listed.
 
Was he the #80 I saw then?

I noticed 80, had no clue who it was, and spaced off looking it up until now. Went to the roster and see that we don't have an 80 listed.
yes that was knevel he was on the field goal team and extra end on a third on one,if lewis was injured he would have put 77 on and gone in
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuskerTimOmaha
I was sitting behind the bench. Farmer is one large guy. His arms are like tree trunks. What's the story on this guy??
 
Sure he does. He knows there will be growing pains as the unit gels. I'm sure he and Cavanaugh get it more than an Oklahoma preacher does.
Hilarious! Utter wasn't talking about the rest of the season. He said it helped them on Saturday. "Utter said it really helped the offensive line not rotating much at all against BYU." If Utter and Cav think something...anything...really helped them on Saturday then they have low expectations...because the oline stunk. The only thing that may have helped them marginally was that BYU's best defensive player went out.

You guys who are trying to defend how much better our oline played on Saturday because they played five guys are stinking hilarious.
 
Last edited:
Agreed. Pretty sure the game film verifies this. I guess an optimist credits BYU's DLine b/c they made our OLine look awful...

GBR
 
Crazy, at the O-Line position you're bound to have guys get rolled up on throughout the year and go out injured. The chances of these 5 all being healthy at the end of the season are slim.

This. Plus people eventually graduate, so unless you always want to be starting over, you get the other guys some snaps. I can see focusing on a certain line-up if you are in catch-up mode and trying to get them up to speed as fast as possible, but I do not believe that sets you up well for late in the season or for future seasons.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT