ADVERTISEMENT

We are #1 !!!

Multiple people have pointed out that the other teams probably aren't running as much because the passing is so easy against us. And I think we might see that USM and USA aren't really strong rushing teams going forward.

My previous post shows them wrong, 2014 McNeese State flooded the numbers, I couldn't make it more obvious for everyone to see.

Florida Atlantic and FCS opponent McNeese State steps in and says hello...
 
He may be-and I am saying this in all seriousness-trying to build a D that won't get it's butt kicked by Wisconsin and Minnesota. Because that would be embarrassing to SE.

Exactly. Eichorst blew up the program because he and many in this fan base couldn't stomach a couple of blowouts to Wisconsin. I expect Wes Lunt is going to have a field day against this secondary on Saturday. Because RBs with 400-yard rushing games against the Blackshirts provide so much more embarrassment than than QBs who put up 400 yard passing games against a secondary.
 
Exactly. Eichorst blew up the program because he and many in this fan base couldn't stomach a couple of blowouts to Wisconsin. I expect Wes Lunt is going to have a field day against this secondary on Saturday. Because RBs with 400-yard rushing games against the Blackshirts provide so much more embarrassment than than QBs who put up 400 yard passing games against a secondary.

You don't win games when anyone runs for 400. You can still win games if they are forced to throw for 400 and can't run the ball.
 
Eichorst blew up the program because he and many in this fan base couldn't stomach a couple of blowouts to Wisconsin.

3 is more than "a couple"....

RollingLaugh

Io_a 38 Nebraska 17
Michigan State 41 Nebraska 28
Minnesota 34 Nebraska 23
UCLA 41 Nebraska 21
Georgia 45 Nebraska 31
Ohio State 63 Nebraska 38
South Carolina 30 Nebraska 13
Michigan 45 Nebraska 17

Because RBs with 400-yard rushing games against the Blackshirts provide so much more embarrassment than than QBs who put up 400 yard passing games against a secondary.

NCAA single game rushing record, facts be damned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tulsa Tom
Exactly. Eichorst blew up the program because he and many in this fan base couldn't stomach a couple of blowouts to Wisconsin. I expect Wes Lunt is going to have a field day against this secondary on Saturday. Because RBs with 400-yard rushing games against the Blackshirts provide so much more embarrassment than than QBs who put up 400 yard passing games against a secondary.

Bo Blew up the program when he got destroyed on national television by a Wisconsin team that was barely above 500.

Then followed it up by giving up an NCAA rushing record, through 3 quarters?.

I could go on and on with the incredible story that is Bo, but you already know the details and history of the Defensive Guru that is Bo Peeelini.
 
Back to penalties.

“I’m sure that they took off at least 10 points for penalties and probably 150 yards,” he said. “I’m frustrated that we are not a little bit better to eliminate some of those penalties. I’m going to take a more aggressive approach to teaching,.”

Good call coach! (Too bad it's from Lester...)
 
Bo Blew up the program when he got destroyed on national television by a Wisconsin team that was barely above 500.

Then followed it up by giving up an NCAA rushing record, through 3 quarters?.

I could go on and on with the incredible story that is Bo, but you already know the details and history of the Defensive Guru that is Bo Peeelini.
You see those kind of passing numbers every week, all over the country (and in the NFL). How many times do you see 408 on the ground in 3 quarters to one frickin guy? He would have had 1000 if the endzone wouldn't have stopped him. Your logic, like yourself is quite flawed. Your agenda is showing.
 
3 is more than "a couple"....

RollingLaugh

Io_a 38 Nebraska 17
Michigan State 41 Nebraska 28
Minnesota 34 Nebraska 23
UCLA 41 Nebraska 21
Georgia 45 Nebraska 31
Ohio State 63 Nebraska 38
South Carolina 30 Nebraska 13
Michigan 45 Nebraska 17



NCAA single game rushing record, facts be damned.

Let's also not forget:

1. The difficult wins against average opponents
2. No fewer than four losses per season except for the season he was fired.
3. Zero championships of significance
4. Zero BCS/New Year's Six tier bowl games.
5. Numerous PR gaffes and attrition with the fans and media

...and notable for this season:

6. Half-baked recruiting that yielded most of our current two-deep on defense.

Such a grand man with grand accomplishments. Yet, he's now at Youngstown State.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuskerTimOmaha
Back to penalties.

“I’m sure that they took off at least 10 points for penalties and probably 150 yards,” he said. “I’m frustrated that we are not a little bit better to eliminate some of those penalties. I’m going to take a more aggressive approach to teaching,.”

Good call coach! (Too bad it's from Lester...)

Are you suggesting Riley and his staff aren't concerned about this? A quick google search reveals comments directly from Riley that documents concern.

"The Huskers racked up 12 penalties for 98 yards. And is the coach concerned?

"Yeah, absolutely, absolutely," Riley answered a reporter in mid-question. "We got better last week and then procedurally tonight, it was not good. We had a hard time with some formations. No telling what that in the end cost us."

http://journalstar.com/sports/huske...cle_c925b3f9-59f4-53d4-8888-7b754eaf93d5.html

It's been terrible but it's clear the staff has it on the radar. We will have to see if it gets better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timnsun
The think I like Lester is he has shared the answer. He personally needs to get more aggressive with his approach to teaching. I am sure that Riley feels he has some answers...I just would like to know what those things are. Obviously, Riley isn't ignoring it. I would just like to know what he is doing to see it get corrected.
 
The think I like Lester is he has shared the answer. He personally needs to get more aggressive with his approach to teaching. I am sure that Riley feels he has some answers...I just would like to know what those things are. Obviously, Riley isn't ignoring it. I would just like to know what he is doing to see it get corrected.
This made me chuckle a little... It's not enough to hear that he is aware and will do something about it. You want to know what he is going to do. What purpose does that serve? I know Riley is more transparent than our previous staff, but why does he need to tell us precisely how he will fix it? If Riley said, "I'm going to have to take a more aggressive approach to teaching" you would be better? What kind of answer is that? If Riley is aware and addressing it, I am sure teaching will come into play.

Trust the coaches. None of us need to know what Riley will do. We just need to know that he will do something.
 
He should say something like this: "I wish there was a drill or a solution to decreasing penalties, but sadly there is not". Then everyone will give him a pass.
 
The think I like Lester is he has shared the answer. He personally needs to get more aggressive with his approach to teaching. I am sure that Riley feels he has some answers...I just would like to know what those things are. Obviously, Riley isn't ignoring it. I would just like to know what he is doing to see it get corrected.

Alright. I personally think this is a double-edged sword. You talk about player focus and execution and you get mocked for coach speak. I can handle a hold or a PI once in a while but I'd like to see the false start, procedural, and alignment/shift stuff go away. That's for sure.
 
We are also #1 in passing yards allowed. Granted, that stat has more schedule influence than penalties, but that is still awful.
should never give up 379 yards passing over a 4 game stretch no matter who you play
 
I really don't think Banker is as big of a problem as the whiners on here make him out to be. At some point you have to objectively look at what he has to work with and realize that our talent isn't where it needs to be. NOBODY IMO would be able to deal with the injuries and lack of depth we have at backer and DE and make no mistake its having a huge impact on our secondary. We need to quit the blame game. We're way short on Jimmies and Joes.
Oregon state the last 2 years under banker gave up 32 ppg
 
Oregon state the last 2 years under banker gave up 32 ppg

2015 Nebraska, under Banker, is giving up 26.5 PPG, which is .1 PPG higher than Peelini.

2014 Nebraska gave up 26.4 PPG. 2013 Nebraska gave up 24.8 PPG.

Surprised @suhnami hasn't jumped in here since you're living in the past. Oh well, his agenda was already known...
 
2015 Nebraska, under Banker, is giving up 26.5 PPG, which is .1 PPG higher than Peelini.

2014 Nebraska gave up 26.4 PPG. 2013 Nebraska gave up 24.8 PPG.

Surprised @suhnami hasn't jumped in here since you're living in the past. Oh well, his agenda was already known...
Take out the fcs school Nebraska giving up 32ppg
 
Manipulating stats, not the first time I've seen it nor will it be the last time.
lol you needed to include a bad fcs team to make the stats seam better than they really are. yes me talking out a fcs school really manipulated the stats
 
2015 Nebraska, under Banker, is giving up 26.5 PPG, which is .1 PPG higher than Peelini.

2014 Nebraska gave up 26.4 PPG. 2013 Nebraska gave up 24.8 PPG.

Surprised @suhnami hasn't jumped in here since you're living in the past. Oh well, his agenda was already known...

This is interesting. We are seeing more and more people argue that in todays college football game one should only really be worried about turnovers created and PPG. The rest is minor given that spread concepts have changed college football forever. Giving up 400 yards a game is basically standard at this point.
 
lol you needed to include a bad fcs team to make the stats seam better than they really are. yes me talking out a fcs school really manipulated the stats

I didn't include any FCS team, you may want to follow football a little closer before popping off.
 
Giving up 400 yards a game is basically standard at this point.

Interesting you say this, 15 seasons should be a large enough sample size.

Number of teams that give up less than 400 total yards a game
2014 - 69 defenses (Nebraska 383.7)
2013 - 62 defenses (Nebraska 370.7)
2012 - 65 defenses (Nebraska 360.6)
2011 - 75 defenses (Nebraska 350.7)
2010 - 82 defenses (Nebraska 306.8)
2009 - 87 defenses (Nebraska 271.3)
2008 - 91 defenses (Nebraska 349.8)
2007 - 68 defenses (Nebraska 476.8)
2006 - 108 defenses (Nebraska 331.8)
2005 - 76 defenses (Nebraska 332.1)
2004 - 79 defenses (Nebraska 371.6)
2003 - 77 defenses (Nebraska 297.1)
2002 - 80 defenses (Nebraska 361.9)
2001 - 78 defenses (Nebraska 287.1)
2000 - 79 defenses (Nebraska 321.8)

Archie, I'm also going to add this to the other thread....
 
And you expect what after 4 games switching from a match up zone????????

Embarrassed on occasion? We are 2-2 and lost on a last play of the game hail mary, and in OT. I'm far from as f-ing embarrassed as I was after losing to Minny twice, getting drilled 3 of 4 vs Wisky, needing AA to bail out out against McNeese State, barely holding on against Wyoming (who went 5-7), blowing a lead and getting bitch slapped by UCLA at home, needing a hail mary to beat NW at home, losing another one to NW at home when they ran like 18 straight times, beating South Dakota State 17-3 thanks to clipping calls, etc, etc.

Some of you are looking for reasons to be embarrassed, because you decided from day one Banker sucked, and now that he is here with a depleted roster BEFORE the injuries, you want to prove yourself right.
He has sucked from day one, no one can argue that point.
 
3 is more than "a couple"....

RollingLaugh

Io_a 38 Nebraska 17
Michigan State 41 Nebraska 28
Minnesota 34 Nebraska 23
UCLA 41 Nebraska 21
Georgia 45 Nebraska 31
Ohio State 63 Nebraska 38
South Carolina 30 Nebraska 13
Michigan 45 Nebraska 17

NCAA single game rushing record, facts be damned.

Shocking that he, or she, runs when facts are presented. @500mileRadius
 
I really don't get what's hard about getting the team to line up correctly and go on the snap. The staff has impressed me with how they go about almost everything else, but the penalty situation is embarrassing and it was pointed out a long while back that this was a problem at Oregon St as well.
 
2015 Nebraska, under Banker, is giving up 26.5 PPG, which is .1 PPG higher than Peelini.

2014 Nebraska gave up 26.4 PPG. 2013 Nebraska gave up 24.8 PPG.

Surprised @suhnami hasn't jumped in here since you're living in the past. Oh well, his agenda was already known...

Through 4 games in 2014 ppg: 7, 24, 19, and 31 (scored with 3 sec left).

By my math thats 20.25 ppg through 4 games (just so no one is manipulating stats)...apples to apples

We havent even hit the heart of out schedule this year...we will see how it plays out.
 
If Alex Lewis could just go from seemingly 2 penalties a game down to 1, that'd certainly help the penalty numbers.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT