ADVERTISEMENT

UCLA/Stanford game. No targeting call is BS.

kaz36

Nebraska Legend
Staff
May 2, 2005
30,535
28,042
113
A Stanford player just caught a pass and the UCLA player hit him with the crown of the helmet and knocked him out and he fumbled. No flag on the field and then the booth called for a review and no targeting. This play is the essence of targeting and they blew it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: michaeljjoe
Just insane. It goes to replay and still no call.
The inconsistency of this rule is mind numbing. The two most blatant targeting hits that I have seen this year are no calls. This one and the one in the Texas game with Hunter were complete BS no calls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: michaeljjoe
The inconsistency of this rule is mind numbing. The two most blatant targeting hits that I have seen this year are no calls. This one and the one in the Texas game with Hunter were complete BS no calls.

I just don't get it at all.
 
So can you confirm it is the same refs that officiated the UCLA v. Neb game? If not, STFU. Just as we all have differing opinions on..well..everything, officiating crews have differing views on this rule. Not hard to figure that out, is it?
 
The hit by UT on Hunter from ND was worse and no call and I hate ND
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT