ADVERTISEMENT

Transfer Portal Season

Isaiah Stalbird ended up with a 7 year college career and a national title ring at SDSU. IF they really want to play, they can find a spot. They’re going to bump some guys off FCS, D2 and NAIA rosters.
There’s probably 10 guys on the roster that just want to be included so that they can say they’re on the football team. Several more just doing enough to keep on scholarship, but knowing they don’t have what it takes to push to the top
 
Conference change was a variable that makes it impossible to know with certainty.

What was his record before the conference change? He lost to 6 loss Nebraska, 7 loss Kansas, and 4 loss KSU. Good thing he didn’t move to the Big 8.
 
What was his record before the conference change? He lost to 6 loss Nebraska, 7 loss Kansas, and 4 loss KSU. Good thing he didn’t move to the Big 8.
Best wins were against the #5 & #7 ranked teams in the Big12. The rest were ranked #12-#16 (out of 16), lol.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: headcard
They can transfer to a school where they might get playing time.

If they aren't good enough to get playing time on a 6-6 team then they probably shouldn't be on Nebraska's roster to begin with.
It is the waterfall effect and I'm sure the reference was more towards the non-scholarship players. Guys that could walk-on, contribute on the scout team and be part of a program essentially have no place anymore unless they pick playing ball at a tiny lower division school.
 
I’m not talking about Nebraska. I mean the system is going to vastly reduce the number kids that have an opportunity to play college football. That’s messed up. Many kids that walk on and play because they just want to be there will be told they no longer can. Which will spill down into fcs and division 2. Somewhere down stream kids will no longer be on a team. It’s messed up and unnecessary.
The 105 rule could have been managed effectively by leaving it alone. Sooner or later, teams (like Nebraska?) would have realized that there's such a thing as having too many players. It's called the Law of Diminishing Returns. Eventually, a program gets to a point where adding more players actually produces a negative return. Same is true of anything-- like the size of a coaching staff.
 
WR, OL and DB are my wants. Oh and DT and a pass rusher. 😁
We need two big defensive tackles. Then a CB and WR. That's about it. We've got some good young offensive linemen who are ready to step up. That said, any all-conference performer at any position would be welcome. They gotta be selective. Too many busts taking away reps from our young kids and taking up space in the training room.
 
Is Jeudy worth keeping? I’m not sure. I like the younger talent and he’s never done anything. Helps for depth, but he’s never really produced or moved forward.
We're losing a lot in the middle. Jeudy is the next man up. He's got experience and I like having 22/23 year old men on the defensive line. The thing is he has to bulk up. We have too many 275 pounders getting pushed around inside. Van Poppel was a big factor against Iowa because he has the size to take on a double team. We don't need any DTs losing weight in the off-season. We're not training them to run the 400 meters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Laner2
Do not want another bad Texas WR that was kicked off the team.
This program is not in a position to take gambles on anybody anymore. We've seen it with Gilbert, Omar Manning and several others. I wasn't a fan of bringing in Neyor since he didn't play at Texas. At first, I was hoping that I was wrong, but in the end we all saw Neyor's shortcomings. No more Texas rejects.
 
That one stung but Iowa can’t feel great about their team. Changing OCs did nothing for their offense. At some point they’re going to run out of luck playing the way they do. Their QB fumbled twice on one play and both times the ball bounced back up in to his hands. Odds are that that isn’t going to keep happening for them.
Iowa had a lot of good fortune on their side to win that game. Fans on this board don't want to hear it because of our history of losing. But when your team lines up and kicks Iowa's ass on 75% of the plays from the line of scrimmage, it would be stupid to get rid of everybody.
 
We're losing a lot in the middle. Jeudy is the next man up. He's got experience and I like having 22/23 year old men on the defensive line. The thing is he has to bulk up. We have too many 275 pounders getting pushed around inside. Van Poppel was a big factor against Iowa because he has the size to take on a double team. We don't need any DTs losing weight in the off-season. We're not training them to run the 400 meters.
Yeah, I don't disagree, Jeudy I just thought would be much much better. RVP was a stud as a frosh and you could see the future. I'm hoping some of the younger guys next year are the same. Jeudy to me is just another guy that hasn't done much. I like the idea of having a grown man in the trenches, but I'd also see what might be out there in the portal to replace him. Maybe we can get someone with more of a motor and killer mentality. I feel a little bit of the same on Butler. I like what JB brings, but he is so inconsistent and that is what kills this team. You aren't going to be a super star in every game, but you can't just disappear. Seems weird that Princewill, Lenhardt, and others seemed to disappear a bit this year.
 
Do you ever stfu? I mean seriously. I hate to even respond because I think you might actually be mentally disabled.
Are you drunk off your ass posting at 2:44 A.M.?

I called you out because you were clearly wrong, and several posters agreed you were wrong. Handle it like a man instead of a female dog.
 
The 105 rule could have been managed effectively by leaving it alone. Sooner or later, teams (like Nebraska?) would have realized that there's such a thing as having too many players. It's called the Law of Diminishing Returns. Eventually, a program gets to a point where adding more players actually produces a negative return. Same is true of anything-- like the size of a coaching staff.
I suspect privately Rhule doesn’t mind this new limit. Yeah he was a walk on but now he’ll get 20 more scholarship guys and won’t have to try to manage all those walk ons. Maybe it opens a few scholarships for a Nebraska kid who wouldn’t have been on scholarship before. It might have been a better idea to implement this slowly with a limit on walk ons of say 10-15 decreasing by 5 every year.

Technically you can still have walk ons if you don’t want to give out all of your scholarships. Some cash strapped programs may do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: headcard
I suspect privately Rhule doesn’t mind this new limit. Yeah he was a walk on but now he’ll get 20 more scholarship guys and won’t have to try to manage all those walk ons. Maybe it opens a few scholarships for a Nebraska kid who wouldn’t have been on scholarship before. It might have been a better idea to implement this slowly with a limit on walk ons of say 10-15 decreasing by 5 every year.

Technically you can still have walk ons if you don’t want to give out all of your scholarships. Some cash strapped programs may do that.
Privately, none of these coaches actually mind it. There’s now a built in excuse for the previously hard talk coaches wanted to have with several guys but could let really… and now they can.
“Sorry, but with the 105 hard limit now, I think you’ll be a better fit at a G5 or 1-AA school if you want to play”.
And, younger guys will get more reps and hopefully develop quicker… hopefully
 
Nope. I'm in Doha Qatar idiot. Travelling in style. Eat shit you soft bitch.
Anthony Anderson Abc GIF by HULU
 
Nope. I'm in Doha Qatar idiot. Travelling in style. Eat shit you soft bitch.
Good for you, not many get the opportunity. My advice to you is to enjoy it instead of spending your energy and time arguing with people and acting like a jackass on a message board. Never have I been hostile towards you. Not sure why you feel the need to be that way towards me.
 
Good for you, not many get the opportunity. My advice to you is to enjoy it instead of spending your energy and time arguing with people and acting like a jackass on a message board. Never have I been hostile towards you. Not sure why you feel the need to be that way towards me.
Nope. I'll do whatever I want. I don't think the message board is the place for you and I like spending some time on the good ole board in my down time.
 
  • Love
Reactions: itseasyas1-2-3
Nope. I'll do whatever I want. I don't think the message board is the place for you and I like spending some time on the good ole board in my down time.
The Big Lebowski Dude GIF


Glad you're enjoying the board. And I do think you're a good poster here. I'm enjoying the board too, though wish it could move beyond this Jr high crap. We're all just here to discuss some Husker football.
 
Last edited:
The 105 rule could have been managed effectively by leaving it alone. Sooner or later, teams (like Nebraska?) would have realized that there's such a thing as having too many players. It's called the Law of Diminishing Returns. Eventually, a program gets to a point where adding more players actually produces a negative return. Same is true of anything-- like the size of a coaching staff.
I agree with you - addition by subtraction

Coaches can now put more focus developing less players.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT