The tax difference alone could help them attract FA players to Vegas versus Oakland.too large of payroll disparities for consistent competitive balance
Matt Scherzer makes almost 10 million more per year than the entire Cincinnati Reds payroll
The tax difference alone could help them attract FA players to Vegas versus Oakland.too large of payroll disparities for consistent competitive balance
Matt Scherzer makes almost 10 million more per year than the entire Cincinnati Reds payroll
I agree it's absolutely crazy money, but I won't be surprised if it happens.I just read somewhere that the Chiefs are slow-playing stadium and facility improvements because they think they might be moving in the near future as well.
******************************************************
Jackson County will need to step up in a big way with a new stadium. Monied peeps on the KS side would love to steal them. Hunt family has maximum leverage now.
The best move is to put the Royals somewhere else, teardown Kaufman and rebuild Arrowhead on its site. it will only cost a zillion dollars.
I went to a Chiefs game at Arrowhead 5 years ago. I thought the stadium was just fine. Concourses were big enough etc. I think the push for newer stadiums is driven by the desire for more skyboxes, restaurants etc. Most real football fans don’t care that much about those things as long as they get a seat back and easy access to beer, brats and toilets.I just read somewhere that the Chiefs are slow-playing stadium and facility improvements because they think they might be moving in the near future as well.
******************************************************
Jackson County will need to step up in a big way with a new stadium. Monied peeps on the KS side would love to steal them. Hunt family has maximum leverage now.
The best move is to put the Royals somewhere else, teardown Kaufman and rebuild Arrowhead on its site. it will only cost a zillion dollars.
Most municipalities are trying to spend themselves rich. The push to spend money on city owned recreational facilities is astounding with it being tough to justify the cost with tax revenue generation let alone the idea that they might somehow be self supporting.I agree it's absolutely crazy money, but I won't be surprised if it happens.
Broncos new ownership is anxious to shutter a fairly modern stadium and build a new stadium and some kind of surrounding "village" out by the airport. But that idea probably won't fly as long as the product on the field is a shitshow.
But hey man, every 30 years we might get to host a Final Four and every 50 we might get a Super Bowl!Most municipalities are trying to spend themselves rich. The push to spend money on city owned recreational facilities is astounding with it being tough to justify the cost with tax revenue generation let alone the idea that they might somehow be self supporting.
building a stadium the public can enjoy to house a product the community can unite around & take pride in is better than sending tax dollars unrequited into a dark well while filth, potholes & regulation continue their never ending march toward total dominationMost municipalities are trying to spend themselves rich. The push to spend money on city owned recreational facilities is astounding with it being tough to justify the cost with tax revenue generation let alone the idea that they might somehow be self supporting.
calls people losers for making things about politicsJesus, some of ya’lls whole identity revolves around politics.
Losers.
Good for Oakland for not using hundreds of millions to subsidize corporate greed. It would be different if they didn’t already have a stadium, but they do. A new stadium isn’t going to dramatically change their market or impact the economy. It’s just to subsidize a private business that isn’t doing well in a market that doesn’t care about their product.
My post was mostly directed at you. Seems you picked up on that. Chefs kiss, indeed.calls people losers for making things about politics
same post, makes things about politics
*chef's kiss*
I'm aware.My post was mostly directed at you. Seems you picked up on that. Chefs kiss, indeed.
Haha says the guy that only post about politics.Jesus, some of ya’lls whole identity revolves around politics.
Losers.
Good for Oakland for not using hundreds of millions to subsidize corporate greed. It would be different if they didn’t already have a stadium, but they do. A new stadium isn’t going to dramatically change their market or impact the economy. It’s just to subsidize a private business that isn’t doing well in a market that doesn’t care about their product.
I was literally going to say that the As moves and organization remind me of Major League, like they want to relocate. I get oakland wasnt helping things either.Reminiscent of the Indians in Major League…. My friend who played for the As in the 70s said that stadium was a shithole back then. Sewers would back up. Locker rooms were tiny dumps.
I hope not. Royals were caught planting people on social media acting like they are for a new stadium. Very unpopular wth most fans.Are the Royals really going to build a new stadium downtown? The one they have is pretty nice as it is, always has been too.
Omaha and the CWS park?Most municipalities are trying to spend themselves rich. The push to spend money on city owned recreational facilities is astounding with it being tough to justify the cost with tax revenue generation let alone the idea that they might somehow be self supporting.
I went to a Chiefs game at Arrowhead 5 years ago. I thought the stadium was just fine. Concourses were big enough etc. I think the push for newer stadiums is driven by the desire for more skyboxes, restaurants etc. Most real football fans don’t care that much about those things as long as they get a seat back and easy access to beer, brats and to
Mmmmaybe. Not sure about the cost/benefit analysis of that deal. The CWS is a cash cow for Omaha and that stadium is pretty barebones compared to some of the pro stadiums.Omaha and the CWS park?
It’s a lot of money in some prime real estate for a single event. Im sure after a decade it paid for itself.Mmmmaybe. Not sure about the cost/benefit analysis of that deal. The CWS is a cash cow for Omaha and that stadium is pretty barebones compared to some of the pro stadiums.
Omaha squeezed a commitment out of the NCAA to keep the CWS there for 25 years, which was pretty unprecedented. The alternative was to keep making fairly expensive upgrades to Rosenblatt, only to have the NCAA come back every 2 or 3 years with another wish list.Mmmmaybe. Not sure about the cost/benefit analysis of that deal. The CWS is a cash cow for Omaha and that stadium is pretty barebones compared to some of the pro stadiums.
That's a pretty easy analysis. The AAA affiliate had no desire to continue playing downtown because they NEED easy access for suburban families in order to have any attendance at all. They also had no desire to continue playing in a 25,000 seat stadium that looks empty with 5,000 fans. It certainly doesn't make sense from a budget standpoint but as long as Papillion was a willing partner it makes all the sense in the world for the team.I don’t think I ever completely understood why the AAA affiliate isn’t playing there. If you are going to replace a piece of history with something new, at least put everything you can into it to make it nice.
It sure sounds like the Royals are moving downtown. They say that the cost to maintain their current stadium (which is 50 years old, and among the oldest in the league) is the same or more than the cost of building a new one. They are going to have to provide some documentation to support that.Are the Royals really going to build a new stadium downtown? The one they have is pretty nice as it is, always has been too.
Mostly agree, except in 1 case in professional sports… the A’s. They literally play in a sewer infested shithole. Wrigley and Fenway are also crapholes, but the fan bases have convinced themselves they are great places because that’s where their great grandparents went to watch gamesJesus, some of ya’lls whole identity revolves around politics.
Losers.
Good for Oakland for not using hundreds of millions to subsidize corporate greed. It would be different if they didn’t already have a stadium, but they do. A new stadium isn’t going to dramatically change their market or impact the economy. It’s just to subsidize a private business that isn’t doing well in a market that doesn’t care about their product.
There was a little chatter about possibly building out toward the airport as well. While maybe not as good for KC, it would be great to have a stadium up North for us going down to catch a gameIt sure sounds like the Royals are moving downtown. They say that the cost to maintain their current stadium (which is 50 years old, and among the oldest in the league) is the same or more than the cost of building a new one. They are going to have to provide some documentation to support that.
That said, I like the idea of a downtown ballpark. The cities/ballparks I've been to (Denver, Minneapolis, Boston) that have this make for a great experience.
And I don't know why people are so down on the Royals this year. They are just like the Chiefs. They win one game a week.
Has their attendance increased since moving to papillon? Des Moines AAA affiliate sells about 50% more tickets than Omaha with their downtown ballpark. I have to assume a lot of those sales are corporate since their park is almost never full.That's a pretty easy analysis. The AAA affiliate had no desire to continue playing downtown because they NEED easy access for suburban families in order to have any attendance at all. They also had no desire to continue playing in a 25,000 seat stadium that looks empty with 5,000 fans. It certainly doesn't make sense from a budget standpoint but as long as Papillion was a willing partner it makes all the sense in the world for the team.
It doesn't seem like their average attendance has increased since moving, it's always around 4,000/game and that's about what it was at Rosenblatt. You have to take into account though that "Omaha" has changed a lot in the last decade and will continue to move west.Has their attendance increased since moving to papillon? Des Moines AAA affiliate sells about 50% more tickets than Omaha with their downtown ballpark. I have to assume a lot of those sales are corporate since their park is almost never full.
That wasn’t such prime real estate until they built the ballpark. It was mostly run down buildings and parking lots. It spun off a lot of restaurants and lodging in the area. From a national visibility standpoint it’s a huge marketing tool for Omaha. Is it worth the price tag? Who knows.It’s a lot of money in some prime real estate for a single event. Im sure after a decade it paid for itself.
I don’t think I ever completely understood why the AAA affiliate isn’t playing there. If you are going to replace a piece of history with something new, at least put everything you can into it to make it nice.
"unbiased" people will tell you that the growth around the ballpark is merely a coincidence, not a causeThat wasn’t such prime real estate until they built the ballpark. It was mostly run down buildings and parking lots. It spun off a lot of restaurants and lodging in the area. From a national visibility standpoint it’s a huge marketing tool for Omaha. Is it worth the price tag? Who knows.
I think the CWS situation was somewhat unique in that Omaha proved to be a pretty tough negotiator. At the time, I don't think anyone really believed the NCAA would sign off on a 25-year commitment - but they did."unbiased" people will tell you that the growth around the ballpark is merely a coincidence, not a cause
they'll say that growth was just stolen from other areas of the city, and stadium-centered economic development is a zero sum game
Might be true. Anything that slows the sprawl to the west is okay by me."unbiased" people will tell you that the growth around the ballpark is merely a coincidence, not a cause
they'll say that growth was just stolen from other areas of the city, and stadium-centered economic development is a zero sum game
That was the only way Omaha could publicly justify the capital outlay. Revenue projections from public recreation projects like pools and stadiums are always insanely optimistic. Glad Omaha did it but I’m not sure how much it’s contributed to the huge jump my property taxes on our 2nd home in Omaha are to blame for it. 50% increase in 5 years. People blame inflated home values but they could lower levies to compensate for that some.I think the CWS situation was somewhat unique in that Omaha proved to be a pretty tough negotiator. At the time, I don't think anyone really believed the NCAA would sign off on a 25-year commitment - but they did.
Maybe it's childhood nostalgia but I don't care how nice the bars and the stadium are, give me Rosenblatt any day. Been back to 2 games in the new stadium. Everything seems fake and forced. Understand why they did it though.Omaha squeezed a commitment out of the NCAA to keep the CWS there for 25 years, which was pretty unprecedented. The alternative was to keep making fairly expensive upgrades to Rosenblatt, only to have the NCAA come back every 2 or 3 years with another wish list.
I'll always feel like the CWS belongs at Rosenblatt but under the circumstances, I can understand why Omaha opted to build new.
All the Royals need is the shiny new downtown stadium that Sherman is pining for. That’ll fix all their issues. 😂Can we send the Royals with them? Maybe if they combine the two teams they can come up with a .500 record.
I also have trouble with change. The problem is that without the new stadium the CWS was gonzo.Maybe it's childhood nostalgia but I don't care how nice the bars and the stadium are, give me Rosenblatt any day. Been back to 2 games in the new stadium. Everything seems fake and forced. Understand why they did it though.
The CWS was never leaving Omaha , the issue was if Omaha was building a new stadium over revamping Rosenblatte again was a long term contract which they got , The only stadiums in the country big enough are basically Professional parks and they are not giving up 15 days on a Road trip to host this.I also have trouble with change. The problem is that without the new stadium the CWS was gonzo.
I don’t believe that’s true. The NCAA was looking at alternative sites. Trying to fix Rosenblatt didn’t seem very logical to me.The CWS was never leaving Omaha , the issue was if Omaha was building a new stadium over revamping Rosenblatte again was a long term contract which they got , The only stadiums in the country big enough are basically Professional parks and they are not giving up 15 days on a Road trip to host this.
My daughter rides BART from near Berkeley to the downtown financial district in SF. Scares the hell out of me but she only does it during normal commuting hours. It’s kind of the Herring school philosophy. Travel in huge numbers and hope you’re not the 1-2% the sharks get when they decide to feed.Oakland is one of those cities like Detroit that looked wonderful in 1946 while Nagasaki was in ruins. Now Nagasaki looks wonderful and Oakland looks like this. I expect a lot of residents in the area can't afford to go to baseball games and those who can are hesitant to drive or take BART into town .
![]()
I also have trouble with change. The problem is that without the new stadium the CWS was gonzo.