ADVERTISEMENT

The BIG wants to maximize the number of teams in the CFB playoff

Playing the bottom quarter of the B1G is as cupcake as any 4 non-P5 teams in the country, and arguably moreso because of the compete dearth of skill player/quarterback talent

Many B1G teams play northwestern/Rutgers/Indiana in (gasp!) November/October. That is a bye week, just like the SEC

Those teams suck ass today, tomorrow and throughout history
Rutgers/Northwestern/Indiana is still a step up from the likes of Troy, South Alabama, Buffalo, and Northern Illinois.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedRed78
They want that just so everybody gets another guaranteed home game every year instead of every other year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: saluno22
Rutgers/Northwestern/Indiana is still a step up from the likes of Troy, South Alabama, Buffalo, and Northern Illinois.
Wrong

Northwestern lost to an FCS school at home just last year

We routinely beat those 3 B1G schools

Can’t say the same for Troy & No ill
 
Not just for bowling. If we are playoff eligible but three of our wins are vs. FCS teams and the teams ahead of us only have 1 wins or no wins vs FCS teams, that might keep us out of the playoffs.
Nah getting these extra bye weeks will allow Nebraska to go undefeated. They can't stop the BIG winner from going to the playoffs lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truewooper
We lost to Northwestern just last season. We lost to Indiana in 2019. Still undefeated against Rutgers, so I guess we got that going in our favor.
We belong in that same conversation as a B1G team that’s been worse than many G5s

Like someone said before, ohiost vs Nebraska in October has essentially been a bye week for them

Playing Rutgers is easier than playing probably 2 dozen non-P5s and a handful of FCS programs. Not an opinion, a fact
 
  • Like
Reactions: lazysunday
playing iowast every season, your team is one that barely checked the P5 box anyhow

I am not surprised you are in favor of your beloved conference becoming more of a cowardly laughing stock than it already is
I was just about to ask, why Iowa doesn't have to abide by the P5 schedule. Then I realized they play that shitty in-state rivalry with ISU every year. LOL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: king_kong_
We belong in that same conversation as a B1G team that’s been worse than many G5s

Like someone said before, ohiost vs Nebraska in October has essentially been a bye week for them

Playing Rutgers is easier than playing probably 2 dozen non-P5s and a handful of FCS programs. Not an opinion, a fact
WOW 2 dozen stretching your neck out there Sparky on this one..
 
WOW 2 dozen stretching your neck out there Sparky on this one..
24 G5 teams and a handful of FCS teams would beat rutgers every year

I can't name a single G5 conference they'd be favored to win

anyone who says otherwise is ignorant to simple facts
 
Jim Delany pushed for the 9 game schedule to increase tv revenue. I don't believe the conference had any concern whatsoever about making it into the playoffs type thing. It was all about money. Same could be said for the next guy, who tried to cancel the football season during covid.

The conference crossover games for years have not been done out of fairness to schools, but to increase revenue with the best rated games possible. It's always been about money.

Now all of a sudden they care about the playoffs?

It seems that way.. welcome incoming Commish Tony Petitti.

To me this signals a shift in thinking that is different from the prior two guys.

 
Jim Delany pushed for the 9 game schedule to increase tv revenue. I don't believe the conference had any concern whatsoever about making it into the playoffs type thing. It was all about money. Same could be said for the next guy, who tried to cancel the football season during covid.

The conference crossover games for years have not been done out of fairness to schools, but to increase revenue with the best rated games possible. It's always been about money.

Now all of a sudden they care about the playoffs?

It seems that way.. welcome incoming Commish Tony Petitti.

To me this signals a shift in thinking that is different from the prior two guys.

it's still all about money

the playoffs are tripling in participation

perfect for a league like the B1G to garner back pats without winning anything (a B1G specialty)
 
Surprised I haven't seen anyone comment that if the BIG drops those games, and the SEC keeps their current format this is a great strategy to knock out the acc, big 12, pac 12 from the playoffs longterm.
I don't see how those other conferences have any good strategy for representation in the near future anyway.. it's going to become the SEC and B1G. You have both sides accumulating schools, so it's going to end up a 2 conference league eventually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redblood23
Rutgers has beaten Boston College, Temple twice Syracuse, Delaware,U mass in the last 4 years.
Those are the facts.. Thank you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedRed78
Rutgers has beaten Boston College, Temple twice Syracuse, Delaware,U mass in the last 4 years.
Those are the facts.. Thank you.
which G5 conference would they be favored to win?

certainly not the AAC
 
Why are U moving the goal post from
The original disagreement?
I'm not. here's a recap:

24 G5 teams and a handful of FCS teams would beat rutgers every year

I can't name a single G5 conference they'd be favored to win

anyone who says otherwise is ignorant to simple facts


your post of 6 random results is utterly meaningless
 
for reference, in their last matchup 5 years ago, buffalo beat rutgers 42-13 at rutgers

the year before rutgers lost to eastern michigan, also at home. eastern michigan finished that season 5-7

CC: @moralvictories @BleedRed78
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BleedRed78
I'm not. here's a recap:

24 G5 teams and a handful of FCS teams would beat rutgers every year

I can't name a single G5 conference they'd be favored to win

anyone who says otherwise is ignorant to simple facts


your post of 6 random results is utterly meaningless
Read your first line.. That’s my only point..
Take care buddy no longer want to engage ..
 
Surprised I haven't seen anyone comment that if the BIG drops those games, and the SEC keeps their current format this is a great strategy to knock out the acc, big 12, pac 12 from the playoffs longterm.
Top 6 conference winners get an auto bid I think. So at least one of them will get in. Unless that changed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: king_kong_
Surprised I haven't seen anyone comment that if the BIG drops those games, and the SEC keeps their current format this is a great strategy to knock out the acc, big 12, pac 12 from the playoffs longterm.
Exactly. It was a superconference move in all likelihood.
 
We belong in that same conversation as a B1G team that’s been worse than many G5s

Like someone said before, ohiost vs Nebraska in October has essentially been a bye week for them

Playing Rutgers is easier than playing probably 2 dozen non-P5s and a handful of FCS programs. Not an opinion, a fact
Most G5 teams are a joke. Most of the good ones like UCF, Cincinnati, and Houston are moving up to the P5 level. Boise State is one of the few crown jewels left at the G5 level that haven't been invited to a P5 conference.
The only G5 teams I would put above Rutgers are Fresno State, Boise State, Coastal Carolina, and Liberty. The rest are complete jokes. The only FCS team that might be able to beat Rutgers aside from a fluke upset would be North Dakota State, since they have a history of beating teams from the power 5 level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedRed78
Surprised I haven't seen anyone comment that if the BIG drops those games, and the SEC keeps their current format this is a great strategy to knock out the acc, big 12, pac 12 from the playoffs longterm.
They're not going to be knocked out with an expanded number of playoff teams. Quite the contrary. Each P5 conference champ is guaranteed a spot in the expanded playoffs.
 
I believe the next media deal is due around 2030.
Would expect the BIG to get to 20 teams

10 conference games in a 1-9-9 format + 2 home nonconf patsies each year
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedRed78
Most G5 teams are a joke. Most of the good ones like UCF, Cincinnati, and Houston are moving up to the P5 level. Boise State is one of the few crown jewels left at the G5 level that haven't been invited to a P5 conference.
The only G5 teams I would put above Rutgers are Fresno State, Boise State, Coastal Carolina, and Liberty. The rest are complete jokes. The only FCS team that might be able to beat Rutgers aside from a fluke upset would be North Dakota State, since they have a history of beating teams from the power 5 level.
So, we’re going to ignore on-field results and instead use feelings?

How very B1G of you
 
I believe the next media deal is due around 2030.
Would expect the BIG to get to 20 teams

10 conference games in a 1-9-9 format + 2 home nonconf patsies each year
So in 7 years B1G will go back to playing in divisions?🤔
 
So in 7 years B1G will go back to playing in divisions?🤔
I don’t think there will be divisions

There will be one protected rivalry and you will play a group of 9 home and away and then the other group of 9 home and away

You will play every team home and away over a 4 year span
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedRed78
with USC and UCLA coming, there is no way we don’t have at least 4-5 teams in each year. Same with the SEC. Then maybe 2-4 spots for the rest, the Utahs and Clemson and FSU, etc. and ND

It will be exciting, once we are actually good again
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedRed78
I don’t think there will be divisions

There will be one protected rivalry and you will play a group of 9 home and away and then the other group of 9 home and away

You will play every team home and away over a 4 year span
I’m going to wait until they do the new schedule’s with UCLA and USC and how they arrive at rivalry games with 16 teams before saying only one protected rivalry game with the arrival of 20 teams…

I believe there will always be 2 protected rivalry games on the schedules..
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedRed78
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT