ADVERTISEMENT

Texas - $13.5 million NIL

Redmich

Senior
Jun 21, 2022
2,611
5,435
113
Paid out to football and basketball over the last 2 years (if accurate) - if you estimate 80 athletes that’s an avg of more than $160,000 per athlete

The BIG needs to declare their athletes employees so the athletic funds can be paid directly to them rather than frivolous things like fancy locker rooms

 
  • Like
Reactions: king_kong_
Casual people can just blurt out whatever idea they think of, but the fact is that making these kids actual employees would be a disaster for the schools.
If folks knew anything about tort law, liability, etc they would understand.
Not just college, but Uber drivers, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GILL T
Casual people can just blurt out whatever idea they think of, but the fact is that making these kids actual employees would be a disaster for the schools.
If folks knew anything about tort law, liability, etc they would understand.
Not just college, but Uber drivers, etc.
We’ll see …. it may very well get there .. in fact some lawyers who I presume understand tort law, liability etc have already “blurted out” their opinion that the concept has legal merit


 
Last edited:
Paid out to football and basketball over the last 2 years (if accurate) - if you estimate 80 athletes that’s an avg of more than $160,000 per athlete

The BIG needs to declare their athletes employees so the athletic funds can be paid directly to them rather than frivolous things like fancy locker rooms


Some will have been paid more than the average and many less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redmich
this is awesome

what an incredible opportunity!
 
We’ll see …. it may very well get there .. in fact some lawyers who I presume understand tort law, liability etc have already “blurted out” their opinion that the concept has legal merit


NLRB doesn’t have the authority. That would need to come from SSA or the courts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redmich
NLRB doesn’t have the authority. That would need to come from SSA or the courts.
Yes, agree … I was just saying there is enough legal merit for it to make it into the courts based on legal opinions as opposed to being outright rejected as something some rando just “blurted out”

Many of the same arguments were made before NIL was challenged and the NCAA was laughed out of the Supreme Court with a 9-0 ruling
 
Lets say that the schools started supplying the money as opposed to the boosters. Would Title 9 require that female athletes get the same benefits that males do? Would all male athletes get the same amounts? Just asking those who have a better understanding of all this.
 
Paid out to football and basketball over the last 2 years (if accurate) - if you estimate 80 athletes that’s an avg of more than $160,000 per athlete

The BIG needs to declare their athletes employees so the athletic funds can be paid directly to them rather than frivolous things like fancy locker rooms


Does it matter? If the BIG 10 went that route the SEC would follow suit and we'd be behind again. Trying to keep up with Texas money is pointless.
 
Does it matter? If the BIG 10 went that route the SEC would follow suit and we'd be behind again. Trying to keep up with Texas money is pointless.
The conference payout in the BIG right now is higher than the SEC- while we wouldn’t surpass Texas we could close the delta … it would also really distance ourselves from the B12-ACC-PAC schools

Right now our donor base is being directed toward new facilities, stadium upgrades, contract buyouts, etc etc (shit that pales in comparison to talent acquisition if you are actually interested in winning) rather than being directed to NIL
 
The conference payout in the BIG right now is higher than the SEC- while we wouldn’t surpass Texas we could close the delta … it would also really distance ourselves from the B12-ACC-PAC schools

Right now our donor base is being directed toward new facilities, stadium upgrades, contract buyouts, etc etc (shit that pales in comparison to talent acquisition if you are actually interested in winning) rather than being directed to NIL
this post requires an asterisk

to the best of my knowledge, the record-setting media deal that is the pride of all B1G land has yet to be completed

the final numbers, based on B1G leadership's selling what was not theirs to sell (B1G football rights belong to FOX and michigan refuses to play night games after a certain date), are certain to be lower than what was initially reported and ejaculated over

CBS and NBC will be broadcasting 2nd and 3rd tier B1G games and their monetary outlay will be commensurate
 
Does it matter? If the BIG 10 went that route the SEC would follow suit and we'd be behind again. Trying to keep up with Texas money is pointless.

Rutgers is going to earn more money from the Big Ten in 2024 than Georgia will from the SEC.
 
Rutgers is going to earn more money from the Big Ten in 2024 than Georgia will from the SEC.
has the media deal been finalized?

here's the last update, haven't heard a peep since:

 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT