He attributes all of his successes in the NBA to watching Brian Conklin.Reminds me of Joe McCray
Oh he is very cocky ...I am actually surprised he hasnt caught more flak for his post shot anticsI bought Warriors season tickets three years ago because of Curry and I am entertained and amazed at every game. His creativity reminds me of "Pitol Pete Maravich" and his shooting of "Kobe Bryant", though, in a league of his own.
The thing I really like about him ... no tattoos, no jewelry, no trash talk.
Oh he is very cocky ...I am actually surprised he hasnt caught more flak for his post shot antics
I don't doubt that he has put in the time to get as good as he is, so he has every right to enjoy it. I never actually thought of it as cockiness, but that is what it looks like.
He kind of looks like he is just as excited, if not more, as the Warrior fans and now that he has become such a popular player, he is soaking up the glory.
His play says he is very confident in his shooting abilities and he has a great team around him that helps keep defenses (NBA plays defense?) honest.
The only problem is that he is (already has?) becoming too confident that it's become cockiness.
Just like all of the greats (individuals or teams), he will become hated as much as he is loved and there won't be a middle gray area.
Man I don't know about that. He seems like a super likeable guy so far.
Doing a shimmy dance, basically on the bench of the other team after hitting a 3 pointer is pretty douchy.
.
Absolutely agree. Will not question his talent and shooting ability but the NBA is nowhere near as physical as it once was. Don't get me wrong, he would be a great player no matter the era, but I question whether he would go anywhere near the lane if he ever had to play the Pistons in the 80's (for example).Bring back the hand check, and we will see how good he is. He is the best shooter for sure, but for me he is nowhere near the best player.
Wasn't this done after he hit a game winner 3 pointer from Canada border? People don't mind that stuff. If he were to do something douchy every time he hit a shot it would be different, but I've watched him play (on TV only) and would never use the word douchy to describe what I saw, but admittedly I don't see him much. He's great for the league and so far, everyone seems to love him. He is one of the few NBA players I tune in for. For me it's pretty much LeBron, and Curry, and I feel like I can turn the TV on when the finals roll around this year and be all caught up.
Absolutely agree. Will not question his talent and shooting ability but the NBA is nowhere near as physical as it once was. Don't get me wrong, he would be a great player no matter the era, but I question whether he would go anywhere near the lane if he ever had to play the Pistons in the 80's (for example).
Absolutely agree. Will not question his talent and shooting ability but the NBA is nowhere near as physical as it once was. Don't get me wrong, he would be a great player no matter the era, but I question whether he would go anywhere near the lane if he ever had to play the Pistons in the 80's (for example).
Lebron nowhere near gets hit like the 80s and 90s. Curry is going to light it up in any era. Best shooter there is, but he is going no where near the paint in the 80s and 90s.I agree with your post, but I think I just saw LeBron shaking his head to that comment as he gets mauled every game and wines about it and still doesn't get the call
Ok, how about the Bulls/Jazz/Lakers/Trailblazers/Pistons/Celtics in the 80's/90's. My point isn't that he's not a great player, my point is that in another era he wouldn't have the ability to be the all-around player he is today because he doesn't have the physical build to do it.I love these arguments: Pick one of the stoutest defenses in the history of the NBA and say Curry would struggle against them.
Similar obvious argument: Adrian Peterson/Barry Sanders/whatever RB wouldn't have as many yards if he was facing the Pittsburgh Steel Curtain defense.
We could play the era game all day, doesn't take away the fact the Curry is having one of the most incredible shooting/scoring seasons ever.
He's not only hitting at such a high shooting/3 pt percentage the league has ever seen, he's doing it while crossing people, using step backs and 30 ft shots while leading the league in scoring at the same time.
I bought Warriors season tickets three years ago because of Curry and I am entertained and amazed at every game. His creativity reminds me of "Pistol Pete Maravich" and his shooting of "Kobe Bryant", though, in a league of his own.
The thing I really like about him ... no tattoos, no jewelry, no trash talk.
Im not a fan of the era comparisons. Just as the rules have changed, so have the incredible physical talents of NBA athletes. Bigger, Faster, Stronger. The Bad Boys were one of my favorite teams of all time, but they would look like were in quicksand against this Warriors squad. Laimbeer, The Microwave, Mark Aguirre, James Edwards, etc... They would be watching as the Warriors flew by. Dumars and the Worm could defend in any era. Sure, the league was more physical then, but athletes are more physically superior now.
Lol. No. Athletes are faster, stronger and more physically gifted across the board....in every sport. Why do you think world records continue to fall in the olympics? In an era where Jordan was far and away the best athlete in the league, the nba now has dozens of athlete that can do what Jordan did with regard to athleticism. He would still dominate today because of his training, incredible skill set, focus and incredible will to win, but plenty of guys can dunk from the free throw line now.No they are not
A 40 inch vertical now was a 40 inch vertical 30 years ago.
Difference is the game is more guard oriented and the rules allow the athleticism to shine.
Who wants to go flying through the paint when they knew ow they are going to end up on their back.
There isn't a person in this NBA more athletic than David Thompson or Ralph Sampson were.
Absolutely agree. Will not question his talent and shooting ability but the NBA is nowhere near as physical as it once was. Don't get me wrong, he would be a great player no matter the era, but I question whether he would go anywhere near the lane if he ever had to play the Pistons in the 80's (for example).
Fair enough. I see your point.Ok, how about the Bulls/Jazz/Lakers/Trailblazers/Pistons/Celtics in the 80's/90's. My point isn't that he's not a great player, my point is that in another era he wouldn't have the ability to be the all-around player he is today because he doesn't have the physical build to do it.
It's not a knock on him, it's an observation about how much the game has changed.
Bring back the hand check, and we will see how good he is. He is the best shooter for sure, but for me he is nowhere near the best player.
Lol. No. Athletes are faster, stronger and more physically gifted across the board....in every sport. Why do you think world records continue to fall in the olympics? In an era where Jordan was far and away the best athlete in the league, the nba now has dozens of athlete that can do what Jordan did with regard to athleticism. He would still dominate today because of his training, incredible skill set, focus and incredible will to win, but plenty of guys can dunk from the free throw line now.
Steph "who you calling scrawny" Curry
Durant
JR Smith
Without being too abrasive, saying "bring back the handcheck" is one of the dumber things you could say. It's like saying, "let DBs contact WRs all over the field and we'll see how good they are." That's not the point of the game, and kudos to the NBA for emphasizing freedom of movement. Basketball is meant to be a finesse sport. There is physicality in the game, sometimes more than there should be, but seeing one of the most skilled players to ever play the game and say, "let him get held, pushed, knocked down, and generally the crap knocked out of him, then tell me he's a great player," is sort of silly when we're talking a sport that, at it's best, is a showcase of skill, athleticism, and finesse.