I agree. How do you know if they're going to run or kick. Especially if they're coming at you and at the last minute try to punt. All defender can hope for is he gets a piece of the ball.Great rule change, IMO.
This. Ridiculous it took this long. I would think this would have a major impact on that style of punting. Potential for some huge hits. Put that Fields kid from okie on punt block. He looks like he wants to hurt people.Way, way overdue.
No. The rule specifically says 5 yards behind the original starting point of the punter. A punter can move forward, or laterally as much as they want and still have all the protections afforded to a punter.
The SEC finally got something right for once.Thank you, SEC!
No. The rule specifically says 5 yards behind the original starting point of the punter. A punter can move forward, or laterally as much as they want and still have all the protections afforded to a punter.
Another cluster f for the officialssounds like open to interpretation.
I can't find a (free) 2023 rulebook for quoting chapter and section. I have to assume this transcription was accurate:"Originally standing" is what I am reading...to which I am taking that to mean in any direction...no??
Ya I read the rule and the play in question was not a rugby style kicking situation. The ball was snapped over the punters head at the 25 he retrieved the ball at his 4 started running up field and punted the ball as he was being tackled. They called roughing on Missouri. I think if it’s a bad snap Over his head I think he is free game and doesn’t get the normal punter protection At least that’s how I read it.No. The rule specifically says 5 yards behind the original starting point of the punter. A punter can move forward, or laterally as much as they want and still have all the protections afforded to a punter.
That’s makes sense. Because the Missouri-Kentucky game was not a Rugby style kick it was a bad snap way over his head and he ran like 10 yds before he kicked it. They just added the Rugby style because you assume you’re a runner at that point. Good rule.I can't find a (free) 2023 rulebook for quoting chapter and section. I have to assume this transcription was accurate:
Yahoo Sports Article - NCAA Punter Rule Change
“The kicker’s protection under this rule ends (a) when the kicker has had a reasonable time to regain their balance, (b) when the kicker carries or possesses the ball outside the tackle box before kicking or (c) when the kicker carries or possesses the ball more than five yards behind the kicker’s initial position at the snap from scrimmage kick formation.”
Considering they have been winning the vast majority of CFB championships. I'm think all other conferences should try and get things right.The SEC finally got something right for once.
No if he simply drops it and punts from the same spot it’s a normal situation.So once there is a puffed catch on the punter he is open game…
Like it.
I mean he tries to avoid the block and takes more than 3 steps to the side to punt..No if he simply drops it and punts from the same spot it’s a normal situation.
He has to be outside the tackle box , this is going to still be tricky because every official is still going to have his interpretation of the Tackle boxI mean he tries to avoid the block and takes more than 3 steps to the side to punt..
No. The rule specifically says 5 yards behind the original starting point of the punter. A punter can move forward, or laterally as much as they want and still have all the protections afforded to a punter.
The 5 yds is a snap that goes over his head or he mishandles a snap and it goes 5 yds behind him. Otherwise he has to be outside the tackle box. If he punts inside the tackle box even if he leaves his original spot he is still protected as usual."Originally standing" is what I am reading...to which I am taking that to mean in any direction...no??
Fantastic. I believe the NFL has a rule that makes that whole shield punt protection illegal. That should be the next step.