ADVERTISEMENT

Some Positive Stats

What’s the standard, perfection?

Not saying don’t be critical and don’t evaluate the HC. I am saying find the larger picture of the positive vs the negatives. There are multiple threads on here about HH and pushing their views on him. I’ve been critical and supportive of him.
 
And they were lucky that a second guy on the roster that fit what they were trying to do.
Honestly, I don’t think this is what they want to do, but they’re actually calling plays to what they have. Which we haven’t seen in decades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TarheelHuskerFan
And they were lucky that a second guy on the roster that fit what they were trying to do.
Give Rhule credit. Very early on in the spring Rhule admitted he was surprised by Haarberg’s physical ability. I’m not sure what his ceiling might be.
 
Honestly, I don’t think this is what they want to do, but they’re actually calling plays to what they have. Which we haven’t seen in decades.
I think generally they are doing mostly what they want. They want to be a run based multiple offense. They’re just incorporating some different concepts to accomplish that at times. Every coach worth his salt adapts to his players. Rhule unlike Whipple clearly recognizes the value of a QB run game.
 
I think generally they are doing mostly what they want. They want to be a run based multiple offense. They’re just incorporating some different concepts to accomplish that at times. Every coach worth his salt adapts to his players. Rhule unlike Whipple clearly recognizes the value of a QB run game.
Whipple didn’t understand the value of the run game at all.
 
Whipple didn’t understand the value of the run game at all.
Very simple pro style runs for the most part with virtually no misdirection or deception. Liked his routes and passing game concepts. Not so much his run schemes. It might of helped if CT would have kept more on the zone read look play calls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GretnaShawn
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT