His Baylor offense seemed to have some juice. I know Nixon was heavily involved in that, but Rhule picked the OC's.
Scrimmage 2 notes
- Thread starter scarletred
- Start date
Why would you be tired of hearing this? It is why we hired him.
Yes his overall record is 52-50, but it is also 44-22 after year one and 31-10 after year two.
While there are no guarantees, past performance is the best indicator of future success.
Last edited:
Facts are lost on them. They would rather be obtuse
I know it took 2 decades but it nice to see the Lincoln office understand if your going to have a passing offense you need a good passing qb
Yep and hopefully we stick it to UTEP because if we look meh again.... Natives are going to be pissy right away.
I doubt we will look like a well oiled offense in that opening game. The whole team will be both excited and nervous. Raiola will have first game jitters and issues. Offensive line still needs to gel together in real game situations. QB and wide receivers still have to work on timing in a real game situation. Running backs need to shake off the rust of injuries.
Osborne always said your biggest improvement comes between games one and two. I hope so. I expect a defensive game against UTEP and an ugly win. And hopefully our offense comes out with more confidence and efficiency against CU. I will be at the CU game. I want to beat them so badly I can’t even describe it. I hate CU. But it will be a dogfight.
TO might have said that, but most of his teams still performed at a damn high level in the first game. I agree there are going to be some hiccups, but we can't also come out and look like last year where we struggle to do anything right on O. There has to be solid progress shown because that O was so bad last year.
We played in a bunch of kickoff classics against good teams. Needed to be ready. Biggest thing with TO teams was the option...timing.
All new schemes were installed last season. The Defense is typically ahead of the offense. Osborne's teams didn't install a new offense for a couple decades. That makes a difference. Even though we have a new QB, I fully expect our offense to be better in game 1 than they were a year ago. I doubt they will look like a well-oiled machine, but better than MN last year.
Scotty is a young hungry coach. He'll have that team ready to go. UTEP game won't be decided in the first half.
and that is my point. If that offense looks like Minnesota last year.... It doesn't have to be a massive jump, but it has to look better than last year or people are going to turn on Satt in a hurry
On paper, NU is a 28 point favorite but UTEP will run a snap every 14 seconds like Tennessee does, so the D will have to be on their toes. A team running a play every 14 seconds doesn't give much time for those helmets with a microphone much help. They also use multiple defenses, so they're gonna give DR some interesting looks to adjust to.
Last year when Scotty was at Austin Peay, at halftime they were tied 6-6 against Tennessee, so Huskers better be ready and take care of the ball. That's the same stuff TO would be talking about if he were still the head coach, in order to tamp down expectations of an easy opponent.
Physically, NU should whip the shit out of them, but until NU shows what it has, we're still that 5-7 team trying to find out not only how to win, but win convincingly.
These young head coaches, you just never know how good or bad they are. He could be the next Frost unable to make the move from G5 to P5, or he could be the next Urban Meyer moving from Bowling Green to Utah to Florida. Probably the first instance, but many great ones have come out of nowhere.
Regardless, I expect the Husker defense to completely smother them.
Last edited:
Couldn’t disagree more.
I’m not sure anyone wouldn’t have called more QB running plays like Satt did. It was an obvious “go to” when you have someone with HH skill set. A high school coach who lost his drop back passer to injury and now has a running QB as backup would do the same.
The issue I have are the feeble amount of points actually scored. We had an absolutely pathetic offense last season. The close games we lost were because our defense gave up very few points and our offense managed to score even less.
Im not a fan of Satterfield AT ALL. Raiola might be a band aid to Satt’s lack of ability but I wonder if we will ever truly maximize DRs ability here.
Rhule is a GREAT college HC in my opinion. But Satterfield is his one Achilles heel imo.
I’m with ya buddy, hope you didn’t fork out $ 385 for game tickets like me and 3 of my buddies did last year in Boulder..
I agree. We need to look better than we did last year. Which means, first off, that we win the f$cking game! 😂 But last year’s standards set a pretty low bar and it won’t be too hard to show improvement over the Sims comedy show we saw first game last year.
All that said… Raiola might be the clone of Mahomes and the second coming of Brady. But he is a true freshman playing in his first game. Maybe he surprises me and comes out looking like a polished veteran. But I doubt it. We will win because he will make some great plays. But I think he, and the rest of the offense, will make some drive killing mistakes that will cause the offense to sputter.
My sister got us tickets. I don’t know how much she bought them for. She won’t tell me! Ha. That means she probably spent too much. All I know is if we lose to those asshats again I am going to have to be institutionalized.
Could be the same as COZ was to Callahan. Probably gets over the hump if he dumps an underperforming friend.
Hurry up offense and hopefully several 3 and outs could make for a scoring explosion for the Huskers. Hurry up offense only good if you move the chains
