Maybe something in the middle?He looks disinterested or upset and that's bad. But when he's happy, charismatic, or loose that's also bad. What are the appropriate emotions to show?
Maybe something in the middle?He looks disinterested or upset and that's bad. But when he's happy, charismatic, or loose that's also bad. What are the appropriate emotions to show?
Riley looked tired and older coming out of the tunnel the very first game.
I'm of the opinion that he wants to retire, but also wants to go out a winner.
Get to 8 wins and maybe a bowl win and you can go out on your own terms...get a cushy job in the athletic department to try to salvage recruits and be around the program, he's a good ambassador.
Im not predicting it, but at this point I am kind of hoping it. It beats the alternative of getting 5 wins and pushed out. He could also go win 9 and the big 10 west but it is the more unlikely scenario. Never know.[/QUOT
I can see Riley retiring. He 64 years old. I am sure he tired of all the crap. Get a settlement and head home. I don't think for one minute he will remain in Lincoln. Isn't his wife still in Corvallis most of the time with their daughter?
I don't understand this "hoping it" at all. You honestly really want to go through another coaching change? Riley retiring won't make it any easier for the players who would have to get used to a new coach, new schemes, etc., and most of this current recruiting class goes elsewhere and we start at the beginning recruiting-wise. The only thing him retiring does is make it less ugly for him. The result for the program would be no different at all whether he gets fired or retires.Riley looked tired and older coming out of the tunnel the very first game.
I'm of the opinion that he wants to retire, but also wants to go out a winner.
Get to 8 wins and maybe a bowl win and you can go out on your own terms...get a cushy job in the athletic department to try to salvage recruits and be around the program, he's a good ambassador.
Im not predicting it, but at this point I am kind of hoping it. It beats the alternative of getting 5 wins and pushed out. He could also go win 9 and the big 10 west but it is the more unlikely scenario. Never know.
Yes it would be different.I don't understand this "hoping it" at all. You honestly really want to go through another coaching change? Riley retiring won't make it any easier for the players who would have to get used to a new coach, new schemes, etc., and most of this current recruiting class goes elsewhere and we start at the beginning recruiting-wise. The only thing him retiring does is make it less ugly for him. The result for the program would be no different at all whether he gets fired or retires.
Which pro-Riley poster has said that? I've seen posters who aren't high on Riley make those comments, but not Riley fans.Heck, even our own Riley fans say things like " he wasn't brought here to win!"
I've seen plenty.Which pro-Riley poster has said that? I've seen posters who aren't high on Riley make those comments, but not Riley fans.
Very possible I missed it though.
I don't recall really seeing people saying that, but if somebody has, it certainly wasn't me, and anybody who says that is an idiot.I've seen plenty.
"He came in to fix a toxic environment and get recruiting in order and set it up nicely for the next coach to come in, who will probably win and have Riley to thank, what did you expect!?" etc etc. it has been said a lot by Riley apologists.
These things weren’t said from the start. Those statements occurred after seeing what’s been going on for 2+ years. It’s where goal posts truly have been moved.I've seen plenty.
"He came in to fix a toxic environment and get recruiting in order and set it up nicely for the next coach to come in, who will probably win and have Riley to thank, what did you expect!?" etc etc. it has been said a lot by Riley apologists.
I don't understand this "hoping it" at all. You honestly really want to go through another coaching change? Riley retiring won't make it any easier for the players who would have to get used to a new coach, new schemes, etc., and most of this current recruiting class goes elsewhere and we start at the beginning recruiting-wise. The only thing him retiring does is make it less ugly for him. The result for the program would be no different at all whether he gets fired or retires.
I've seen many posts like this and it's generally come from the pro-Riley camp.I've seen plenty.
"He came in to fix a toxic environment and get recruiting in order and set it up nicely for the next coach to come in, who will probably win and have Riley to thank, what did you expect!?" etc etc. it has been said a lot by Riley apologists.
And like I said, it’s revisionist... it didn’t start this way. The pro Riley camp thought he would revolutionize recruiting and develop players and we would be winning by now.I've seen many posts like this and it's generally come from the pro-Riley camp.
It depends on what you mean by win. I'm sure most people expected him to win at least 9 or 10 games like Bo, but he wasn't realistically expected to win championships. The next guy was supposed to do that. Now with the prospect of losing seasons, "winning" will mean not having a losing season.And like I said, it’s revisionist... it didn’t start this way. The pro Riley camp thought he would revolutionize recruiting and develop players and we would be winning by now.
Instead, seeing where things are at now, people are saying he was never expected to win, but to change the culture, which is silly.
At worst I seem to remember posters early on saying if (and I emphasize IF) he doesn’t win the pieces will be in place for the next coach. But I don’t think anyone said he wasn’t expected to win, just to change the culture.
That’s what I remember at least.
I don’t think any Riley apologist thought he would be worse than Bo, record wise. Championships? Maybe, but not completely expected. Hoped for? Yes. But 7-5? I don’t think any Riley apologist was down with that when we hired him.It depends on what you mean by win. I'm sure most people expected him to win at least 9 or 10 games like Bo, but he wasn't realistically expected to win championships. The next guy was supposed to do that. Now with the prospect of losing seasons, "winning" will mean not having a losing season.
I think you're confusing "Riley apologists" with "anybody but Bo" people. Most of the people you identify with the former are really the latter.I don’t think any Riley apologist thought he would be worse than Bo, record wise. Championships? Maybe, but not completely expected. Hoped for? Yes. But 7-5? I don’t think any Riley apologist was down with that when we hired him.
No.I think you're confusing "Riley apologists" with "anybody but Bo" people. Most of the people you identify with the former are really the latter.
My response is always, couldn't we find soembody who can do all those things and win? Always met with crickets.No.
Plenty of Riley lovers have said this. Plenty.
You're missing my point. I'm saying there really aren't many "Riley apologists", because most "Riley apologists" were just happy to have anyone but Bo. It's not that they were so pro-Riley as anti-Bo.No.
Plenty of Riley lovers have said this. Plenty.
If he was mad I wouldn't blame him. He left his comfort zone to build something and he came to a place that had no depth whatsoever and in year 3 while starting a young team people are calling for his head. Hopefully the nice guy getting mad leads to results and if he somehow gets to 7 or 8 wins we see what he can do next year with a more experienced squad.
Give him 3 less years than Blo and then let's talk about whether or not he can win enough.My response is always, couldn't we find soembody who can do all those things and win? Always met with crickets.