ADVERTISEMENT

Revise Overtime Rules and Ties

SLOHusker

Senior
Aug 7, 2001
2,507
2,969
113
I know NU has struggled in OT over the years but I also think it is time to reconsider mandatory OT and return to allowing regular season ties. Up until the early 90s ties were recorded when games ended with a tie score and with college football now having longer schedules and a 12 team playoff the exhaustion of playing OT and risk of injury needs to be evaluated. Also I feel like the current OT rules favor luck (the coin flip and first possession) and the team with the better kicker, and the very fact that you got to OT in the first place indicates that both teams are fairly equal. Having a game be recorded as a loss due to a fluke play in OT after battling to a draw in regulation just seems crappy.
I would consider a tie a half win in counting toward bowl eligibility.
1) I would record any non-conference games at the start of the season where the score is tied at the end of regulation as a tie.
2) For regular conference games I would add one 10 minute period to the end of regulation. Each team gets two timeouts. If the game ends in a tie it's recorded as a tie. The coaches can agree prior to the game to end the game as a tie without OT if they choose. Many would probably do that if their teams have had a lot of injuries, the game won't matter much in the final standings, or they play particularly hard schedules.
3) For championship and playoff games, OT is mandatory and starts with a 10 minute period. If after the 10 minute period the game is still tied it goes to a sudden death OT where the first team to score wins. It starts with a normal kickoff after a coin flip and neither team is guaranteed a possession.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: scarletred
I don’t have a problem with the OT rules and the fact that we have been embarrassed in the last 7 of them is not a reason to eliminate OT.

Tie outcomes are lame. Would rather see team captains come out and play rock, paper, scissors best of 3 than to end in a tie.
 
I don’t like the idea of putting the ball at the 3 yard line after 2 overtime’s.

Like having a kickoff in soccer.. STUPID.
 
I know NU has struggled in OT over the years but I also think it is time to reconsider mandatory OT and return to allowing regular season ties. Up until the early 90s ties were recorded when games ended with a tie score and with college football now having longer schedules and a 12 team playoff the exhaustion of playing OT and risk of injury needs to be evaluated. Also I feel like the current OT rules favor luck (the coin flip and first possession) and the team with the better kicker, and the very fact that you got to OT in the first place indicates that both teams are fairly equal. Having a game be recorded as a loss due to a fluke play in OT after battling to a draw in regulation just seems crappy.
I would consider a tie a half win in counting toward bowl eligibility.
1) I would record any non-conference games at the start of the season where the score is tied at the end of regulation as a tie.
2) For regular conference games I would add one 10 minute period to the end of regulation. Each team gets two timeouts. If the game ends in a tie it's recorded as a tie. The coaches can agree prior to the game to end the game as a tie without OT if they choose. Many would probably do that if their teams have had a lot of injuries, the game won't matter much in the final standings, or they play particularly hard schedules.
3) For championship and playoff games, OT is mandatory and starts with a 10 minute period. If after the 10 minute period the game is still tied it goes to a sudden death OT where the first team to score wins. It starts with a normal kickoff after a coin flip and neither team is guaranteed a possession.
Interesting read. Is OT perfect? But it's what we have.

You make some interesting points and you have put some thought into this.
 
I liked when there were ties. If you weren’t good enough to win in a 60 min regulation game, you didn’t get the credit as if you had.
 
I know NU has struggled in OT over the years but I also think it is time to reconsider mandatory OT and return to allowing regular season ties.
I would not be against this. Red zone only possessions definitely changes the game. It's especially true at the HS level. I've seen a few times where the bigger, run oriented team can just will itself across the goal line in four plays from the 10 yard line while the smaller, more balanced team struggles playing against a slower defense that doesn't have to defend the field vertically.
 
I don’t like the idea of putting the ball at the 3 yard line after 2 overtime’s.

Like having a kickoff in soccer.. STUPID.
A soccer shoot out is really silly. Deciding the outcome of a game by playing an entirely different sport almost. Makes me wonder if any college programs or high school Catholic teams recruit specifically to be strong in shoot out situations. Then just play super conservative if the game is tied, knowing that you have an edge in the shoot out.
 
I always thought it would be interesting to play a sudden-death overtime period under the same rules as regulation - with one exception: no punting.

Would make the start of overtime very strategic. If you win the toss, you could take the ball, drive into FG range, and win the game. But if you go 4-and-out, you could lose just as quickly.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT