ADVERTISEMENT

REPORT: Michigan presents $5 million NIL offer to 5-star QB Bryce Underwood

the "house settlement" is one of the courts not the legislative branch. but i agree, at some point congress may step in to bring some sanity to college sports. i too have believed this for a long time.

The House Settlement will only apply to that group of plaintiffs. The next group is waiting in line to file their cause of action, probably represented by the same NY law firm
 
Michigan's 2025 QB commit Carter Smith just decommitted. So, either he has gotten word that Underwood is accepting Michigan's millions, or he didn't like the fact that Michigan has made an offer to Underwood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WHCSC
Since my son is interested in going to school in that area I have done some research

University of Michigan Non-Resident cost of attendance: $80,142
Eastern Michigan University Non-Resident cost of attendance: $34,384
Michigan State University Non-Resident cost of attendance: $56,474
University of Nebraska Non-Resident cost of attendance: $46,860
Penn State University Non-Resident cost of attendance: $56,264 (included because my daughter attends)
What does this have to do with what Michigan NIL is willing to pay a player?
 
  • Like
Reactions: V-Doub
I don’t know how NIL works but isn’t this just pay to play? I thought that was a no-no.
You know what funny is that Deoins kid at Colorado Shedeur is actually what a NIL deal should be . 90 percent of his money is not tied to Colorado. It’s actually a true NIL deal. I love Tne fact that DR is our QB . Buy what does he actually Do for his money?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WHCSC
There’s an article about his potential flip on the front page of ESPN. Not a single mention of NIL in it. That seems unusual.

I hope the kids stick with his pledge to LSU.
 
In what way is Underwood’s deal different than any other NIL deal? (other than the exorbitant dollar amount)
I’m sure it’s not. I just thought that you couldn’t do “pay for play”. Maybe I’m wrong. Do these kids have to do some sort of advertising or something for that money?
 
  • Like
Reactions: V-Doub
I would be really curious to see an interview with businesses who set aside millions for these NIL deals...after a few years of these things have cycled through to see if they feel like they got their money's worth..and i'm serious. I would read that article start to finish.
 
I’m sure it’s not. I just thought that you couldn’t do “pay for play”. Maybe I’m wrong. Do these kids have to do some sort of advertising or something for that money?

I think if your NIL deal is through a “collective” there’s little responsibility on the athletes part cause the money comes from so many different sources. I think each contract stands on it’s own, as in, if a singular company donates a large amount to a collective with the understanding that this money is for a specific player or sub-set of players that are required to advertise for said company. Then yes, I suppose there would be some contractual obligations to advertise for said company. But in that sort of situation, why wouldn’t that company ink the NIL deal privately instead of going through a collective? In the end, the NIL money from a “collective” comes from a wide ranging and diverse pool. Private donations from fans and boosters, private companies and/or anyone who wants to support these athletes. In many cases there really isn’t any one specific company or organization for these kids to advertise for, except the collective it’s self.
 
I think if your NIL deal is through a “collective” there’s little responsibility on the athletes part cause the money comes from so many different sources. I think each contract stands on it’s own, as in, if a singular company donates a large amount to a collective with the understanding that this money is for a specific player or sub-set of players that are required to advertise for said company. Then yes, I suppose there would be some contractual obligations to advertise for said company. But in that sort of situation, why wouldn’t that company ink the NIL deal privately instead of going through a collective? In the end, the NIL money from a “collective” comes from a wide ranging and diverse pool. Private donations from fans and boosters, private companies and/or anyone who wants to support these athletes. In many cases there really isn’t any one specific company or organization for these kids to advertise for, except the collective it’s self.
So it’s just pay to play that the stupid NCAA says is against the rules.
 
So it’s just pay to play that the stupid NCAA says is against the rules.

No, not really. Kids get the money whether they play or not. Jeff Simms got benched and only played in 3-4 games, but he still got his NIL money. It’s not pay for play if you get the money regardless if you play or perform well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WHCSC
No, not really. Kids get the money whether they play or not. Jeff Simms got benched and only played in 3-4 games, but he still got his NIL money. It’s not pay for play if you get the money regardless if you play or perform well.
Good point
 
Since my son is interested in going to school in that area I have done some research

University of Michigan Non-Resident cost of attendance: $80,142
Eastern Michigan University Non-Resident cost of attendance: $34,384
Michigan State University Non-Resident cost of attendance: $56,474
University of Nebraska Non-Resident cost of attendance: $46,860
Penn State University Non-Resident cost of attendance: $56,264 (included because my daughter attends)
Per year? Dang
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT