Dime a dozenAlso could stand for dime bags,
Get off the dime
The government's dime
He got nickeled and dimed
Turn on a dime
Dime your amp and blow eardrums
Dime a dozenAlso could stand for dime bags,
I am too young to remember those ages so appreciate the corrections. It looks like they were studs in the 60’s and went 58-60 in the 70’s, which was apparently the start of their descent. Appreciate the lesson.You must be young. From the early 1960s until the mid-80s (when Missouri really fell off), Missouri vs Nebraska produced some fantastic hard-fought games. Do yourself a favor and watch the 74 (TO's first loss), 75 (Bumerooski), or 78 (James Wilder) games. Then ask your dad who is this guy named Randy Jostes
How old are you?I am too young to remember those ages so appreciate the corrections. It looks like they were studs in the 60’s and went 58-60 in the 70’s, which was apparently the start of their descent. Appreciate the lesson.
Warren Powers did not like TO.Edit: TO's first loss was the 73 game. That one is worth watching too
Mizzou is absolutely not a historical bottom feeder. both Dan Devine and Gary Pinkel had them regularly in the top 10 during two separate decades.You can go back to thread - I never once said that CO and Mizzou were not rivals. Not sure how I was wrong. Was only stating that many on the board say that Nebraska is too good to have Iowa as a rival but we readily accept Mizzou as one. That logic confused me as Mizzou is a historical bottom feeder. Not sure how I became obtuse, but will go back and see. Not sure why I would put you on ignore - but feel free to do so to me since I’m apparently a troll.
Randy Jostes, a DT from Ralston, playing for Mizzou, took out Jarvis Redwine’s knee on an insignificant XP attempt, intentionally.I am too young to remember those ages so appreciate the corrections. It looks like they were studs in the 60’s and went 58-60 in the 70’s, which was apparently the start of their descent. Appreciate the lesson.
I was never trying to discount history - only saying that it ain’t coming back any time soon unless we schedule those rivals as permanent non-conference games (those will be dwindling soon to) so we need to start duking it out and establishing true rivals with our conference foes.How old are you?
I am 63, I actually ran around on the grass of Memorial Stadium as a kid in mid 60’s. My father was a grad, an an engineer at Capitol Steel, across the street.
I got to enjoy the most incredible era of Nebraska football first hand. My father was also an usher at the Stadium in those days.
Never discount history in the rush to create new. We have more rivalry with PSU than probably any other B1G member.
amen, brotherNever discount history in the rush to create new. We have more rivalry with PSU than probably any other B1G member.
too bad we can't put our roller skates/key togetherAs Nebraska is finding out, you cannot artificially create a rivalry. The reason Wisconsin and Minnesota didn't pick Nebraska was because they have a long established history playing other schools and those actual rivalries were more important than playing Nebraska. Look at Penn St if you want to view a similar situation. They have zero Big Ten rivals after nearly 33 years in the league, there is literally no Big Ten team that is saying, we need to play Penn St every year. Sometimes rivalries develop, but there is a good chance that Nebraska will be more like Penn St with no real rival than say Iowa who has 2 or 3 teams that they want to play every year.
Actually, no. Randy Jostes had an egregious late hit on Turner Gill in the 82 game. The guy you're thinking of is Norm Goodman, who is in prison for life in Canada for sexual assaultsRandy Jostes, a DT from Ralston, playing for Mizzou, took out Jarvis Redwine’s knee on an insignificant XP attempt, intentionally.
More history.
Norm Goodman sounds like a real jerk.Actually, no. Randy Jostes had an egregious late hit on Turner Gill in the 82 game. The guy you're thinking of is Norm Goodman, who is in prison for life in Canada for sexual assaults
I read wrong, plus OWH blocks the story.Actually, no. Randy Jostes had an egregious late hit on Turner Gill in the 82 game. The guy you're thinking of is Norm Goodman, who is in prison for life in Canada for sexual assaults
I like Danny “Da Kid” Kaelin. Good gunslinger nickname and doesn’t associate to that doofus in NYWe can do so much better than “Dimes” for a nickname
Also could stand for dime bags, and it sounds very unimaginative.
As has been illustrated, Mizzou (and CO) haven't always been bottom dwellers. And you don't have to go all the way back to before we were born for when either one was successful. Both were playing for conference championships and finishing in the top 25 in the early 2000s just like we were. Don't have to go back very far to remember when the Big 12 North was pretty much a 2 man race between the 3 of us any given year.You can go back to thread - I never once said that CO and Mizzou were not rivals. Not sure how I was wrong. Was only stating that many on the board say that Nebraska is too good to have Iowa as a rival but we readily accept Mizzou as one. That logic confused me as Mizzou is a historical bottom feeder. Not sure how I became obtuse, but will go back and see. Not sure why I would put you on ignore - but feel free to do so to me since I’m apparently a troll.
F@&$&$) A ladies, you’ve got this much capacity for a proposed nickname of a quarterback, not yet on the roster?
This has certainly been illustrated. But for perspective - is Mizzou better historically than Iowa? I would venture to say they have similar paths as a program. So to say that Iowa is beneath us as a rival but accept Mizzou doesn’t align. That was the only point I was trying to make. Let’s not act like Mizzou is a world beater, blue blood. Then piss on a rival that is right next door to us with similar credentials as Mizzou.As has been illustrated, Mizzou (and CO) haven't always been bottom dwellers. And you don't have to go all the way back to before we were born for when either one was successful. Both were playing for conference championships and finishing in the top 25 in the early 2000s just like we were. Don't have to go back very far to remember when the Big 12 North was pretty much a 2 man race between the 3 of us any given year.
You seem to want to create a rivalry with Iowa. Before Nebraska joined the Big Ten the teams only played 4 times after WWII. There was no interest in either team playing the other. They share nothing in common except a border.This has certainly been illustrated. But for perspective - is Mizzou better historically than Iowa? I would venture to say they have similar paths as a program. So to say that Iowa is beneath us as a rival but accept Mizzou doesn’t align. That was the only point I was trying to make. Let’s not act like Mizzou is a world beater, blue blood. Then piss on a rival that is right next door to us with similar credentials as Mizzou.
Agree. I don’t care who our rivalries end up being - I’m just open to having some in the B1G. Iowa was used as an example. King made a good point about WI and others have said Penn St. Certainly don’t want it forced and many fans will have different opinions based on the people they interact with from other fan bases or neighbors (had a neighbor from Purdue so it was always fun to play them so we could razz each other). They will develop in time.You seem to want to create a rivalry with Iowa. Before Nebraska joined the Big Ten the teams only played 4 times after WWII. There was no interest in either team playing the other. They share nothing in common except a border.
They have played 53 times and even after losing 7 in a row to Iowa and 8 of the last 10, Nebraska still has won 60% of the games.
As I wrote, you cannot just create a rivalry, it has to grow organically. Can Iowa and Nebraska turn into a rivalry? Sure but it is going to take some time.
This has certainly been illustrated. But for perspective - is Mizzou better historically than Iowa? I would venture to say they have similar paths as a program. So to say that Iowa is beneath us as a rival but accept Mizzou doesn’t align. That was the only point I was trying to make. Let’s not act like Mizzou is a world beater, blue blood. Then piss on a rival that is right next door to us with similar credentials as Mizzou.
But the point that you have tried to make is that many believe Iowa is beneath Nebraska. It isn’t really about being beneath. There is literally 16 or 17 games of history since World War II.Agree. I don’t care who our rivalries end up being - I’m just open to having some in the B1G. Iowa was used as an example. King made a good point about WI and others have said Penn St. Certainly don’t want it forced and many fans will have different opinions based on the people they interact with from other fan bases or neighbors (had a neighbor from Purdue so it was always fun to play them so we could razz each other). They will develop in time.
The games have to mean somethingThis has certainly been illustrated. But for perspective - is Mizzou better historically than Iowa? I would venture to say they have similar paths as a program. So to say that Iowa is beneath us as a rival but accept Mizzou doesn’t align. That was the only point I was trying to make. Let’s not act like Mizzou is a world beater, blue blood. Then piss on a rival that is right next door to us with similar credentials as Mizzou.
And zero of those have meant anythingBut the point that you have tried to make is that many believe Iowa is beneath Nebraska. It isn’t really about being beneath. There is literally 16 or 17 games of history since World War II.
Which is the sacrifice you make by switching conferences unfortunately. A ton of history lost in an instant.But the point that you have tried to make is that many believe Iowa is beneath Nebraska. It isn’t really about being beneath. There is literally 16 or 17 games of history since World War II.
I mean - we did get a sweet gif of Frost bulldozing a linebackerAnd zero of those have meant anything
*Crouch*I mean - we did get a sweet gif of Frost bulldozing a linebacker![]()
That’s a mic drop from Barry.
With the transfer portal being such a game of musical chairs that extra recruiting effort often pays off later when a kid decides to transfer. He'll look at the schools that were 2nd, 3rd, or 4th choice. Look at Quinn Ewers for example. Was a Texas verbal commit, then signed with OSU, only to transfer to Texas.And had he committed to Nebraska, things could very well have went boom for Nebraska too.
We will never really know though.
I think having a QB committed is the common denominator. That is what gets things rolling, especially a top ranked QB, or an Elite 11 QB.
Not sure what that has to do with it. You don't recruit a player with the hope of getting him on the rebound. Getting a QB in the class is important. That QB can be the lead recruiter for the rest of the class. It wouldn't have mattered if it was Raiola or Kaelin, either was going to start the ball rolling.With the transfer portal being such a game of musical chairs that extra recruiting effort often pays off later when a kid decides to transfer. He'll look at the schools that were 2nd, 3rd, or 4th choice. Look at Quinn Ewers for example. Was a Texas verbal commit, then signed with OSU, only to transfer to Texas.