I have to agree with this.Comparing their W/L is so dumb and lazy. Look at who they played.
2022: Chubba didn't start vs Illinois. He came in after we were down 20-9.
Minnesota, lost the game. Did nothing after our first 2 possessions.
Michigan, got hurt right before halftime I think, but it wouldn't have mattered.
2023: NIU & LT, easy opponents.
Michigan, same result as Purdy did in 2022.
Illinois, not a good team.
2022 Illinois team >>>> 2023 Illinois team.
NW & Purdue, both bad.
Michigan St, not a good team to lose to. 3 turnovers I believe (he was lucky to not alhave a 4th in the endzone right before half).
Maryland, HH was clearly hurt. He couldn't do anything.
If you flip the games HH and Purdy played, the results are most likely the same. Only possible outcome difference could've been 2023 Michigan St & Maryland.
Purdy played the best game of the season of any QB against a decent defense. He scored 17 which would have beaten EVERY team that Haarberg beat. Every. Single. One.
One could argue that had Purdy played against Mich State and had less than 3 TOs (like HH) that we prob win. All speculative of course.
But every single set of eyes here
1. Acknowledged that Haarberg was better than Simms
2. Gave kudos to Kong for it.
3. Sees Purdy as the better QB
Kong is literally the only one here that is on the HH wagon after a more complete set of data is out. He literally ignores the fact that Haarberg has more turnovers than any QB in the entire nation. He covers that up by saying “but he wins”.