ADVERTISEMENT

Poll: Would you be in favor of...

What should be done to address relentless board negativity?

  • A. Let moderators use their discretion and perma-ban obvious "trolls".

    Votes: 54 38.3%
  • B. Amend the rules to create an equitable system to help weed such posters fairly and transparently.

    Votes: 24 17.0%
  • C. Change nothing, I like things just the way they are.

    Votes: 24 17.0%
  • D. We don't need no rules. We should be able to say and/or discuss anything and everything.

    Votes: 39 27.7%

  • Total voters
    141

V-Doub

Nebraska Football Hall of Fame
Jul 8, 2007
19,979
42,831
113
Langley Falls
An amendment to the board rules to potentially weed out people who only want to seed division and create controversy? Personally, I'm divided on the question. I don't like censorship, but this isn't free message board either and we already censor certain other things.

That being said, I also don't want this place to become a group think bubble. Healthy discussion and disagreement are good things and I want that to continue. But some on here just want to see things burn for whatever reason. They don't want healthy discussion they just want to see fans argue amongst each other and champion any and all things negative.

So I'm making this poll cause I'm divided on the issue. And there's the obvious issue that Dean probably doesn't want to perma ban any more paying customers then he absolutely has to. But if the majority of posters seem to want these people gone that does carry weight and could result in losing paying customers due to these people who only seek division. Help me out and vote guys. GBR
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back