I would be TERRIFIED anytime I pulled someone over...I could never do that job.
Agree we can bash this cop for overreacting in this situation. But no way I would want to walk up on a car at Midnight inEast St. Louis.
In HS we played East. St. Louis in the FB playoffs, two years in a row. Both years at their place. Scariest looking city I have seen. Old fences all over, everything was closed up, bars over all the windows (that were not smashed out).
Why do you think they pull over so many soccer moms?
With the course playing so easy, it's going to be a putting contest. Bryson's ability to turn long 4's into short 4's is a huge advantage with no wind.
Yep.
Ponch from CHips profiled...he only pulled over hotties! Hahaha
Why risk pulling over a felon gangbanger with a pound of weed and guns in the car when you can just ticket a soccer mom who just takes it?
I'm sorry, but this just struck me as "there's no way this is actually true." And...it's not. Just a quick search found several large scale studies that refute this. I'm not trying to start some kind of argument, I was curious and thought you or others might like to know.
Data. Study. Facts. Reality. You can call it whatever you like. I don't deal in narratives. Young people, men, and minorities are all more likely to be pulled over than soccer moms.
Mmhmmmm
You're right, all science and research and statistics everywhere and for all time is made up. Just believe your feelings! Maybe you can find me any data to back up your assertion that soccer moms get pulled over at disproportionately high rates? But wait - no! That actual evidence would just prove it isn't true. Probably best to just only believe in things that have literally no objective or empirical evidence whatsoever. You've changed my life. Thank you.Mmhmmmm
Just like the study that said the covid vax prevents people from getting covid?
If you haven't learned yet that a "study" can be made to say whatever you want idk how to help you.
Don't take it from me. Take it from a scientist.
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Published research findings are sometimes refuted by subsequent evidence, says Ioannidis, with ensuing confusion and disappointment.journals.plos.org
Don't believe your lying eyes, believe a "study!" 🤣🤣🤣🤣
They’ve played Valhalla before in the past and it was fine. The heavy rain made the course play much easier. I agree with your view that majors shouldn’t be this easy…we’ve had 4 rounds of 62 in the past two years…that’s not good for the game. Just not sure how it could have been avoided. It’s like st Andrew’s without the wind is pretty easy for the players.
If Sheffler wouldn't have choked on Saturday he'd have been close.
Yep .People don’t understand when the conditions are favorable as they were in Louisville because of the rain that these guys are fkn that good. As you say if there was no wind at StAndrews( not likely) they would destroy that course.
Yeah, I agree. It was going to be tough to do much with it, but I think they should take Valhalla out of the mix. I'm just not a fan of that golf course either.
Scheffler choked? Uh, ok. This combined with some of your other posts certifies that you aren't smart.
