Well 1st, wasn't this thread about Craft Beer bill?
Second, "don't get why a company should be forced to give
paid maternity/paternity leave."
Well...
The company should be forced to pay, because they can and they have the money to do it. The worker "Who just had a child <- EXPENSIVE" will need those 6 pay checks to get by. The Company will lose overhead, and it will take away a couple steak dinners at Flemings for them.
Why should public sector employee's be "forced" to pay for health insurance like the private sector? Teachers, DHS, Plow Truck drivers, Mail Men ect...
Wisconsin already did this 5 years ago... how well did that help them out?
Iowa is going to do it here shortly... Why you ask? So Big Company's can get a tax break, and private sector employees can save $20-$30 a year for health care?
Yeah lets screw over 184,000 public sector employees and their families so Bob Smith the cashier at McDonald's can save $20 a year on HC.
Public Sector Employees aren't Rich, they are the definition of Middle Class. This isn't a Robin Hood story here. Branstad is not taking money from the Rich and Giving it to the poor here. He is taking money from the Middle Class to pay the rich, so they can employ more of the poor.
http://iowalabornews.com/?p=16504
People took these jobs, because they have the perks of good benefits, and not high pay. Now the public sector benefits aren't fair? Why is it not fair for the public sector employee's to have better benefits?
Everyone has the right to apply to be a mail man or go to school to become a teacher. Public Sector employee's "for the most part" worked their way from the Private sector to get these public sector jobs.