ADVERTISEMENT

OT-California home prices...

This too will bust. Consumer debt is higher than it was prior to the last crash in real estate and stocks. Over 60% of the loans / lease of the top 3 most expensive vehicle are sub-prime. It has already hit Colorado hard a track home in Denver Colorado can easily go for over $ 450,000.00 lots f wealth here but unsustainable. Prepare for the next cycle if your old enough you remember 87,92,94,97,2001, 2007, etc.

Not doom and gloom just reality unaffordable lifestyle that will go out to eat and put it on a credit card with no concern of how to pay it off.
nearly 80% of the student loans in default are from students that never completed the degree they borrowed the student loans for. Interesting times.

Good commercial and residential deals will come soon.

Just to add to this, a recession is coming soon. We have propped our economy on stimulus packages instead of sustainable growth. The next 3-6 years we are in for another one. It will be the housing bust all over again.
 
its like randy taylor and the jimmy dean sausage phenomenom.
 
Son went to school in Pasadena and after graduation got a good job and lived in the LA/OC area. Not only was the rent ridiculous so was the apt. rental application! Fresh out of college without much credit history we had to co-sign and I've never seen such an application in my life. Probably 20+ pages for a RENTAL app! I actually called the apt manager to confirm what they needed. I told her, truthfully, that we've bought/sold houses with less paper work. 5 yrs later son gets dream job and moves up to the Bay area and we discover housing is even worse in the Bay area. We're fortunate that he's able to live with his grandfather while he saves enough to try to buy something.
 
Spent some time in Porter hospital in Denver last week and I asked almost every hospital employee I came into contact with where they lived and how long of a drive they have to work. To a man, they all lived (in perfect traffic conditions) 35min to an hour away from the hospital because of home prices in that area. If traffic was bad, or an accident, it jumped to an hour. They all said the area around Porter was unaffordable. Fixer uppers that weren't that big with one car garages sell for $350K. Yikes.
 
I would think that this would be one of the reasons that some states push for $15/hr minimum wage.

I bought my current house for $100k a couple years ago. White brick home built in 1974, 2100 sqft main level, 1850 sqft basement, 800 sqft garage, corner lot.

When I lived in North Platte after college (2005) I rented a 1 bdrm house for $195/month. Making 45k right out of college and living there allowed me to save a hell of a lot of money.

Curious what a gallon of milk and the normal groceries cost in some of those places mentioned above and whether the cost ratio (rural Nebraska vs Inner city Cali/NY) applies to food as well.
Food prices are altered a bit, but not to the extent of housing (rent and purchase.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwinsRRUs
I live in the 18th best city live in the US. According to money magazine. You can get 4 times that for 300k.
 
Just to add to this, a recession is coming soon. We have propped our economy on stimulus packages instead of sustainable growth. The next 3-6 years we are in for another one. It will be the housing bust all over again.
You come from the financial service background right? I'd have a couple of questions from your comments above. Could you PM at djourada@yahoo.com

TIA
 
  • Like
Reactions: GretnaShawn
Parker is a steal compared to Boulder and very, very nice. I'm not so sure there is a bubble in CO though. People still moving here in droves and bringing lots of $. Maybe the weed has something to do with it?
Weed, lower prices on housing than California has a lot to do with it. Only problem is, Parker is growing way too fast now. DTC and Inverness are big with tech companies, but there are already rumblings of a slowdown. Don't know if that will really happen, but it wouldn't surprise me. Never thought my 1775sf home that we bought back in 1985 would be worth near $400k, but it's about there. Bought a place northwest of Phoenix in Surprise back in 2011, moving there in a few years, paid less than $145k for it in a gated neighborhood.
 
Just to add to this, a recession is coming soon. We have propped our economy on stimulus packages instead of sustainable growth. The next 3-6 years we are in for another one. It will be the housing bust all over again.

Freakin' Bill Clinton...
 
Not many last names like that one...don't happen to be related to Stephanie from Grand Island, do you?
Do you live in the Denver area by chance? I saw your post last week about offering to bring me something regarding a post I had made...thank you for the offer BTW.
 
Weed, lower prices on housing than California has a lot to do with it. Only problem is, Parker is growing way too fast now. DTC and Inverness are big with tech companies, but there are already rumblings of a slowdown. Don't know if that will really happen, but it wouldn't surprise me. Never thought my 1775sf home that we bought back in 1985 would be worth near $400k, but it's about there. Bought a place northwest of Phoenix in Surprise back in 2011, moving there in a few years, paid less than $145k for it in a gated neighborhood.
Just to add to this, a recession is coming soon. We have propped our economy on stimulus packages instead of sustainable growth. The next 3-6 years we are in for another one. It will be the housing bust all over again.



I'm not so sure Denver will have a true "Housing Bust". been doing home loans out here for 20 years. The last one wasn't due to anything other than the Subprime Market imploding on the Options Arms and 2/28s. Prices leveled out and people couldn't get out of them.

Sad part is...about 70% of those could have been avoided had borrowers went to an FHA approved Lender. Could still do the -0- down BUT they could also streamline without concern to existing value to lower a payment.

Licensing requirements have eliminated a large number of the bad guys but some still exist. Prices only dropped due to a flood of foreclosures. The Front Range is, and will remain, an extremely attractive place to move to.

I have no concern of a crash out here. Will prices cap out? Sure...and it's getting close. Those are leveling out now due to the massive # of new builds going up and the ones in planning. People will no longer have to over pay for a 100 yr old house.
 
I'm not so sure Denver will have a true "Housing Bust". been doing home loans out here for 20 years. The last one wasn't due to anything other than the Subprime Market imploding on the Options Arms and 2/28s. Prices leveled out and people couldn't get out of them.

Sad part is...about 70% of those could have been avoided had borrowers went to an FHA approved Lender. Could still do the -0- down BUT they could also streamline without concern to existing value to lower a payment.

Licensing requirements have eliminated a large number of the bad guys but some still exist. Prices only dropped due to a flood of foreclosures. The Front Range is, and will remain, an extremely attractive place to move to.

I have no concern of a crash out here. Will prices cap out? Sure...and it's getting close. Those are leveling out now due to the massive # of new builds going up and the ones in planning. People will no longer have to over pay for a 100 yr old house.
Thankfully the southwest side is walled up against c-470 and the Ken Caryl valley with very little room for growth up to I-70. Hope it stays that way, although the Solterra buildup by Green Mountain is making a mess of things, and the retail/commercial land for sale by Bandimere is troubling to see.
 
I'm not so sure Denver will have a true "Housing Bust". been doing home loans out here for 20 years. The last one wasn't due to anything other than the Subprime Market imploding on the Options Arms and 2/28s. Prices leveled out and people couldn't get out of them.

Sad part is...about 70% of those could have been avoided had borrowers went to an FHA approved Lender. Could still do the -0- down BUT they could also streamline without concern to existing value to lower a payment.

Licensing requirements have eliminated a large number of the bad guys but some still exist. Prices only dropped due to a flood of foreclosures. The Front Range is, and will remain, an extremely attractive place to move to.

I have no concern of a crash out here. Will prices cap out? Sure...and it's getting close. Those are leveling out now due to the massive # of new builds going up and the ones in planning. People will no longer have to over pay for a 100 yr old house.

I was more or less saying that a recession within the next 5-6 years is inevitable (probably sooner) and a lot of people live beyond their means, so the housing market will take another hit.

Trump also prodding China could also pour some gas on that fire if it doesn't play out the way he hopes.
 
Son went to school in Pasadena and after graduation got a good job and lived in the LA/OC area. Not only was the rent ridiculous so was the apt. rental application! Fresh out of college without much credit history we had to co-sign and I've never seen such an application in my life. Probably 20+ pages for a RENTAL app! I actually called the apt manager to confirm what they needed. I told her, truthfully, that we've bought/sold houses with less paper work. 5 yrs later son gets dream job and moves up to the Bay area and we discover housing is even worse in the Bay area. We're fortunate that he's able to live with his grandfather while he saves enough to try to buy something.

My guess is that this is due to the overly litigiousness of CA. It's an incredibly regulated state.
 
I'm guessing we see a lot of continued inflation over the next few years. Aside from Tariffs and Tax Incentives, the only way things can start to balance out, is if if the value of the dollar continues to fall dramatically.

Those people with big gains on their homes haven't necessarily made a profit as much as they have maintained their purchasing power of the devalued dollar.
 
I'm going to try and be respectful but housing prices have everything to do with population size, income levels and supply/demand not your premise of liberal policies.

These cities happen to have liberal leadership because the people in these cities elect them - so it is correlation but not causation.

Also people in these markets pay what they pay because they earn a lot more based on the economies in those cities. When people talk about what one can buy in Lincoln, they need to take into account that earning power shrinks significantly. Especially when considering many of these jobs are in the tech industry in SF, ad agencies in NYC, entertainment in LA, etc. those people simply can't find work in Nebraska and if they did it would be for pennies on the dollar.

Why are so many large cities in Texas affordable - except proudly liberal Austin? Check out how many high income businesses have relocated to Dallas, yet their housing is in line with national inflation. Maybe this is an anomaly.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.forb...using-more-expensive-than-other-texas-cities/
 
  • Like
Reactions: huskerfan1414
And this LBJ joker has another thing coming if he thinks I'm paying his new interest rates! I'll live in a split-level my whole life with my wife and two kids if that's what it takes to send a message!
 
Not many last names like that one...don't happen to be related to Stephanie from Grand Island, do you?
It's Bohemian and I'm finding it's more common that I even thought. A few here in Omaha that I have no known relation with, but I'm assuming I have some kind of distant relation with.. I guess there's a few from the town of Prague and I think my great-grandfather (or great-great) came from there. I grew up just west of Kearney and there's a handful of us there.

To answer your question, I don't know if I'm related to the Stephanie you're talking about. Possibly, but I wouldn't know how.
 
It's not an anomaly....
It's a really big stretch if anyone thinks the impact of local government officials have an impact on housing prices. It's about city size (where can you grow), which impacts the amount of housing available, added to the income levels of people in a particular market. Houston and Dallas are physically HUGE cities. There is ample space to build new properties and still be in the city. New York City, on the other hand is very small so there is limited potential and land value is extremely high. This isn't about taxes. Yes, tax rates can have a moderate impact, but nothing to the level of a 600 sq ft. apartment in Manhattan going for a million dollars. That is all about a desire to live in the greatest city in the world, combined with high income potential and limited space.

But I guess "TheLiberalHunter" is a chief economist and should be a trusted media source, because your gut tells you so.
 
It's not an anomaly....
Chicago is also famously "liberal" yet housing hasn't increased like these other "liberal" cities you mention. God, I hate when people go out of their way to bring politics into any and every conversation possible. Get a life.
 
It's Bohemian and I'm finding it's more common that I even thought. A few here in Omaha that I have no known relation with, but I'm assuming I have some kind of distant relation with.. I guess there's a few from the town of Prague and I think my great-grandfather (or great-great) came from there. I grew up just west of Kearney and there's a handful of us there.

To answer your question, I don't know if I'm related to the Stephanie you're talking about. Possibly, but I wouldn't know how.

I sent you an email.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuskerO
Chicago is also famously "liberal" yet housing hasn't increased like these other "liberal" cities you mention. God, I hate when people go out of their way to bring politics into any and every conversation possible. Get a life.

If you can't figure out how Arnold Schwarzenegger and Harry Truman conspired to jack up these home prices, then I just don't know what else to say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chicolby
I'm going to try and be respectful but housing prices have everything to do with population size, income levels and supply/demand not your premise of liberal policies.

These cities happen to have liberal leadership because the people in these cities elect them - so it is correlation but not causation.

Also people in these markets pay what they pay because they earn a lot more based on the economies in those cities. When people talk about what one can buy in Lincoln, they need to take into account that earning power shrinks significantly. Especially when considering many of these jobs are in the tech industry in SF, ad agencies in NYC, entertainment in LA, etc. those people simply can't find work in Nebraska and if they did it would be for pennies on the dollar.
I agree but the employers of those cities do not have to stay especially when other cities offer incredible move to our state tax, building, and other incentives. There will always be a differential based on income ability, area profile, opportunities and other issues. The problem will be creating a generation and economy that can sustain it.
 
I agree but the employers of those cities do not have to stay especially when other cities offer incredible move to our state tax, building, and other incentives. There will always be a differential based on income ability, area profile, opportunities and other issues. The problem will be creating a generation and economy that can sustain it.
On the flip side, talent is the real competition in today's world and companies locate to bigger cities because there's simply more talent there. It's not simply about "oh, we're going to up and move to Des Moines because it's cheaper there" - they have to compete to find the best talent and many times that is why those companies are in the bigger cities in the first place. I'm not saying talent doesn't exist in smaller cities, of course it does, just not the massive amounts that allow a company to deal with growth spurts and turnover.
 
The Midwest is largely perceived among the top talent as "not the place to be". Google has no trouble filling high powered positions in Mountain View. There are a few positions in Council Bluffs that would be very desirable for anyone looking to get into Google and then moving around, but they've been open most of this year with no qualified candidates. (Interesting question, why wouldn't a top student at Carnegie Mellon then (or experienced professional), not just live in the Midwest a while to take that job?)

My brothers and best friend from high school are doing rather well for themselves working at places like Amazon on the coasts. In their opinion, you can make a nice little career for yourself in the Midwest and certainly have a nice house, but if you want the truly challenging leading edge work in the tech sector, you generally have to go out to the Coasts where these big companies are keeping the core of their talent.

Most of the really smart kids I ever went to high school with, have left the Midwest to take high paying programming jobs elsewhere, be it with Facebook or Google whoever even though they could have a decent wage at someplace like Hudl or LinkedIn here in Nebraska.

Some of them have found homes in places like Denver though, with Lockheed Martin and such. My middle brother just bough a 6 or 700 thousand dollar condo in downtown Seattle, and it won't even be built for a couple years.
 
Last edited:
When looking at an issue like this, it's best to consult the academic research. John Quigley and Steven Raphael, urban policy economists at UC Berkeley wrote a paper addressing the effects of regulation on home prices in California. Their conclusion was that, indeed, land use regulations and environmental regulations played a significant role in driving prices up. While one is free to dispute their analysis, I don't think it is wise to simply dismiss the idea as right wing propaganda. So, to whoever it was upthread who asked whether someone was an economist, this is the conclusion of two real economists.
 
It's a really big stretch if anyone thinks the impact of local government officials have an impact on housing prices. It's about city size (where can you grow), which impacts the amount of housing available, added to the income levels of people in a particular market. Houston and Dallas are physically HUGE cities. There is ample space to build new properties and still be in the city. New York City, on the other hand is very small so there is limited potential and land value is extremely high. This isn't about taxes. Yes, tax rates can have a moderate impact, but nothing to the level of a 600 sq ft. apartment in Manhattan going for a million dollars. That is all about a desire to live in the greatest city in the world, combined with high income potential and limited space.

But I guess "TheLiberalHunter" is a chief economist and should be a trusted media source, because your gut tells you so.
While you arent wrong that the demand will help drive prices up....
Local governments can absolutely affect inflation and the cost of building homes. New home costs affect the housing market as a whole.
The cost of living is atrocious in these cities, it isnt just housing.
Their policies can and do have a direct effect on the cost of living and rental/home prices.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT