ADVERTISEMENT

OT:Amar'e Stoudemire Comments

mwulf

Offensive Coordinator
Dec 15, 2013
8,460
7,702
113
Thigh Land
Really surprised these types of comments are being made in 2017 on the platforms he has. Its either bold, stupid, ignorant , or a little of all.


http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/18795222/amare-stoudemire-says-avoid-gay-teammate

"I'm going to shower across the street, make sure my change of clothes are around the corner," Stoudemire said in an interview with Israeli website Walla Sport. "And I'm going to drive -- take a different route to the gym."

Asked if he was joking, Stoudemire responded, "I mean, there's always a truth within a joke."
 
Yeah I mean he checks off two major boxes that are usually targets of hate you would think he would be a little more open minded about something like this
 
Idiots are idiots, it doesn't matter how much money you have or what your skin color is or anything else. This guy's an idiot who can play basketball. If he couldn't play basketball he still be an idiot.
 
Let us look at the definition of the word "pervert", or " perversion".

If one does not like the definiion of either of these words, change them.

i understand that homosexuality is prevelant in up to 5% of any population. I get that, and I am glad that my boys are not. This is not because of the fact, but the backlash.

If you engage in a behaviour that is reprehensible to 95% of the population, be expected to take fallout.

This is simple math. Not core math........
 
He shouldn't have said anything but I think it's funny that we're supposed to believe that gay people have the superhuman ability to not be attracted to naked people of their sexual preference in the shower. When heterosexuals certainly do not possess it.
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/b...mire-homophobic-shower-joke-article-1.2985846


This guy probably has a better perspective on this type of topic. Smart guy indeed.

"These are serious times and we need serious people to lead important conversations, not petulant man-children spouting puerile prejudice," Amaechi told us.

"There is already one too many of those holding court in the media, and the world is poorer for it. Within the world of sport there are plenty of true role models -- on and off the floor -- whose words are carefully chosen to uplift and integrate society not join Trump and his grinning cabal in their 'locker room banter.'"

"In these tumultuous times, these true role models are the men and women whose voices we need to disseminate to every corner, not a braying jackass making a desperate grab for relevance amongst a constituency destined for extinction."

"Lastly, could someone please tell this man to stop flattering himself. It’s embarrassing."
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/b...mire-homophobic-shower-joke-article-1.2985846


This guy probably has a better perspective on this type of topic. Smart guy indeed.

"These are serious times and we need serious people to lead important conversations, not petulant man-children spouting puerile prejudice," Amaechi told us.

"There is already one too many of those holding court in the media, and the world is poorer for it. Within the world of sport there are plenty of true role models -- on and off the floor -- whose words are carefully chosen to uplift and integrate society not join Trump and his grinning cabal in their 'locker room banter.'"

"In these tumultuous times, these true role models are the men and women whose voices we need to disseminate to every corner, not a braying jackass making a desperate grab for relevance amongst a constituency destined for extinction."

"Lastly, could someone please tell this man to stop flattering himself. It’s embarrassing."
Lol at the Trump mention. Idiotic beyond words.
 
I know when I was in my early 20s I absolutely would have said something like this but life and getting older and learning about other people has expanded my views. I am a little surprised at his age that he would still think like this. I wonder if he was still playing in the NBA if he would have said the same thing because if he did its a career ender.
 
Let us look at the definition of the word "pervert", or " perversion".

If one does not like the definiion of either of these words, change them.

i understand that homosexuality is prevelant in up to 5% of any population. I get that, and I am glad that my boys are not. This is not because of the fact, but the backlash.

If you engage in a behaviour that is reprehensible to 95% of the population, be expected to take fallout.

This is simple math. Not core math........
But it's not reprehensible to 95% of the population.
 
Let us look at the definition of the word "pervert", or " perversion".

If one does not like the definiion of either of these words, change them.

i understand that homosexuality is prevelant in up to 5% of any population. I get that, and I am glad that my boys are not. This is not because of the fact, but the backlash.

If you engage in a behaviour that is reprehensible to 95% of the population, be expected to take fallout.

This is simple math. Not core math........
Not being gay doesn't mean you find being gay reprehensible. For God's sake what is wrong with you? Hopefully someone with some compassion is raising those boys you referenced.
 
But it's not reprehensible to 95% of the population.
Perhaps reprehensible is not a good choice of words, but I would suggest in my work and social circles his numbers would be pretty damned accurate. This board is obviously a more "enlightened" population than my usual social and work contact population. Most people even if they find homosexual actions "reprehensible" are polite enough to keep it to themselves. Some will not so you will have repercussions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OO Snipes
I kinda see it as to each their own. Doesnt hurt me in one bit and who am I to disapprove of someone's pursuit of happyness. As far as Amare goes he had to know this would not be met well by a large part of the population or he just doesnt care. Hell I read earlier he was fined 50k for slurs back in 2012. I guess you give the guy credit for sticking by his own beliefs as narrow minded as they may be.
 
Perhaps reprehensible is not a good choice of words, but I would suggest in my work and social circles his numbers would be pretty damned accurate. This board is obviously a more "enlightened" population than my usual social and work contact population. Most people even if they find homosexual actions "reprehensible" are polite enough to keep it to themselves. Some will not so you will have repercussions.
Holy shit, this board is more enlightened than your usual social and work circles? You live and work in a "compound" in Idaho or something?
 
the locker room has been an uber masculine/sacred place for speech since the beginning of sports. Every guy that has been in one knows that. Guys are wired to think about sex constantly and in a locker room there is often no filter. Times are certainly changing, and as I do agree on being inclusive myself. I also know you can't force your beliefs on others, and the locker room is not a "safe space". Keep free speech flowing!

P.S Funny that trump bashing is allowed on this sight(which I'm fine with) , but make mention of liberals and democrats and you get censored
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: huskerfan1414
Not being gay doesn't mean you find being gay reprehensible.For God's sake what is wrong with you? Hopefully someone with some compassion is raising those boys you referenced.
This is an accurate statement. But, why is attacking someone's character for his heterosexual agenda ok. I'm all for gay marriage, not my or gov's business. I'm also teaching my sons that marriage is between a man and a woman. That's my right! It Doesn't mean that I find Gay people reprehensible, just that we differ in beliefs.
 
P.S Funny that trump bashing is allowed on this sight(which I'm fine with) said:


Trump is a special case he is not really a Republican or Conservative or Democrat or Liberal so no one should get too upset in criticizing his "leadership"
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jeans15
the locker room has been an uber masculine/sacred place for speech since the beginning of sports. Every guy that has been in one knows that. Guys are wired to think about sex constantly and in a locker room there is often no filter. Times are certainly changing, and as I do agree on being inclusive myself. I also know you can't force your beliefs on others, and the locker room is not a "safe space". Keep free speech flowing!

P.S Funny that trump bashing is allowed on this sight(which I'm fine with) , but make mention of liberals and democrats and you get censored
Evidence? Or alternative facts?
 
Maybe he shouldn't have made the statement public but where does it say that you have to agree with homosexuality or condone it? To each his own but everyone should have their own beliefs without all the backlash. I'm not showering with a gay man neither..
 
Maybe he shouldn't have made the statement public but where does it say that you have to agree with homosexuality or condone it? To each his own but everyone should have their own beliefs without all the backlash. I'm not showering with a gay man neither..
He's welcome to say what he wants. Just as the public is free and welcome to think he has a stone-age point of view and they may become disenfranchised with him for it.

No rules. No laws. Just a choice he can choose to make if he wants to alienate people who believe otherwise.
 
Trump is a special case he is not really a Republican or Conservative or Democrat or Liberal so no one should get too upset in criticizing his "leadership"
This is true, and power should always be questioned. I've just had pretty harmless speech squashed on these boards in the past, and don't like seeing that.. Lock the thread if you wish, but don't change or delete what I write.
 
He's welcome to say what he wants. Just as the public is free and welcome to think he has a stone-age point of view and they may become disenfranchised with him for it.

No rules. No laws. Just a choice he can choose to make if he wants to alienate people who believe otherwise.
I would bet, he's not alienating many of the guys in that locker room. But you're right that nothing good comes from this
 
Maybe he shouldn't have made the statement public but where does it say that you have to agree with homosexuality or condone it? To each his own but everyone should have their own beliefs without all the backlash. I'm not showering with a gay man neither..


I would bet that if you have ever showered in the school gym, the YMCA or any fitness facility that didn't have individual showers that you have showered with a gay man. You just didn't know it.

I also find it comical that dudes who women aren't attracted to, somehow believe that a every gay man would be attracted to them just because they are a man and the other dude is gay.

Rest assured that if you aren't pulling women, a gay man isn't interested in your overweight, hairy, ugly ass either.
 
I would bet that if you have ever showered in the school gym, the YMCA or any fitness facility that didn't have individual showers that you have showered with a gay man. You just didn't know it.

I also find it comical that dudes who women aren't attracted to, somehow believe that a every gay man would be attracted to them just because they are a man and the other dude is gay.

Rest assured that if you aren't pulling women, a gay man isn't interested in your overweight, hairy, ugly ass either.
Maybe your right but is it OK for anyone to disagree with homosexuality? Are you offended that people think it's wrong?
 
  • Like
Reactions: huskerfan1414
Maybe your right but is it OK for anyone to disagree with homosexuality? Are you offended that people think it's wrong?
I think that question comes down to choice. Some feel its something you are born with some feel its a learned behavior or choice. I personally am not offended bythose that think its wrong with it but I also certainly think people shouldnt be denied basic rights available to the general population of heteros
 
Maybe your right but is it OK for anyone to disagree with homosexuality? Are you offended that people think it's wrong?


When people are so overtly disagreeable with homosexuality, it just makes me wonder why they have to share their opinion with such disdain and why are they so offended by the homosexual person. Are they really threatened by this gay individual? Is it just a lack of understanding? Are they worried they are going to catch gayness like a virus? Is it just because it's different so it should be ridiculed?

Why can't you just disagree with homosexuality without being angry and insulting to the other individual? Why not just not associate with members of that community without having to justify yourself by making yourself feel better.

I have gay friends, they don't actively recruiting people like it's a cult. It's just who they are and not a threat to me or my way of life.
 
Perhaps reprehensible is not a good choice of words, but I would suggest in my work and social circles his numbers would be pretty damned accurate. This board is obviously a more "enlightened" population than my usual social and work contact population. Most people even if they find homosexual actions "reprehensible" are polite enough to keep it to themselves. Some will not so you will have repercussions.
For the most part I think homosexual "actions" are kept private. I find it just as disturbing to see a straight couples "actions" in public.

Seeing a dude grind up on another dude at a dance club is not my cup of tea, but neither is Flat Billed Cap wearing wanna be Pimp grinding up on some girl that put on way to much makeup and too little clothes.

I am a firm believer in you are who you are, and what you do is your business not mine. I think to many people are on the opposite end of the spectrum and think they need to make everyone like them and their thoughts. If it is not what you grew up to be customary, then it is wrong. Why exactly?

The person I hate more than anyone is the "I'm better than you, and more deserving of things because my parents were rich" guy or girl. They are entitled and they bother me more then anyone else in the world's population. That "Gay" guy/girl puts his pants on just like you, and if the "Gay" guy/girl isn't an a$$hole then I would look at him/her no differently then anyone else!
 
Let us look at the definition of the word "pervert", or " perversion".

If one does not like the definiion of either of these words, change them.

i understand that homosexuality is prevelant in up to 5% of any population. I get that, and I am glad that my boys are not. This is not because of the fact, but the backlash.

If you engage in a behaviour that is reprehensible to 95% of the population, be expected to take fallout.

This is simple math. Not core math........
Hardly 95%. What consenting adults (or even two consenting adolescents) do in privacy is none of my business. It may not be my cup of tea, but it certainly isn't harmful to me. This seems to be a sentiment that is shared by many on the heterosexual side.
 
I would bet that if you have ever showered in the school gym, the YMCA or any fitness facility that didn't have individual showers that you have showered with a gay man. You just didn't know it.

I also find it comical that dudes who women aren't attracted to, somehow believe that a every gay man would be attracted to them just because they are a man and the other dude is gay.

Rest assured that if you aren't pulling women, a gay man isn't interested in your overweight, hairy, ugly ass either.
Yeah because all of that rampant, irresponsible gay sex going on in the 80'S that turned AIDS into a national crisis, was only sex by two dudes that found each other just soooo attractive.

Do yourself a favor and do some research or watch some docs on the subject and you would be floored at how many sex partners the average gay man has by the time they are 30....the numbers sometimes are semi comparable to Wilts numbers. You are not going to tell me people with that many parters are always really choosy with who they bang.
 
  • Like
Reactions: huskerfan1414
When people are so overtly disagreeable with homosexuality, it just makes me wonder why they have to share their opinion with such disdain and why are they so offended by the homosexual person. Are they really threatened by this gay individual? Is it just a lack of understanding? Are they worried they are going to catch gayness like a virus? Is it just because it's different so it should be ridiculed?

Why can't you just disagree with homosexuality without being angry and insulting to the other individual? Why not just not associate with members of that community without having to justify yourself by making yourself feel better.

I have gay friends, they don't actively recruiting people like it's a cult. It's just who they are and not a threat to me or my way of life.
Just found out that one of the younger guys in one of my people groups is gay (the kid got a boyfriend, pics on FB). I am sure some if not most of the others in the group knew this, but I am only occasionally with these people. Never came up in conversation. I guess I never thought about it, maybe inherently assumed he was straight. Helluva nice kid, really bright, tons of fun to hang with in a group setting. That's the level of evolution on the issue in some areas. The kid gets to be who he is, no one is hung up about it to the point that it just isn't an issue.
Or maybe I have a complete lack of Gaydar.
 
Yeah because all of that rampant, irresponsible gay sex going on in the 80'S that turned AIDS into a national crisis, was only sex by two dudes that found each other just soooo attractive.

Do yourself a favor and do some research or watch some docs on the subject and you would be floored at how many sex partners the average gay man has by the time they are 30....the numbers sometimes are semi comparable to Wilts numbers. You are not going to tell me people with that many parters are always really choosy with who they bang.


Ha ha ha ok.
 
Yeah because all of that rampant, irresponsible gay sex going on in the 80'S that turned AIDS into a national crisis, was only sex by two dudes that found each other just soooo attractive.

Do yourself a favor and do some research or watch some docs on the subject and you would be floored at how many sex partners the average gay man has by the time they are 30....the numbers sometimes are semi comparable to Wilts numbers. You are not going to tell me people with that many parters are always really choosy with who they bang.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/06/gay-men-partner-survey_n_3223447.html
 
Yeah because all of that rampant, irresponsible gay sex going on in the 80'S that turned AIDS into a national crisis, was only sex by two dudes that found each other just soooo attractive.

Do yourself a favor and do some research or watch some docs on the subject and you would be floored at how many sex partners the average gay man has by the time they are 30....the numbers sometimes are semi comparable to Wilts numbers. You are not going to tell me people with that many parters are always really choosy with who they bang.
So you are saying that gay people are the only reason for Aids?

I am fairly confident in saying that there are plenty of (Straight) Wilt's out there that contributed to the Aids population, but you know it is always the ones you don't like's fault.

GIVE ME A BREAK... and if you are going to tell someone to do research... then please do a little more research youself outside of the "Why homosexuality is Wrong" book.

That is like telling a Liberal that they are wrong because Rush Limbaugh said...

or telling a conservative that they are wrong because Ed Shultz said...

Do yourself a favor add read a little outside your thought process, and you may be surprised at what you find!
 
Yeah because all of that rampant, irresponsible gay sex going on in the 80'S that turned AIDS into a national crisis, was only sex by two dudes that found each other just soooo attractive.

Do yourself a favor and do some research or watch some docs on the subject and you would be floored at how many sex partners the average gay man has by the time they are 30....the numbers sometimes are semi comparable to Wilts numbers. You are not going to tell me people with that many parters are always really choosy with who they bang.
Sound jealous.
 
tumblr_nwa89ireAC1rr0knko1_500.jpg
 
So you are saying that gay people are the only reason for Aids?

I am fairly confident in saying that there are plenty of (Straight) Wilt's out there that contributed to the Aids population, but you know it is always the ones you don't like's fault.

GIVE ME A BREAK... and if you are going to tell someone to do research... then please do a little more research youself outside of the "Why homosexuality is Wrong" book.

That is like telling a Liberal that they are wrong because Rush Limbaugh said...

or telling a conservative that they are wrong because Ed Shultz said...

Do yourself a favor add read a little outside your thought process, and you may be surprised at what you find!

My post wasnt to say homosexuality is wrong it was just to say that a lot of gay men are not that discriminitory when it comes to sex..

Aids is around primarily because of the gay population and the spread of it absolutely. Funny how wilt never got hiv even though he slept with 10k women huh?

Sure it is spread through iv drug users as well, but considering it is spread through blood, hetro sex (unlesss it involves anal) has a super low risk of a person contracting hiv much much lower risk than gay sex.
 
My post wasnt to say homosexuality is wrong it was just to say that a lot of gay men are not that discriminitory when it comes to sex..

Aids is around primarily because of the gay population and the spread of it absolutely. Funny how wilt never got hiv even though he slept with 10k women huh?

Sure it is spread through iv drug users as well, but considering it is spread through blood, hetro sex (unlesss it involves anal) has a super low risk of a person contracting hiv much much lower risk than gay sex.
I suggest you read up on subjects of this matter before you spreading your statement as fact. HIV is spread through the exchange of bodily fluids, blood included. How do you know whether Wilt used condoms or not?

Secondarily, the disease is scientifically proven to be spread based on different DNA and physical conditions. For example, heterosexual women are much more likely to be infected than heterosexual men - because of physical cases, not because of exchange of blood (e.g., anal sex).

You might learn a bit if you read this article.

This physical reason is why HIV spread rampant among gay men. Yes, I agree that promiscuous sex played a role in that, but until that time, men didn't believe they had any deathly reasons to use condoms and condoms were primarily created to stop pregnancies - not necessary among man on man sex.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOMHP
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT